FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W640975752> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W640975752 abstract "While the saving environment has become more complex in recent years, so has the demand for individual activity. Important impetuses include financial deregulation, globalization, technological change, and reformed pension systems. Financial institutions can provide financial advisory services to help their customers to obtain positive net benefits by avoiding mistakes and using economies of scale, and they can also attract and maintain their customers by creating strong relationships. Earlier studies show that the incentive structure often leads to advice that is not to the benefit of the customers. In addition, not all customers seek and receive advisory services. The objective of this study is to increase our understanding of the relationship between the bank advisor – customer relation and the bank customer’s saving behavior.The scope of the study is to analyze relevant theories and develop a model that includes financial advisors as a mediator of saving behavior, and to understand the relational attributes that can affect saving behavior. Also, the characteristics of customers with a relational versus a transactional exchange form with the bank are explored. Given the problems of establishing causality, the scope is also to understand the impact of the relationship and, in particular, face-to-face advisory meetings on saving behavior. The analysis is mainly carried out with the help of customer data – both objective bank register data and subjective survey data – while the advisor characteristics are to a lesser extent part of the data material.Five studies are carried out using various methodologies, i.e., theoretical review and model development, probit and multinomial logistic regressions, difference-in-difference regression, and structural equation modelling. In addition, a case study is made analyzing dyads of customers and advisors in order to explore theoretical assumptions. Economics and relationship marketing are used to explain saving behavior with transactional, interimistic relational, and enduring relational exchange forms (Paper 1). Several major findings emerge in the quantitative analysis: First, the attributes are longer and stronger, the more relational the exchange form is (Paper 2). A second finding is that relational attributes also surface in transactional exchange, a finding that requires further research to be understood in more detail (Paper 2). Third, among relational attributes, duration and context have the largest total effects on saving behavior, while trust is a mediating variable (Paper 5). Fourth, not only demographic and socioeconomic factors can predict whether customers use the relational exchange form; psychological factors, such as saving motives and risk attitudes, are also predictors. Results are clearly different for women and men (Paper 3). Finally, financial advisory meetings are found to increase saving volumes and saving products held in stock. The largest effects are found for young customers with low wealth and low profitability to the bank, i.e., customers who initially have low activity levels and thus create a large potential (Paper 4).Limitations include endogeneity problems in general, and selection bias in particular, making it difficult to establish causality, and internal and external validity. Future research should focus on data management, especially building time series with enhanced methods to adjust for selection bias. In addition, studies to better understand the transactional exchange form are needed, as well as studies that deepen the definition of relational exchange, not least when alternative channels to face-to-face meetings include mobile banking and internet banking, and the digitalization of the social know-how of financial advisors.Managerial implications include understanding the relational attributes that affect saving behavior, such as context, duration, and trust. Also useful to know are the factors that can help to predict the probability of a customer’s having a transactional or relational exchange form, i.e., including demographics, socioeconomics, psychology, and gender, to see how channels and customers can be better matched. Policy implications include using the model in this study to match relational attributes to the degree of financial literacy, since the risk of misselling is particularly large for relational-oriented customers with low financial literacy." @default.
• W640975752 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W640975752 creator A5010492806 @default.
• W640975752 creator A5052153371 @default.
• W640975752 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W640975752 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W640975752 title "Do consumers’ relational attributes surface in transaction exchange in financial services?" @default.
• W640975752 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W640975752 type Work @default.
• W640975752 sameAs 640975752 @default.
• W640975752 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W640975752 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W640975752 hasAuthorship W640975752A5010492806 @default.
• W640975752 hasAuthorship W640975752A5052153371 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C139043278 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C164516710 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W640975752 hasConcept C75949130 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C10138342 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C139043278 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C144133560 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C162324750 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C162853370 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C164516710 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C199360897 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C2778012447 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C41008148 @default.
• W640975752 hasConceptScore W640975752C75949130 @default.
• W640975752 hasLocation W6409757521 @default.
• W640975752 hasOpenAccess W640975752 @default.
• W640975752 hasPrimaryLocation W6409757521 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W1001745734 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W1973035979 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W1978466266 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2026999766 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2039434325 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2068775472 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2100904882 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2137276702 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2142435240 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2161621264 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2303212726 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2603692659 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2783940722 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2914821635 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W2963591700 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W3111813349 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W3133739349 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W3180169573 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W588293130 @default.
• W640975752 hasRelatedWork W605604285 @default.
• W640975752 isParatext "false" @default.
• W640975752 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W640975752 magId "640975752" @default.
• W640975752 workType "article" @default.