Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W658527364> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 55 of
55
with 100 items per page.
- W658527364 endingPage "0736" @default.
- W658527364 startingPage "34" @default.
- W658527364 abstract "The design arts -- from the design of buildings and machines to software and interfaces -- are associated with types of knowledge and performance thought to be structured, modular, and systematic. Such arts have become increasingly prestigious in our technocratic society. Since Aristotle, the art of rhetoric was conceived as a loosely structured art thought to be limited in the extent to which it could mimic more precise subject matters. The art of rhetoric has been controversial since classical times, but its status has sunk even lower since the industrial revolution -- a point when civic cultures began to cede authority and control to the cultures of specialized experts. Many sympathizers of rhetoric have resisted its decline by calling for a civic art of public discourse to stand in opposition to a technocratic specialized discourse that has come, increasingly, to disenfranchise the ordinary citizen. This is the first book to question the rhetoric/technical knowledge split from a more fundamental perspective. To get some perspective on what is at stake in rhetoric's traditional classification as a art, the authors: * explore the distinction between practical and design arts; * enumerate the various criteria cited in the literature for qualifying a cluster of knowledge and performative skills to count as an art of design; * show how the knowledge and performative skills associated with the art of rhetoric meet the major requirements of design knowledge; * propose a general architecture of rhetorical design, one descriptive both of civic address and specialized academic argument; * turn to the Lincoln/Douglas debates to embody and provide some empirical support and illustration for their architecture; * demonstrate how Lincoln and Douglas can be thought of as expert designers whose rhetoric is highly structured and modular; and * explain how the rhetoric of both rhetorical agents can be represented in the layers and modules that one needs to display plans for buildings, software, or other design artifacts. These layers and modules are not just post hoc annotations of the debates; they also illuminate new and systematic ways for viewing the debates -- and by implication, other specimens of rhetoric -- in terms of strategies of artistic production. Kaufer and Butler conclude their presentation by citing some of the research and educational implications that follow from housing rhetoric within the family of design arts." @default.
- W658527364 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W658527364 creator A5013022885 @default.
- W658527364 creator A5086309699 @default.
- W658527364 date "1996-10-01" @default.
- W658527364 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W658527364 title "Rhetoric and the arts of design" @default.
- W658527364 doi "https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-0736" @default.
- W658527364 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
- W658527364 type Work @default.
- W658527364 sameAs 658527364 @default.
- W658527364 citedByCount "28" @default.
- W658527364 countsByYear W6585273642012 @default.
- W658527364 countsByYear W6585273642013 @default.
- W658527364 countsByYear W6585273642014 @default.
- W658527364 countsByYear W6585273642017 @default.
- W658527364 countsByYear W6585273642020 @default.
- W658527364 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W658527364 hasAuthorship W658527364A5013022885 @default.
- W658527364 hasAuthorship W658527364A5086309699 @default.
- W658527364 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W658527364 hasConcept C1370556 @default.
- W658527364 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W658527364 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W658527364 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
- W658527364 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W658527364 hasConcept C70789860 @default.
- W658527364 hasConceptScore W658527364C124952713 @default.
- W658527364 hasConceptScore W658527364C1370556 @default.
- W658527364 hasConceptScore W658527364C138885662 @default.
- W658527364 hasConceptScore W658527364C142362112 @default.
- W658527364 hasConceptScore W658527364C153349607 @default.
- W658527364 hasConceptScore W658527364C41895202 @default.
- W658527364 hasConceptScore W658527364C70789860 @default.
- W658527364 hasIssue "02" @default.
- W658527364 hasLocation W6585273641 @default.
- W658527364 hasOpenAccess W658527364 @default.
- W658527364 hasPrimaryLocation W6585273641 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W1989312933 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W2030055420 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W2100339188 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W2505267254 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W2558915010 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W2792041581 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W4200301494 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W613524881 @default.
- W658527364 hasRelatedWork W2173917099 @default.
- W658527364 hasVolume "34" @default.
- W658527364 isParatext "false" @default.
- W658527364 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W658527364 magId "658527364" @default.
- W658527364 workType "article" @default.