FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W6682457> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W6682457 startingPage "81" @default.
• W6682457 abstract "Student evaluations of instruction (SEIs) are assessment tools typically administered at the end of a university semester as a means of providing information to the instructor and the administration regarding the professor's teaching ability over the duration of the semester. The results of the SEIs can have far-reaching implications for the faculty member's academic career and potentially for the academic unit as well as the institution. An important question that needs to be answered and was the focus of the current research is at what point during the semester do students form enduring impressions of the instructor, as measured by the SEIs. Interest in determining at what point students form lasting impressions of the instructor is not a new question. Previous researchers have examined the effect of information received before being exposed to the instructor on subsequent evaluations of the instructor. We have operationally defined this as instructor reputation. When the instructor's reputation was manipulated in the form of positive or negative primes (warm or cold) it did affect subsequent student evaluations of that instructor (Kelly, 1950; Wheeler, Wright & Frost, 2005; Widmeyer & Loy, 1988). Babad, Kaplowitz, and Darley (1999) found that positive and negative primes did affect subsequent student evaluations of the instructor early in the students' experience of the instructor, but the effect did not persist to the end of the semester evaluations. Griffin (2001) found that students' self report regarding information received regarding an instructor's reputation did affect end-of-semester evaluations of instruction. McClelland (1970) found that students' knowledge of previous student evaluations of an instructor influenced students' evaluations of instruction when they were presented at the time the students completed the evaluations. Contrary to these findings (most of which were experimental and not field-based studies), Buchert, Laws, Apperson, and Bregman (2008) found that the instructor's reputation, measured by SEIs administered before ever experiencing the instructor in the class, was not related to evaluations of the instructor at the end of the semester of instruction. Buchert et al. (2008) also examined the influence of students' first impressions of the instructor on end-of-course SEIs. They administered SEIs after 2 weeks of exposure to the instructor and again at the end of the semester. They found a high level of agreement between the two administrations. This suggests that students make evaluations of instructors' competence based on some, though relatively brief, exposure to the instructor early in the semester that remains stable throughout the semester. Just how brief may the exposure be for students to form lasting impressions of instructors? Ambady and Rosenthal (1992) conducted a meta-analysis of 38 studies of expressive behavior in a variety of areas in clinical and social psychology. They found that participants were able to accurately predict several psychological constructs given short exposure (thin slices) to the stimulus person's expressive behavior. In another Ambady and Rosenthal (1993) study, participants rated videotapes of nonverbal behavior of instructors. The researchers found a high correlation between independent judges' ratings and participants' assessment of the instructors' personality characteristics based on watching as little as 6 s of the videotape. Babad, Avni-Babad, and Rosenthal (2004) showed non-verbal video clips of instructors. The researchers found that, after participants viewed the first minute of class, their ratings of instructors on three psychological scales were not related to the post-course evaluations of the instructor. However, participants' ratings of the instructor after viewing a brief video (some as short as 9 s) of the instructor lecturing the class were related to the end-of-semester evaluations of instruction, especially on items related to the instructor's expressive and instructional style. …" @default.
• W6682457 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W6682457 creator A5017278707 @default.
• W6682457 creator A5022272468 @default.
• W6682457 creator A5067732957 @default.
• W6682457 creator A5086232605 @default.
• W6682457 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W6682457 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W6682457 title "Student Evaluations of Instruction: When Are Enduring First Impressions Formed?" @default.
• W6682457 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W6682457 type Work @default.
• W6682457 sameAs 6682457 @default.
• W6682457 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W6682457 countsByYear W66824572013 @default.
• W6682457 countsByYear W66824572014 @default.
• W6682457 countsByYear W66824572016 @default.
• W6682457 countsByYear W66824572018 @default.
• W6682457 countsByYear W66824572019 @default.
• W6682457 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W6682457 hasAuthorship W6682457A5017278707 @default.
• W6682457 hasAuthorship W6682457A5022272468 @default.
• W6682457 hasAuthorship W6682457A5067732957 @default.
• W6682457 hasAuthorship W6682457A5086232605 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C2775969163 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C2777667586 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W6682457 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C142362112 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C144024400 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C145420912 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C15744967 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C166957645 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C2775969163 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C2776035688 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C2777667586 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C36289849 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C46312422 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C48798503 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C509550671 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C52119013 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C71924100 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C77805123 @default.
• W6682457 hasConceptScore W6682457C95457728 @default.
• W6682457 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W6682457 hasLocation W66824571 @default.
• W6682457 hasOpenAccess W6682457 @default.
• W6682457 hasPrimaryLocation W66824571 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W131183169 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W1592777024 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W1979729735 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2020232241 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2027079926 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2064501688 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2081083231 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2081442985 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2088764045 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2169241418 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2298704468 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2314458307 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2414698877 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2516374214 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W254056212 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2765123470 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W2993613275 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W3163126822 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W794217743 @default.
• W6682457 hasRelatedWork W99741378 @default.
• W6682457 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W6682457 isParatext "false" @default.
• W6682457 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W6682457 magId "6682457" @default.
• W6682457 workType "article" @default.