FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W656165303> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W656165303 endingPage "1668" @default.
• W656165303 startingPage "1658" @default.
• W656165303 abstract "Background Retrorectus repairs (RR) of abdominal wall hernias are growing in popularity, yet wound morbidity and predictors in this context have been characterized poorly. Models aimed at predicting wound morbidity typically do not control for technique and/or location of mesh. Our aim was to describe wound morbidity and risk factors specifically in the context of RR hernia repair. Our hypothesis was that the incidence of wound morbidity with mesh sublay would be less than predicted by a model that does not control for mesh position. Methods Consecutive RR hernia repairs with at least a 90-day follow-up were identified in our prospective database and analyzed. The primary outcome measures were the incidence of surgical-site occurrence (SSO) and surgical-site infection (SSI) via modern, standardized definitions. For predictors of SSO, statistical analysis was performed with univariate analysis, χ2, and logistic regression as well as multivariate regression. Results A total of 306 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-four SSOs identified in 72 (23.5%) patients included 48 (15.7%) SSIs, 14 (4.6%) instances of wound cellulitis, 12 (3.9%) skin dehiscences, 6 (2.0%) seromas, and 4 (1.3%) hematomas but no instances of mesh excision or fistula formation. Treatment entailed antibiotics alone in 30 patients, 14 bedside drainage procedures, 9 radiographically assisted drainage procedures, and 10 returns to the operating room for debridement. After multivariate analysis, diabetes (OR 2.41), hernia width >20 cm (OR 2.49), and use of biologic mesh (OR 2.93) were statistically associated with the development of a SSO (P < .05). Notably, the mere presence of contamination was not independently associated with wound morbidity (OR 1.83, P = .11). SSO and SSI rates anticipated by a recent risk prediction model were 50–80% and 17–83%, respectively, compared with our actual rates of 20–46% and 7–32%. Conclusion Based on a large cohort of patients, we identified factors contributing to SSOs specifically for RR hernia repairs. Paradoxically, biologic mesh was an independent predictor of wound morbidity. The development of clinically important mesh complications and rates of wound morbidity less than anticipated by recent predictive models suggest that the retromuscular (sublay) mesh position may be more advantageous. Retrorectus repairs (RR) of abdominal wall hernias are growing in popularity, yet wound morbidity and predictors in this context have been characterized poorly. Models aimed at predicting wound morbidity typically do not control for technique and/or location of mesh. Our aim was to describe wound morbidity and risk factors specifically in the context of RR hernia repair. Our hypothesis was that the incidence of wound morbidity with mesh sublay would be less than predicted by a model that does not control for mesh position. Consecutive RR hernia repairs with at least a 90-day follow-up were identified in our prospective database and analyzed. The primary outcome measures were the incidence of surgical-site occurrence (SSO) and surgical-site infection (SSI) via modern, standardized definitions. For predictors of SSO, statistical analysis was performed with univariate analysis, χ2, and logistic regression as well as multivariate regression. A total of 306 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-four SSOs identified in 72 (23.5%) patients included 48 (15.7%) SSIs, 14 (4.6%) instances of wound cellulitis, 12 (3.9%) skin dehiscences, 6 (2.0%) seromas, and 4 (1.3%) hematomas but no instances of mesh excision or fistula formation. Treatment entailed antibiotics alone in 30 patients, 14 bedside drainage procedures, 9 radiographically assisted drainage procedures, and 10 returns to the operating room for debridement. After multivariate analysis, diabetes (OR 2.41), hernia width >20 cm (OR 2.49), and use of biologic mesh (OR 2.93) were statistically associated with the development of a SSO (P < .05). Notably, the mere presence of contamination was not independently associated with wound morbidity (OR 1.83, P = .11). SSO and SSI rates anticipated by a recent risk prediction model were 50–80% and 17–83%, respectively, compared with our actual rates of 20–46% and 7–32%. Based on a large cohort of patients, we identified factors contributing to SSOs specifically for RR hernia repairs. Paradoxically, biologic mesh was an independent predictor of wound morbidity. The development of clinically important mesh complications and rates of wound morbidity less than anticipated by recent predictive models suggest that the retromuscular (sublay) mesh position may be more advantageous." @default.
• W656165303 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W656165303 creator A5003939699 @default.
• W656165303 creator A5023776299 @default.
• W656165303 creator A5031235726 @default.
• W656165303 creator A5047093371 @default.
• W656165303 creator A5061445815 @default.
• W656165303 creator A5071448750 @default.
• W656165303 date "2015-12-01" @default.
• W656165303 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W656165303 title "Risk factors for wound morbidity after open retromuscular (sublay) hernia repair" @default.
• W656165303 cites W188078319 @default.
• W656165303 cites W1964726553 @default.
• W656165303 cites W1969935782 @default.
• W656165303 cites W1972205227 @default.
• W656165303 cites W1974384139 @default.
• W656165303 cites W1983945308 @default.
• W656165303 cites W1993888273 @default.
• W656165303 cites W1995418706 @default.
• W656165303 cites W1995552317 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2001458414 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2012658302 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2014843882 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2015844387 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2016121237 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2019713029 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2022360387 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2022959038 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2024831490 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2029189228 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2030335202 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2038064535 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2041481041 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2050167506 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2054104615 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2060076163 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2063527627 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2064593336 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2065886769 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2066127484 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2067729111 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2073121758 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2078969276 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2085795889 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2086192027 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2087530747 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2090240666 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2093584659 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2094362223 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2109243238 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2112515533 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2120107407 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2121618693 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2132021743 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2138101929 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2155152078 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2160092599 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2163572399 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2166486254 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2169449518 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2319487928 @default.
• W656165303 cites W2320067637 @default.
• W656165303 cites W269562699 @default.
• W656165303 cites W28507198 @default.
• W656165303 cites W4239238290 @default.
• W656165303 cites W4321060064 @default.
• W656165303 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.003" @default.
• W656165303 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26100569" @default.
• W656165303 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W656165303 type Work @default.
• W656165303 sameAs 656165303 @default.
• W656165303 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032015 @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032016 @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032017 @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032018 @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032019 @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032020 @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032021 @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032022 @default.
• W656165303 countsByYear W6561653032023 @default.
• W656165303 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W656165303 hasAuthorship W656165303A5003939699 @default.
• W656165303 hasAuthorship W656165303A5023776299 @default.
• W656165303 hasAuthorship W656165303A5031235726 @default.
• W656165303 hasAuthorship W656165303A5047093371 @default.
• W656165303 hasAuthorship W656165303A5061445815 @default.
• W656165303 hasAuthorship W656165303A5071448750 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C144301174 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C2776341189 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C2777238321 @default.
• W656165303 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.

• next