FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W66866197> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W66866197 endingPage "48" @default.
• W66866197 startingPage "31" @default.
• W66866197 abstract "The goal of this essay is two-fold: to make a plea for the theoretical and methodological importance and fruitfulness of meta-argumentation in general, and for approaching from the viewpoint of meta-argumentation a particular topic that is especially relevant for reasons other than methodology and theory. The general aim is pursued by summarizing some past work which follows what I call the historical-textual approach to the study of argumentation, and describing an ongoing project which extends that approach into the new subject matter of meta-argumentation. The historical-textual approach studies actual texts that contain explicit argumentation about historically or perennially significant issues, and reaches or tests theoretical claims based thereupon. The meta-argumentation project proposes to follow the same approach with regard to meta-arguments. These are arguments about arguments, and are distinguished from ground-level arguments. Although they have been studied implicitly in many scholarly works and explicitly in some, they have not been studied systematically. Such a study would be fruitful partly because it would offer an understanding of a special class of arguments. Moreover, it would be a distinctive way of doing argumentation theory in general, since theorizing about arguments is essentially arguing about arguments. Such points are elaborated in the context of summarizing past work that provides analyses, interpretations, and evaluations of the meta-arguments advanced by various argumentation theorists on such topics as: definitions of the concept of argument, methods for the formal criticism of arguments, deep disagreements or intractable quarrels, and conductive arguments or pro-and-con arguments. The particular aim is pursued by motivating the project of a meta-argumentative analysis of a book entitled Apologia (1581), by William of Orange (“the Silent”). William was a leader of the sixteenth-century revolt of the Low Countries against Spain, which resulted in the establishment of the Netherlands as an independent country. In 1580, Philip II, King of Spain, had issued a proclamation calling for the William’s banishment and/or assassination. The Apologia attempts to justify William personally and the Dutch revolt generally against Philip’s arguments. It is significant because it is a classic document in the struggle for freedom of religion, national liberation, and the democratic ideal, and because it anticipates by two centuries the American declaration of independence. This particular “Dutch” project is motivated by conceiving it as a case study of the historical-textual approach, applied to famous meta-arguments; these are classic arguments by famous figures in history which deal with significant issues and which happen to be meta-arguments. In fact, my past studies of famous meta-arguments are encouraging. These have examined: John Stuart Mill’s plea for freedom of thought in On Liberty, chapter 2; Mill’s preliminary argument against the subjection of women and in favor of women’s liberation and equality in The Subjection of Women, chapter 1; and David Hume’s critique of the design argument for the existence of God as the intelligent designer of the universe, in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion." @default.
• W66866197 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W66866197 creator A5022111923 @default.
• W66866197 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W66866197 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W66866197 title "Meta-argumentation: Prolegomena to a Dutch Project" @default.
• W66866197 cites W1515552118 @default.
• W66866197 cites W1556116949 @default.
• W66866197 cites W1560073556 @default.
• W66866197 cites W1576216411 @default.
• W66866197 cites W1583824866 @default.
• W66866197 cites W1702479143 @default.
• W66866197 cites W1969012618 @default.
• W66866197 cites W2024777577 @default.
• W66866197 cites W2097702105 @default.
• W66866197 cites W2102051927 @default.
• W66866197 cites W2168856578 @default.
• W66866197 cites W2485235679 @default.
• W66866197 cites W2487073362 @default.
• W66866197 cites W2506233687 @default.
• W66866197 cites W4211139848 @default.
• W66866197 cites W4214913332 @default.
• W66866197 cites W4242301402 @default.
• W66866197 cites W4244316567 @default.
• W66866197 cites W4251075132 @default.
• W66866197 cites W1585861394 @default.
• W66866197 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_3" @default.
• W66866197 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W66866197 type Work @default.
• W66866197 sameAs 66866197 @default.
• W66866197 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W66866197 countsByYear W668661972014 @default.
• W66866197 countsByYear W668661972018 @default.
• W66866197 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W66866197 hasAuthorship W66866197A5022111923 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C2777212361 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C2777886440 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C65059942 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W66866197 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C111472728 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C138885662 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C144024400 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C166957645 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C17744445 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C185592680 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C199539241 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C2777212361 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C2777886440 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C2779343474 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C41008148 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C55493867 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C65059942 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C7991579 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C95457728 @default.
• W66866197 hasConceptScore W66866197C98184364 @default.
• W66866197 hasLocation W668661971 @default.
• W66866197 hasOpenAccess W66866197 @default.
• W66866197 hasPrimaryLocation W668661971 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W1493131192 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W1581876134 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W1608791421 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W2018745586 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W2083007055 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W2166139333 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W2279877561 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W2373713487 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W2580045618 @default.
• W66866197 hasRelatedWork W74112647 @default.
• W66866197 isParatext "false" @default.
• W66866197 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W66866197 magId "66866197" @default.
• W66866197 workType "book-chapter" @default.