FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W647921149> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W647921149 abstract "COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF TWO COGNITIVE DISSONANCE INTERVENTIONS FOR EATING PATHOLOGY: ARE ONLINE AND FACE-TO-FACE INTERVENTIONS EQUALLY EFFECTIVE? By Kasey Lyn Serdar, M.S. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. Virginia Commonwealth University, 2011 Major Director: Suzanne E. Mazzeo, Ph.D. Associate Professor Counseling Psychology Department Clinical and subclinical eating pathology are common, especially among female undergraduates. Such problems are often chronic and associated with a range of negative medical and psychological outcomes. Thus, it is important to develop effective prevention programs to reduce eating disorder risk. Numerous studies suggest that dissonance-based prevention programs are the most successful in reducing eating disorder risk factors, however, such programs might not be convenient for students limited by scheduling restraints or geographic proximity. Further, some students may be reluctant to attend such groups due to lack of anonymity. One way to address these potential barriers is to adapt dissonance-based programs for online use. However, no extant studies have examined the feasibility of this mode of delivery for dissonance-based programs. The current study examined the effectiveness of an online dissonance-based program, and compared it with traditional face-to-face delivery and assessment-only control conditions. It was hypothesized that: 1) online and face-to-face dissonance programs would produce comparable results; and 2) both of these active treatments would yield improvements in eating disorder outcomes (e.g. reduced thin ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, dieting, negative affect, and eating disorder symptoms) compared with an assessment-only control condition. Results partially supported the original hypotheses. Modified intent-to-treat analyses (MITT) indicated that participants in both the face-to-face and online intervention groups showed less body dissatisfaction at post-intervention assessment compared to assessment only participants. Further, when analyses were conducted using a non-intent-to-treat (non-ITT) approach (examining only the outcomes of participants who completed the intervention), significant post-intervention differences were observed for all outcome variables. Specifically, individuals in both intervention groups showed lower thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, restraint, negative affect, and fewer eating disorder symptoms compared to assessment only participants. This study indicates that there may be some promise in adapting dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs for online use. Future studies should continue to refine online adaptations of such programs and examine the effects of such programs with different populations." @default.
• W647921149 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W647921149 creator A5068178492 @default.
• W647921149 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W647921149 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W647921149 title "Comparing the efficacy of two cognitive dissonance interventions for eating pathology: Are online and face-to-face interventions equally effective?" @default.
• W647921149 cites W1484864026 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1596801600 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1639247225 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1966407672 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1966818302 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1969422958 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1972635096 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1972883514 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1977979641 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1982195602 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1982431698 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1995954297 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1996075725 @default.
• W647921149 cites W1998536100 @default.
• W647921149 cites W20024241 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2002949141 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2005247175 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2008520341 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2011493444 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2014692562 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2017041160 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2022907962 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2024654657 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2029794681 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2031459974 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2032225778 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2038644397 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2038893193 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2040758092 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2048142893 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2057829381 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2061862267 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2067105477 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2069728635 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2072435510 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2075838881 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2076679144 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2084465744 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2084594101 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2086143537 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2102322292 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2112952286 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2127388198 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2128607324 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2134521319 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2135258436 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2135806253 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2161336666 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2166745474 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2318785876 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2400386655 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2415758389 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2480671014 @default.
• W647921149 cites W2905803051 @default.
• W647921149 cites W349839223 @default.
• W647921149 cites W4234043081 @default.
• W647921149 doi "https://doi.org/10.25772/7r84-hz95" @default.
• W647921149 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W647921149 type Work @default.
• W647921149 sameAs 647921149 @default.
• W647921149 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W647921149 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W647921149 hasAuthorship W647921149A5068178492 @default.
• W647921149 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W647921149 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W647921149 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W647921149 hasConcept C2776394216 @default.
• W647921149 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W647921149 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W647921149 hasConcept C77513098 @default.
• W647921149 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W647921149 hasConceptScore W647921149C118552586 @default.
• W647921149 hasConceptScore W647921149C15744967 @default.
• W647921149 hasConceptScore W647921149C27415008 @default.
• W647921149 hasConceptScore W647921149C2776394216 @default.
• W647921149 hasConceptScore W647921149C70410870 @default.
• W647921149 hasConceptScore W647921149C71924100 @default.
• W647921149 hasConceptScore W647921149C77513098 @default.
• W647921149 hasConceptScore W647921149C77805123 @default.
• W647921149 hasLocation W6479211491 @default.
• W647921149 hasOpenAccess W647921149 @default.
• W647921149 hasPrimaryLocation W6479211491 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W1713447052 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2024019898 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2129890123 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2142955320 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2160754511 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2408900001 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2512858132 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2757405999 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2765419245 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2766203002 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2789355496 @default.
• W647921149 hasRelatedWork W2890219712 @default.

• next