FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W65548969> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W65548969 abstract "Trust plays an important role in the charity sector, as for donors it is difficult to assess whether their money has been used as directed. If the public has little confidence in a charitable organization, they will be less willing to support the organization. As a consequence, for charities it is of importance that their advertisements create trust in order for donors to donate and to continue donating. This study examines several message factors and their influence on people’s trust and intentions to donate to a charitable organization.One way to possibly influence potential donors to contribute to charitable organizations is through communicating the successes of the organization to the public. Another way is by emphasizing what goals the charity yet wants to accomplish in the future. Next to focusing the advertising message on successes or future goals, potential donors can also be influenced by the type of evidence that is presented. In this study a distinction is made between presenting the message with statistical and anecdotal evidence.A study in this field was carried out, to examine the effectiveness of different charity advertisements in relation to trust and donation intention. A 2 (advertising strategy scenarios: future goals versus past successes) by 2 (evidence type: anecdotal versus statistical) between subjects design was used. Four manipulated charity advertisements were used, about a fictive charitable organization that raises money for research into childhood cancer. An online survey was carried out, in which 171 participants from the Netherlands took part. The effects of the advertising strategy scenarios and evidence types were measured on five constructs; trust in the charitable organization, message- and messenger credibility, risk perception and donation intention. Results showed that participants exposed to anecdotal evidence scored statistically significantly higher on trust in the charitable organization as opposed to those exposed to statistical evidence. However, no significant differences were found for message- and messenger credibility, the perceived risk and donation intention between the two evidence types. Results showed no statistically significant differences between participants exposed to charity advertisements that focused on future goals and those exposed to past successes. In addition, also no interaction effects between the advertising strategy scenarios and evidence types were found. Notably, in all four conditions participants scored low on donation intention.The findings of this study provide insight into the effects of evidence types combined with different advertising strategy scenarios in charity fundraising messages, which charitable organizations should take into account when developing advertising messages." @default.
• W65548969 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W65548969 creator A5035449313 @default.
• W65548969 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W65548969 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W65548969 title "Creating trust through charity advertisement : focusing on charity successes or future goals, by using statistical or anecdotal evidence?" @default.
• W65548969 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W65548969 type Work @default.
• W65548969 sameAs 65548969 @default.
• W65548969 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W65548969 countsByYear W655489692016 @default.
• W65548969 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W65548969 hasAuthorship W65548969A5035449313 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C2775933685 @default.
• W65548969 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C10138342 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C112698675 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C144133560 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C15744967 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C17744445 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C182306322 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C199539241 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C2775933685 @default.
• W65548969 hasConceptScore W65548969C39549134 @default.
• W65548969 hasLocation W655489691 @default.
• W65548969 hasOpenAccess W65548969 @default.
• W65548969 hasPrimaryLocation W655489691 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W1532985190 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W1964695928 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2047826176 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W205328249 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2066541618 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2160970009 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2246717290 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2557059738 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2796962438 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2898089123 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2899702016 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2945270451 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2966287232 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2966608521 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2983362919 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W2986476356 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W3048161115 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W3124658115 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W3196048552 @default.
• W65548969 hasRelatedWork W97353569 @default.
• W65548969 isParatext "false" @default.
• W65548969 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W65548969 magId "65548969" @default.
• W65548969 workType "dissertation" @default.