FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W652516211> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W652516211 abstract "Background: Although research has proven that eHealth interventions can be effective, one of the largest pitfalls is the high attrition rates common in research and practice in this field. Research proves that usage of an intervention is crucial to benefit from its potential effectiveness. Furthermore, dose-effect relationships are reported in various studies. Nevertheless, research on attrition has only recently gained the deserved attention whereby important concepts are defined. Drop-out attrition is defined as the percentage of respondents not following the research protocol (e.g. not filling out post-test questionnaires) and non-use attrition is defined as the percentage of respondents who have not used the intervention. Closely related is the concept of adherence, which is defined as the percentage of respondents following the intervention protocol (e.g. completing all modules). Research has been undertaken into characteristics of respondents which might explain attrition and adherence, but there is little research into how technology engages users. One of the main advantages of eHealth is the opportunity technology offers to persuade people to use an intervention. It seems plausible that the same characteristics that make eHealth so volatile might provide solutions to engage and captivate users. Objective: Many studies have been conducted on eHealth interventions. Most of these studies have focused on the effectiveness of an intervention, but include information on the features and functions of the intervention and on attrition rates. Our objective is to systematically review the literature to accumulate and synthesize this information into conclusions on how technology contributes to attrition and adherence.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the databases Web of Knowledge, EBSCOHOST, Picarta, Scopus and ScienceDirect. The databases were searched for a combination of the constructs ‘web-based’, ‘intervention’, ‘attrition’ and ‘health’. For each construct, several (6 – 19) keywords were used. Important inclusion criteria were that the intervention was intended to be used repeatedly and was focused on patients and that the research included assessment of effect and information on usage of the intervention.Results: The search yielded 4939 unique titles, of which 347 articles were deemed initially relevant. After title, abstract and full text screening by two researchers, 84 articles were included. Articles studying the same intervention were combined and this yielded a total of 53 unique interventions. First analyses of these interventions show that a variety of features are used of which (psycho)education and tailoring are most common. Adherence is usually low to moderate, with interventions using chronological modules scoring more positively than interventions without a modular structure. Very often, the information on the intervention is insufficient and information on drop-out, non-use and adherence is scarce and unclear.Conclusions: This systematic review provides an opportunity to gain insight into the relationship between the technology used in eHealth interventions and attrition. Thereby it contributes to an emerging understanding and usage of persuasive technology in eHealth. However, research is hampered by unclear reporting of attrition rates and a lack of information on the features and functions of the researched interventions. []" @default.
• W652516211 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W652516211 creator A5010842777 @default.
• W652516211 creator A5026570875 @default.
• W652516211 creator A5069877583 @default.
• W652516211 creator A5083868517 @default.
• W652516211 date "2010-07-08" @default.
• W652516211 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W652516211 title "Technology and Adherence in EHealth: a Systematic Review" @default.
• W652516211 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W652516211 type Work @default.
• W652516211 sameAs 652516211 @default.
• W652516211 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W652516211 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W652516211 hasAuthorship W652516211A5010842777 @default.
• W652516211 hasAuthorship W652516211A5026570875 @default.
• W652516211 hasAuthorship W652516211A5069877583 @default.
• W652516211 hasAuthorship W652516211A5083868517 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C202645933 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C2780553607 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C2984949393 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C4249254 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W652516211 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C142724271 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C15744967 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C159110408 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C160735492 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C162324750 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C199343813 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C202645933 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C204787440 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C27415008 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C2780385302 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C2780553607 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C2780665704 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C2984949393 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C41008148 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C4249254 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C50522688 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C509550671 @default.
• W652516211 hasConceptScore W652516211C71924100 @default.
• W652516211 hasLocation W6525162111 @default.
• W652516211 hasOpenAccess W652516211 @default.
• W652516211 hasPrimaryLocation W6525162111 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W1861221229 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2010165604 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2031625522 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2035228137 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2045485629 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2142257543 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2163871828 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2164367731 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2164749817 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2260146716 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2801287189 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2883067778 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2888512926 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2901978749 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2905228565 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2955751601 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2958186866 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W2972751298 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W3043323578 @default.
• W652516211 hasRelatedWork W3113190780 @default.
• W652516211 isParatext "false" @default.
• W652516211 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W652516211 magId "652516211" @default.
• W652516211 workType "article" @default.