FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W6817802> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W6817802 abstract "This dissertation uses the guiding theoretical frameworks of Social Exchange Theory, Resource Dependency Theory, and Advocacy Coalition Framework to examine the federal public policy advocacy agendas and activities of national tourism-related associations in the United States. The research questions were: (a) What are the roles and motivations of tourism-related associations that engage in advocacy? (b) How are organizational resources used to develop tourism policy? (c) How are tourism policy advocacy coalitions managed? (d) Under what circumstances do those involved in tourism advocacy cooperate with each other? (e) How are tourism policy agendas developed? (f) What are the public policy preferences, at the federal level, of tourism associations in the United States? Looking through a post-positivist lens of critical realism, research questions were answered using the qualitative research methods of content analysis and in-depth personal interviews. Industry sectors contained in the Travel Economic Impact Model (TEIM) served as the framework to organize the search for tourism-related associations. TEIM contains seven categories and 18 sub-categories of tourism activities, based on North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. Data from Encyclopedia of Associations and other sources indicated specific associations classified by NAICS codes included in the TEIM. These efforts revealed a universe of 229 nationally-focused tourism-related associations. Fifty-four associations comprised the sample. Thirty sample organizations were involved in federal public policy advocacy, from which the public policy agendas were content-analyzed. A total of 20 government affairs executives from sample organizations with public policy agendas provided data via in-depth personal interviews. Fifteen interviewees were associated with organizations in Washington, DC. Five executives from organizations located outside the Washington, DC area were interviewed via telephone. Data indicated tourism associations engaged in advocacy formed coalitions to advance their public policy agendas. Cooperation among coalitions centered on similar policy preferences. Organizations with similar policy preferences and complementary resources formed coalitions. Financial wherewithal, the reputation of an organization and its affiliates, an organization’s membership base, and an organization’s knowledge were resources association used to complement attributes of coalition partners. Disagreements, personalities, mistrust, and occasionally working on opposing coalitions impeded cooperation among coalition members.According to sample data and supported by existing theory, policy preferences compelled tourism policy coalitions while association resources regulated progression toward policy objectives. Sample organizations typically behaved as the guiding theoretical frameworks prescribe. However, data revealed tourism advocacy associations also exhibited other behaviors not explained well by existing theory in…" @default.
• W6817802 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W6817802 creator A5045257277 @default.
• W6817802 date "2010-04-30" @default.
• W6817802 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W6817802 title "The Tourism Policy Puzzle: Pieces and Precepts Discovered Through Qualitative Investigation of Federal Public Policy Preferences and Advocacy Activities of Tourism Associations in the United States" @default.
• W6817802 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W6817802 type Work @default.
• W6817802 sameAs 6817802 @default.
• W6817802 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W6817802 crossrefType "book" @default.
• W6817802 hasAuthorship W6817802A5045257277 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C109986646 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C18918823 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W6817802 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C109986646 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C138885662 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C17744445 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C18918823 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C199539241 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C2778137410 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C3116431 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C39549134 @default.
• W6817802 hasConceptScore W6817802C41895202 @default.
• W6817802 hasLocation W68178021 @default.
• W6817802 hasOpenAccess W6817802 @default.
• W6817802 hasPrimaryLocation W68178021 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2000473295 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2020243882 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2034733132 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2078049898 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2093606461 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2108047561 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2124577292 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2136312163 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2142041780 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2158542841 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2165996767 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2469878607 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2518936697 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2600904579 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2765920792 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2901832965 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W29200988 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W2988353257 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W3125866944 @default.
• W6817802 hasRelatedWork W3171052128 @default.
• W6817802 isParatext "false" @default.
• W6817802 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W6817802 magId "6817802" @default.
• W6817802 workType "book" @default.