FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W630718708> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W630718708 abstract "Government officials regularly the power of eminent domain to benefit private entities, and just as regularly justify their actions with post hoc assertions about the need to promote economic In Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the Fifth Amendment demands broad deference to a government's decision to exercise the power of eminent domain. Midkiff makes clear that use challenges are subject to rational basis review; so long as a taking can be justified by some conceivable public purpose, it will be upheld. Yet in recent years, a number of courts have put the government to its proof-requiring a demonstrated connection between the challenged taking and the particular purpose used to justified it. In so doing, these courts refused to allow the government to avail itself of the conceivability safety valve provided by rational basis review, a standard that requires approval of any taking that might serve the public interest in some theoretically possible way. In other words, these cases may have been wrongly decided. A central conclusion of this Article, however, is that they were not wrongheaded. This Article will show that the courts' instincts were sound, and that Midkiff needs to be supplemented with precisely the kind of means-ends scrutiny employed in these recent cases. This conclusion proceeds from an analogy to a different kind of claim. While the public-use limitation on the takings power has been widely regarded as a dead letter at least since Midkiff (notwithstanding the abovementioned surprises), standards for evaluating so-called takings have evolved substantially. Importantly, after Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard, the government may not demand that a property owner cede title to property in exchange for regulatory approval unless it establishes that the exaction demanded is roughly proportional to the impact of the proposed development. Although the exactions cases did not overrule Midkiff, they may have something important to say about the public problem. One federal court of appeals judge has suggested that considerable tension exists between the deference required in public cases and the heightened scrutiny of exactions. Recent public cases provide real-world evidence of this tension. Despite the fact that current law precludes inquiry into whether a compensated taking is calibrated to advance its asserted purpose, each these courts took pains to distinguish Midkiff so as to require the government to establish a means-ends connection similar to that demanded by Nollan and Dolan. This Article examines whether this jurisprudential move should be formalized - that is, whether a version of the means-ends review required of exactions should extend to public cases. Specifically, it explores (1) whether the justifications for heightened means-ends scrutiny of exactions are present when the government acquires land by eminent domain, and, (2) what such scrutiny might look like in a public case." @default.
• W630718708 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W630718708 creator A5031966018 @default.
• W630718708 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W630718708 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W630718708 title "The Public-Use Question as a Takings Problem" @default.
• W630718708 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W630718708 type Work @default.
• W630718708 sameAs 630718708 @default.
• W630718708 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W630718708 countsByYear W6307187082012 @default.
• W630718708 countsByYear W6307187082013 @default.
• W630718708 countsByYear W6307187082015 @default.
• W630718708 countsByYear W6307187082021 @default.
• W630718708 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W630718708 hasAuthorship W630718708A5031966018 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C2776050585 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C2776390805 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C2779362956 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C2780597233 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W630718708 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C121332964 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C138885662 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C161191863 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C162324750 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C163258240 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C17744445 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C190253527 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C199539241 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C2776050585 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C2776390805 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C2777855551 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C2778137410 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C2778272461 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C2779362956 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C2780597233 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C41008148 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C41895202 @default.
• W630718708 hasConceptScore W630718708C62520636 @default.
• W630718708 hasLocation W6307187081 @default.
• W630718708 hasOpenAccess W630718708 @default.
• W630718708 hasPrimaryLocation W6307187081 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W121564460 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W2011512658 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W2031923036 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W2764019819 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W280848873 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W280910232 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W2887569568 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W291040615 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3122069633 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3122083948 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3122228400 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3122491894 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3123867551 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3124516403 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3125251463 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W339701539 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W847962154 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3122381865 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3122526670 @default.
• W630718708 hasRelatedWork W3125364028 @default.
• W630718708 isParatext "false" @default.
• W630718708 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W630718708 magId "630718708" @default.
• W630718708 workType "article" @default.