FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W630934368> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W630934368 endingPage "20" @default.
• W630934368 startingPage "3" @default.
• W630934368 abstract "Objetivo: Con el proposito de comparar el sellado marginal de diferentes resinas compuestas para posterior en funcion de la microfiltracion en gingival y oclusal de restauraciones Clase II, se prepararon dos cavidades Clase II en 20 molares humanos extraidos. Metodologia: Se obtuvieron en total 40 cajones divididos en 4 grupos, evaluando para cada uno un material y tecnica diferente: G1, rok (SDI); G2, Filtek® P90 (3M ESPE); G3, rok (SDI) y Vitremer® (3M ESPE) (sandwich abierto) y; G4, Filtek® P90 (3M ESPE) y Vitremer® (3M ESPE) (sandwich abierto). Las cavidades fueron restauradas y selladas con esmalte para unas a un milimetro de los margenes gingival y oclusal; posteriormente, fueron sumergidas en solucion de azul de metileno por 24 horas. Los dientes fueron seccionados con un corte sagital, para luego obtener imagenes fotograficas a 18X de magnificacion. La microfiltracion fue cuantificada en milimetros en el margen gingival y oclusal. Resultados: El promedio de microfiltracion obtenido fue: en gingival, 2,6340 mm (G1), 0,0170 mm (G2), 0,2950 mm (G3) y 0,2390 mm (G4) y; en oclusal, 0,6590 mm (G1), 0,0070 mm (G2), 0 mm (G3) y 0 mm (G4). Estadisticamente, los subgrupos de microfiltracion presentaron diferencias significativas en gingival: G1 > G3 = G4 = G2 (p=0,00) y; en oclusal: G1 > G2 = G3 = G4 (p=0.019). Conclusion: La Filtek® P90 mostro los niveles de microfiltracion mas bajos en gingival comparado con los otros materiales. La combinacion de Filtek® P90 o de rok con Vitremer® evita la microfiltracion en oclusal. Comparing marginal sealing with conventional composite resin and silorane resin in class II cavities Abstract Objective: to compare the marginal sealing of different posterior composite resins according to the gingival and oclusal microleakage in class II restorations. Material and Methods: two class II cavities were prepared on twenty extracted human molars, obtaining forty boxes in total which were randomly assigned to each of four groups as follows: G1: rok (SDI); G2: Filtek™ P90 (3M ESPE); G3: rok (SDI) and Vitremer™ (3M ESPE) (open sandwich) y G4: Filtek™ P90 (3M ESPE) and Vitremer™ (3M ESPE) (open sandwich). The cavities were restored and sealed with nails polish at a milimeter of gingival and occlusal margins and immersed for 24 hours in 2% Methylene Blue dye. The teeth were sectioned in a mesio-distal direction, to obtain photographic images at a 18X zoom. The microleakage at the gingival and occlusal margin was quantified in milimeters. Results : The gingival microleakage average obtained was: 2,6340 mm (G1), 0,0170 mm (G2), 0,2950 mm (G3), and 0,2390 mm (G4); the in occlusal one was: 0,6590 mm (G1), 0,0070 mm (G2), 0 mm (G3), and 0 mm (G4). The microleakage subgroups showed statistically significant differences for gingival: G1 > G3 = G4 = G2 (p=0.00) and occlusal: G1 > G2 = G3 = G4 (p=0.019). Conclusion: Filtek™ P90 showed the lowest microleakage levels in gingival when compared to the others materials. The association of Filtek™ P90, or rok with Vitremer™, reduce completely the occlusal microleakage." @default.
• W630934368 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W630934368 creator A5052774370 @default.
• W630934368 creator A5067806800 @default.
• W630934368 creator A5080527079 @default.
• W630934368 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W630934368 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W630934368 title "COMPARACIÓN DEL SELLADO MARGINAL DE RESINAS CONVENCIONALES Y RESINAS DE SILORANOS EN CAVIDADES CLASE II" @default.
• W630934368 cites W1544525539 @default.
• W630934368 cites W193856544 @default.
• W630934368 cites W1958280878 @default.
• W630934368 cites W1999957486 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2006458069 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2008615794 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2009400025 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2018763031 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2020658448 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2020933625 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2065062480 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2108361686 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2113037174 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2125136407 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2140471872 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2337795546 @default.
• W630934368 cites W24444317 @default.
• W630934368 cites W3169562447 @default.
• W630934368 cites W2739892712 @default.
• W630934368 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W630934368 type Work @default.
• W630934368 sameAs 630934368 @default.
• W630934368 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W630934368 countsByYear W6309343682021 @default.
• W630934368 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W630934368 hasAuthorship W630934368A5052774370 @default.
• W630934368 hasAuthorship W630934368A5067806800 @default.
• W630934368 hasAuthorship W630934368A5080527079 @default.
• W630934368 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W630934368 hasConceptScore W630934368C121332964 @default.
• W630934368 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W630934368 hasLocation W6309343681 @default.
• W630934368 hasOpenAccess W630934368 @default.
• W630934368 hasPrimaryLocation W6309343681 @default.
• W630934368 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W630934368 isParatext "false" @default.
• W630934368 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W630934368 magId "630934368" @default.
• W630934368 workType "article" @default.