FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W66561949> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W66561949 abstract "The objective of this study was to test and validate electromagnetic scanning of whole pork carcasses in an on-line, integrated, industrial configuration. The electromagnetic (EM) scanner was installed in two pork processing facilities (Plant A and Plant B). Plant A was a small pork fabrication plant that further processed chilled pork carcasses. Carcasses were delivered to Plant A by refrigerated trucks. The amount of EM energy absorbed by the carcasses was recorded as they were conveyed through the EM field. A plot of the absorption units over time (EM scan curve) was used to obtain predictive variables for estimating carcass and primal cut composition. Forty-eight whole, chilled carcasses (Group A) were electromagnetically scanned and conveyed onto the fabrication line. The average percentage carcass lean for Group A was 49.1% (range = 36.5 to 59.5%). Right carcass sides were removed from the processing line, fabricated into primal cuts, and dissected into fat, lean, and bone. Prediction equations were developed from EM scans for weight of total dissected carcass lean (R2 = .830; root mean square error = 1.80 kg), percentage of carcass lean (R2 = .820; root mean square error = 2.29%), and weight of dissected ham, longissimus muscle, and shoulder lean. In Plant B, the electromagnetic scanner was installed at the end of a pork slaughter line to ensure carcass scanning at a consistent carcass temperature. Fifty whole, pre-rigor eviscerated carcasses (Group B) were electromagnetically scanned before entering the chill cooler where fat and loin tissue depths were obtained by an optical grading probe. The average percentage carcass lean for Group B was 46.7% (range = 30.1 to 57.3%). Prediction equations were developed from EM scans for weight of total dissected carcass lean (R2 = .904; root mean square error = 1.59 kg), percentage of carcass lean (R2 = .863; root mean square error = 2.05%), and weight of dissected ham, loin, and shoulder lean. Statistical equations developed for the prediction of dissected primal cut lean were superior from EM scans of Group B (prerigor) carcasses. Electromagnetic scanning proved more statistically efficient than optical probes for predicting weight of dissected carcass lean and percentage of carcass lean. Statistical comparison of EM scan equations from Groups A and B are not completely valid because two different populations of carcasses were tested at different times of the year. The results of this study show that EM scanning has the potential to accurately predict pork carcass composition in a fully automated, on-line industrial configuration." @default.
• W66561949 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W66561949 creator A5039382129 @default.
• W66561949 creator A5044196442 @default.
• W66561949 creator A5074540070 @default.
• W66561949 date "1994-10-01" @default.
• W66561949 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W66561949 title "Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration3" @default.
• W66561949 doi "https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72102642x" @default.
• W66561949 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7883623" @default.
• W66561949 hasPublicationYear "1994" @default.
• W66561949 type Work @default.
• W66561949 sameAs 66561949 @default.
• W66561949 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W66561949 countsByYear W665619492012 @default.
• W66561949 countsByYear W665619492013 @default.
• W66561949 countsByYear W665619492015 @default.
• W66561949 countsByYear W665619492016 @default.
• W66561949 countsByYear W665619492017 @default.
• W66561949 countsByYear W665619492018 @default.
• W66561949 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W66561949 hasAuthorship W66561949A5039382129 @default.
• W66561949 hasAuthorship W66561949A5044196442 @default.
• W66561949 hasAuthorship W66561949A5074540070 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C147583825 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C2777449483 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C2779751349 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C2910166804 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C2994380767 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C3017965810 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C3020755666 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W66561949 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C120665830 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C121332964 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C134018914 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C140793950 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C147583825 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C2777449483 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C2779751349 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C2910166804 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C2994380767 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C3017965810 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C3020755666 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C33923547 @default.
• W66561949 hasConceptScore W66561949C86803240 @default.
• W66561949 hasLocation W665619491 @default.
• W66561949 hasLocation W665619492 @default.
• W66561949 hasOpenAccess W66561949 @default.
• W66561949 hasPrimaryLocation W665619491 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W1964201507 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W1982501407 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W1989545051 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W2007334535 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W2136682941 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W2154101026 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W2351418754 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W2588114030 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W3082666212 @default.
• W66561949 hasRelatedWork W66561949 @default.
• W66561949 isParatext "false" @default.
• W66561949 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W66561949 magId "66561949" @default.
• W66561949 workType "article" @default.