FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W63351757> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W63351757 abstract "The purpose of this study was to develop and test an instrument to measure client satisfaction among families who are clients of a child protective services agency. With the growing numbers of families coming into contact with CPS agencies, the burgeoning numbers of children in foster care, and the increasing attention to the effectiveness of services within this population, client feedback is one approach that has been largely ignored by CSP administrators. The basic problem this dissertation addressed is the issue of obtaining feedback from the involuntary client, such as the family in a child abuse case. Specifically, this dissertation addressed the following four research questions: 1. Can a client satisfaction instrument be developed for CPS clients largely through the input of the clients? 2. What are the domains of satisfaction that are applicable to CPS families? 3. How much involvement do the CPS families feel that they have in the planning and decision-making in their cases? What impact does this have on their overall level of satisfaction? 4. What are the relationships among the various domains of satisfaction and the overall level of satisfaction? Two rounds of interviews were held with families who had been clients of the CPS agency serving the State of Oregon, Children's Services Division. These interviews served as the major source of information for the identification of satisfaction domains and for the development of a closed-ended instrument to measure these domains. The responses to the interviews were content analyzed and four specific domains of client satisfaction were identified. These were: (a) Helpfulness, (b) Partnership, (c) Choice, and (d) Information Sharing. Items were also developed to comprise a General Satisfaction domain. A closed-ended instrument was constructed and pre-tested in two large Branch offices of the agency. This instrument included five items to address the interest of the agency in the issue of convenience. It also included seven items to gather information concerning the opinions of clients on the agency mission and goals. Results of the pre-test were analyzed and the instrument revised. The final instrument was mailed to a population of 4,337 CPS families. Surveys were returned by 489, or 11%, of the families. Analyses, including correlational analysis, factor analysis, and internal consistency reliability analysis, provided empirical support for the domains identified through the client interviews Analysis provided very little support for the convenience domain. Satisfaction on the four scales measuring the four domains of satisfaction" @default.
• W63351757 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W63351757 creator A5070603325 @default.
• W63351757 date "2000-01-01" @default.
• W63351757 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W63351757 title "The Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Client Satisfaction of Child Protective Service Families" @default.
• W63351757 doi "https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1288" @default.
• W63351757 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W63351757 type Work @default.
• W63351757 sameAs 63351757 @default.
• W63351757 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W63351757 crossrefType "report" @default.
• W63351757 hasAuthorship W63351757A5070603325 @default.
• W63351757 hasBestOaLocation W633517571 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C191511416 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C2780009758 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W63351757 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C144133560 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C15744967 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C162853370 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C191511416 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C2780009758 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C2780378061 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C41008148 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C75630572 @default.
• W63351757 hasConceptScore W63351757C77088390 @default.
• W63351757 hasLocation W633517571 @default.
• W63351757 hasOpenAccess W63351757 @default.
• W63351757 hasPrimaryLocation W633517571 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W101078167 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W1590621608 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W193769367 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2065975987 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2243216149 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2417577063 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W246694877 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2624920781 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W263736475 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2730567369 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2734034032 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2760917128 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W282379485 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2972699228 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2977968704 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2992135121 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W2992708733 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W36319241 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W41065837 @default.
• W63351757 hasRelatedWork W67733607 @default.
• W63351757 isParatext "false" @default.
• W63351757 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W63351757 magId "63351757" @default.
• W63351757 workType "report" @default.