FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W648987649> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W648987649 abstract "This project examined the effects of habitat fragmentation on bird assemblages in the Wet Tropics Lowlands. I quantified both landscape and vegetation patterns in the study area, described the bird assemblages, examined the effects of edges on the vegetation and avifauna, and analysed the response of the avifauna to the spatial and vegetation characteristics of fragments. Particular emphasis was given to comparisons between these responses and those of other tropical avifaunas to develop general theory, as the rules that apply in species-rich locations may not apply in highly disturbed, relatively depauperate areas such as the lowlands of northern Queensland. Fine scale vegetation layers along a 70 km long stretch of the Wet Tropics lowlands were created, and from these, landscape indices were calculated to quantify the landscape at patch and landscape scales. Thirty fragments and three locations in continuous rainforest were sampled for vegetation structural attributes and bird assemblages using standard line transects at different distances from patch edges. This region of the lowlands is very heavily fragmented by farming, with only 6.8% forest cover remaining, and most clearing in the region has occurred on alluvial and basalt soils with a slope less than 8°. Vegetation grouped broadly into two major types: complex mesophyll vine forest (with strong cyclone disturbance evident) in the south, and mixed forest in the north. Regression tree analyses suggested that while rainfall strongly influences rainforest structure in a non-linear fashion, differences among drier sites were mainly due to landform while the wetter sites were more influenced by altitude, most likely due to drainage factors. These differences occurred at a larger (landscape) scale rather than at the transect level, except for subtle edge effects. Through ordination, the 27 vegetation variables were reduced to three summary variables that explained 91% of the variation among the sites for later analyses. Overall bird richness (102 species), while low compared to that of most tropical rainforests worldwide, is richer than most upland areas of the Wet Tropics due to greater numbers of open-country species in and around rainforest edges. However, the study area is particularly depauperate in both habitat specialists and feeding specialists compared to upland rainforests in northern Queensland. This is probably due to extinctions during historical rainforest contractions, the distance from source areas such as Papua New Guinea, and the high rates of natural disturbance in the lowlands (favouring more resilient generalists). Bird assemblages in mixed forest differed from those in mesophyll rainforest in having more habitat generalists and fewer rainforest specialists and, among species found in unfragmented forest, rarer species were less able to persist in habitat fragments than more common species. Surprisingly, no differences in canopy connectedness, foliage density or heterogeneity were evident between edge zones and interiors, which were probably due to the severe canopy damage from cyclones across rainforests in the study area rather than just around rainforest edges. Edge zones did, however, contain greater numbers of stems, shrubs, and in particular Lantana camera, but fewer ground ferns, mosses, and climbing palms. The microclimate changes leading to this gradient are probably caused by outside conditions permeating horizontally from the edge, rather than by secondary effects of canopy damage. Total bird richness and abundance did not significantly differ between forest edges and interiors (unlike most other tropical rainforest studies), possibly reflecting the lack of structural vegetation contrast between edges and interiors, the open-country species that utilise the edge, and the generalist nature of the lowland rainforest community. Among guilds, however, some differences were apparent, with greater numbers of open-country species recorded at edges and rainforest specialists tending to favour patch interiors. Edges contained greater densities of frugivores, gramnivores, and nectarivores, whereas interiors contained higher densities of obligate insectivores and understorey species. Except for total richness and abundance, these patterns reflect those from other regions, but to a lesser degree, possibly due to the less diverse and specialised local species pool and to the regular disturbance to this area by cyclones, which appears to limit the strength and extent of microclimate gradients. The major determinants of assemblage structure in isolates were a combination of patch (patch area) and landscape (proportion of rainforest within 1 km) variables. The degree of canopy connectivity, which is largely influenced by cyclone disturbance, also contributed (to a lesser extent) to assemblage structure. At a guild level, open-country species were minimally affected by landscape or patch characteristics, whereas species found in wide ranges of habitats were influenced by both patch and landscape variables. Rainforest specialists, on the other hand, were influenced solely by patch-level variables, including the degree of canopy closure. Of the feeding guilds, only the obligate gramnivores were less species-rich in larger fragments, because this guild comprised entirely open-country species and were concentrated along edges. These avian responses to patch and landscape characteristics are weaker than those of most other tropical assemblages, with smaller patches maintaining a relatively high proportion of species. This is probably due again to the low diversity and specialisation within this avifauna. In effect, those species that would be the most vulnerable to human-induced habitat loss would have already disappeared from previous natural disturbance.In the Wet Tropics, Pleistocene climate fluctuations causing rainforest contractions to small refugia have led to a relatively depauperate and generalist avifauna, which is in turn more robust in the face of a range of anthropogenic disturbances. Hence, regional disturbances have influenced not only the composition of the lowland avifauna, but also the characteristics that make this bird assemblage more resistant to habitat fragmentation at the landscape scale. This study therefore provides an example of one type of change filtering out those species that are vulnerable to quite different human disturbances at different spatial and temporal scales. Some areas of the Wet Tropics lowlands are still threatened by residential, agricultural, and tourism development, and this study has shown that bird assemblages suffer negative consequences from the fragmentation of remaining habitat. However, this avifauna is more resilient than those from diverse regions, so smaller, isolated patches may be of greater conservation value (with regard to the bird assemblage) than might be the case in other regions where assemblages are more diverse and, importantly, species are more specialised." @default.
• W648987649 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W648987649 creator A5046501460 @default.
• W648987649 date "2005-12-01" @default.
• W648987649 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W648987649 title "The effects of habitat fragmentation on bird communities in a naturally disturbed environment: the Wet Tropics lowlands" @default.
• W648987649 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W648987649 type Work @default.
• W648987649 sameAs 648987649 @default.
• W648987649 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W648987649 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W648987649 hasAuthorship W648987649A5046501460 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C124886560 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C191015642 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C198979508 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C50660011 @default.
• W648987649 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C124886560 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C185933670 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C18903297 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C191015642 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C198979508 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C205649164 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C39432304 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C50660011 @default.
• W648987649 hasConceptScore W648987649C86803240 @default.
• W648987649 hasLocation W6489876491 @default.
• W648987649 hasOpenAccess W648987649 @default.
• W648987649 hasPrimaryLocation W6489876491 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W1648802484 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W1963568668 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2010845615 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2013580128 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2027349435 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2106956406 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2157419951 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2168991987 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2183853653 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2258218280 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2266466888 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2335498977 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2383044435 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2510206378 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2774529965 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W2784739479 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W3133880671 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W3173130729 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W54601458 @default.
• W648987649 hasRelatedWork W3145596057 @default.
• W648987649 isParatext "false" @default.
• W648987649 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W648987649 magId "648987649" @default.
• W648987649 workType "dissertation" @default.