FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W64076107> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W64076107 endingPage "1774" @default.
• W64076107 startingPage "1762" @default.
• W64076107 abstract "Increasingly, knowledge is recognized as a critical asset, where a firm or an individual’s competitive advantage flows from a unique knowledge base. The subsequent degree to which knowledge is then recognized and valued as a resource has been the theme of many papers on competitive advantage (Barney, 1991; D’Aveni, 1994; Nonaka & Teece, 2001; Prahalad & Hamel, 1990; Spender, 1996; Teece & Pisano, 1994). As a result, the ability to value and leverage external knowledge has become recognized as the basis of competitive advantage. Gulati and Gargiulo (1999) suggest that membership in a networked community satisfies the need for knowledge as a way to help cope with environmental uncertainty. Consequently, inter-organizational networks or communities of practice represent a significant conduit for knowledge transfer to help manage this environmental uncertainty (Madhavan, Koka & Prescott, 1998).1 Researchers in organizational learning have effectively concluded that organizations participating in a networked community will realize superior economic gains from their increased access to knowledge relative to independent or non-aligned firms (Argote, 1999; Baum & Ingram, 1998; Carlsson, 2002; Darr, Argote & Epple, 1995). Although the implications of membership in a network having any structure versus no membership (and therefore no structure) are generally accepted, the implications of the different structural types that these networks can assume are less understood. Networks can accommodate, for example, different levels of competition, different degrees of centralization, and different operational objectives. Knowledge may or may not transfer within different types of networked communities, raising an important question: Given that network membership is accepted as preferable for knowledge transfer relative to non-membership, does the specific network type in question have an effect on the degree to which knowledge will or will not transfer? This is the guiding research question of this article. Prior to an exploration of this question, it should be noted that a multi-entity network (or community of practice) is very different from a dyad, and therefore represents unique challenges with respect to research. Unlike a dyadic relationship, networked communities can take on a life of their own that supersedes the presence of any individual member. Simmel (1950), who studied social relationships, found that social triads (and relationships involving more than three entities) had fundamentally different characteristics than did dyads. First there is no majority in a dyadic relationship—there is no peer pressure to conform. In any group of three or more people, an individual can be pressured by the others to suppress their individual interests for the interests of the larger group. Second, individuals have more bargaining power in a dyad. This is not only true because of percentages, but if one member withdraws from a dyad, the dyad disappears—this is not true in a networked community. Finally, third parties represent alternative and moderating perspectives when disagreements arise. As a result of these differences, multi-entity networks are more complex to study and less understood than dyads." @default.
• W64076107 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W64076107 creator A5052124920 @default.
• W64076107 date "2011-05-24" @default.
• W64076107 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W64076107 title "Knowledge Transfer within Interorganizational Networks" @default.
• W64076107 cites W1509202718 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1517602275 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1518732113 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1541422837 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1566172004 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1573143678 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1738875511 @default.
• W64076107 cites W195853430 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1973248512 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1973308529 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1973459906 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1975937000 @default.
• W64076107 cites W1987582547 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2004590396 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2015486462 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2021171327 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2021638366 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2021964569 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2034640466 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2043864504 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2052963923 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2061977616 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2093497333 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2097763228 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2102435235 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2108795964 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2121222617 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2121996723 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2122465344 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2124687760 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2131846008 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2141725776 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2146405903 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2148097079 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2160380001 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2164405127 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2170211046 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2172157658 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2179492332 @default.
• W64076107 cites W229246804 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2314501994 @default.
• W64076107 cites W238850449 @default.
• W64076107 cites W286295083 @default.
• W64076107 cites W3022339544 @default.
• W64076107 cites W3122097470 @default.
• W64076107 cites W3122362861 @default.
• W64076107 cites W3124271238 @default.
• W64076107 cites W3213604345 @default.
• W64076107 cites W588965922 @default.
• W64076107 cites W649553552 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2315556200 @default.
• W64076107 cites W2335126140 @default.
• W64076107 doi "https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-933-5.ch147" @default.
• W64076107 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W64076107 type Work @default.
• W64076107 sameAs 64076107 @default.
• W64076107 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W64076107 countsByYear W640761072015 @default.
• W64076107 countsByYear W640761072020 @default.
• W64076107 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W64076107 hasAuthorship W64076107A5052124920 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C153083717 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C206345919 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C2776960227 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C4554734 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C58546491 @default.
• W64076107 hasConcept C76178495 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C144133560 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C153083717 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C154945302 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C162853370 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C206345919 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C2776960227 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C31258907 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C38652104 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C41008148 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C4554734 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C56739046 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C58546491 @default.
• W64076107 hasConceptScore W64076107C76178495 @default.
• W64076107 hasLocation W640761071 @default.
• W64076107 hasOpenAccess W64076107 @default.
• W64076107 hasPrimaryLocation W640761071 @default.
• W64076107 hasRelatedWork W1507043819 @default.
• W64076107 hasRelatedWork W1509621780 @default.

• next