FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W64690749> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W64690749 abstract "Numerous studies have shown that speakers are sensitive to phonotactic structures which are absent in their native language (Berent & Shimron 1997; Davidson 2000; Moreton 2002; Coetzee 2004; Berent et al. 2006; Albright 2006, 2007). For instance, first language (henceforth, L1) speakers have sonority-related preferences for consonant-consonant (henceforth, CC) onset clusters in nonce words despite the lack of lexical evidence (Davidson 2000; Berent et al. 2006). With respect to the second language (henceforth, L2) acquisition of consonant clusters, it is shown that not all new clusters are equally difficult for L2 learners (Broselow & Finer 1991; Eckman & Iverson 1993; Carlisle 1997, 1998; Hancin-Bhatt & Bhatt 1997). However, apart from Berent et al. (2006), most of the studies on phonotactics are based on production rather than perception. It is not clear whether the preferences for certain phonotactic structures are due to articulatory limitations or to phonological grammars. Therefore, perception tasks were conducted in this study. Following the minimal violation model of Pater (2004), according to which the role of the phonological grammar in perception is to regulate the markedness of representations based on the acoustic signal, marked structures will be regulated to a larger extent than less marked ones. Given the fact that Mandarin Chinese does not allow any complex onsets while Dutch does so, the current study examines the sensitivity of Mandarin Chinese listeners of Dutch and Dutch native listeners to the markedness of illegal Dutch CC onset clusters (tl-, dl-; pm-, km-; fm-, xm-). Experiment 1 tested whether Mandarin Chinese of Dutch and Dutch native listeners had accurate perceptions of Dutch /l/ and /r/. Experiment 2, a syllable number judgment task, examined the effect of vowel epenthesis. Experiments 3 and 4 were comparative wordlikeness judgment tasks, in which the listeners were asked to select a form which was more Dutch-like within a pair of nonce words. The results of the perception tasks suggest that Mandarin Chinese of Dutch and Dutch native listeners have different hidden phonotactic knowledge about the illegal Dutch CC onset clusters. Sonority-wise, markedness constraints play a very important role in both groups of listeners’ perception grammar. Interestingly, the OCP [COR, -cont] constraint is only active in Dutch native listeners’ perception grammar, not Mandarin Chinese. Strikingly, although all the Mandarin Chinese listeners in the tasks were advanced learners of Dutch, they still use their L1 phonotactic grammar to perceive L2 phonotactics. I will adopt Coetzee’s (2004) proposal for comparative tableaux, which is that input ~ output mappings show the learners’ preferences for certain phonotactic structures in comparative wordlikeness judgment tasks. In the present study, I will propose that the hidden phonotactic knowledge of Mandarin Chinese of Dutch and Dutch native listeners can be accounted for by the comparisons of surface ~ lexicon mappings in the comparative perception tableau. In Mandarin Chinese listeners’ perception grammar, the sonority-wise markedness constraints are still ranked higher than the faithfulness constraints in perception. In contrast, in Dutch native listeners’ perception grammar, the faithfulness constraints in perception always outrank the markedness constraints (including sonority-wise constraints and the OCP constraint), which might be due to their rich linguistic experience with the consonant clusters." @default.
• W64690749 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W64690749 creator A5025296117 @default.
• W64690749 date "2008-01-21" @default.
• W64690749 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W64690749 title "Hidden Phonotactic Knowledge of L2 Listeners" @default.
• W64690749 cites W1481063895 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1482677897 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1490117447 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1493515276 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1521703724 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1523050857 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1564039035 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1574557042 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1596715499 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1628323995 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1828629796 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1898626314 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1975099585 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1980862600 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1982147372 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1982680659 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1989004252 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1991904716 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1994492508 @default.
• W64690749 cites W1999257591 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2011238950 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2019575913 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2022465033 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2023567916 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2046110577 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2059824090 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2069106636 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2073610029 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2077439820 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2078046486 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2082444304 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2096883086 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2102080222 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2110898358 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2155767793 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2163132431 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2165919472 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2171637847 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2277415292 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2289074721 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2346703062 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2770013113 @default.
• W64690749 cites W3112453214 @default.
• W64690749 cites W3178156975 @default.
• W64690749 cites W48751805 @default.
• W64690749 cites W2799149788 @default.
• W64690749 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W64690749 type Work @default.
• W64690749 sameAs 64690749 @default.
• W64690749 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W64690749 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W64690749 hasAuthorship W64690749A5025296117 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C138954614 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C148934300 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C154438410 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C26022165 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C2776134746 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C2778203577 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C2779581591 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C4768521 @default.
• W64690749 hasConcept C8137504 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C138885662 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C138954614 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C148934300 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C154438410 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C15744967 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C169760540 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C26022165 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C26760741 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C2776134746 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C2778203577 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C2779581591 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C41895202 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C4768521 @default.
• W64690749 hasConceptScore W64690749C8137504 @default.
• W64690749 hasLocation W646907491 @default.
• W64690749 hasOpenAccess W64690749 @default.
• W64690749 hasPrimaryLocation W646907491 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W1502955194 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W1969066628 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2053617293 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2125362423 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2182427213 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2407998804 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2490725721 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2497347977 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2566879010 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2730664049 @default.
• W64690749 hasRelatedWork W2760150762 @default.

• next