FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W68899714> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W68899714 abstract "This paper is the first in a series that examines the way health services are funded and delivered in other nations. The nations profiled all aim to achieve the noble goal of Canada’s health care system: access to high quality care regardless of ability to pay. How they organize to achieve that goal differs markedly from the Canadian approach. So do their performances and results.The first nation studied in this series is Australia. The Australian health care system provides some of the best outcomes when compared with other developed nations that have universal approaches to health care insurance. A careful examination of the Australian health care system will provide insights and information that will be useful in the Canadian debate over the future of Medicare.Health system performance — Canada compared to Australia: Looking at factors such as the ability of the health care system to provide healthy longevity, low levels of mortality from disease, and effective treatment for both chronic and terminal illnesses, it seems the Australian health care system broadly performs at a level similar, if not superior, to that in Canada. Specifically, the Canadian health care system outperforms the Australia’s in four of 13 measures examined: two of three measures of primary care performance, and two of five measures of patient safety. Conversely, the Australian health care system outperforms the Canada’s in eight measures: infant mortality, mortality amenable to health care, two of three measures of in-hospital mortality, one of three measures of primary care performance, and three of five measures of patient safety.Lessons for Canada: The combination of superior access to health care and potentially superior health outcomes for substantially lower cost suggests there is much Canadians can learn from the Australian health care system. Importantly, emulating the Australian health care system would not require a marked departure from the current tax-funded, provincially managed, federally supported health care system in Canada. An Australian approach to health care in Canada would primarily require important changes to financial flows within provincial tax-funded systems, a greater reliance on competition and private ownership, and public support for private insurance cover.The Australian health care system departs from the Canadian model in the following important ways: cost sharing for outpatient medical services; some private provision of hospital and surgical services; activity-based funding for hospital care; broad private, parallel health care sector with taxpayer support and dual practice.Of these core policy differences, three can be implemented by Canada’s provinces without violating the letter of the Canada Health Act (CHA): private hospital services and surgical facilities; activity-based funding; and public support for private insurance coverage with dual practice." @default.
• W68899714 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W68899714 creator A5032054234 @default.
• W68899714 creator A5065116833 @default.
• W68899714 date "2013-08-01" @default.
• W68899714 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W68899714 title "Health Care Lessons from Australia" @default.
• W68899714 cites W1483026916 @default.
• W68899714 cites W1504706746 @default.
• W68899714 cites W1579783522 @default.
• W68899714 cites W2118353413 @default.
• W68899714 cites W2246064732 @default.
• W68899714 cites W2319652214 @default.
• W68899714 cites W2790056427 @default.
• W68899714 cites W3122635772 @default.
• W68899714 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W68899714 type Work @default.
• W68899714 sameAs 68899714 @default.
• W68899714 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W68899714 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W68899714 hasAuthorship W68899714A5032054234 @default.
• W68899714 hasAuthorship W68899714A5065116833 @default.
• W68899714 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W68899714 hasConcept C147268084 @default.
• W68899714 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W68899714 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W68899714 hasConcept C47344431 @default.
• W68899714 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W68899714 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W68899714 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W68899714 hasConceptScore W68899714C144133560 @default.
• W68899714 hasConceptScore W68899714C147268084 @default.
• W68899714 hasConceptScore W68899714C160735492 @default.
• W68899714 hasConceptScore W68899714C162324750 @default.
• W68899714 hasConceptScore W68899714C47344431 @default.
• W68899714 hasConceptScore W68899714C50522688 @default.
• W68899714 hasConceptScore W68899714C71924100 @default.
• W68899714 hasConceptScore W68899714C99454951 @default.
• W68899714 hasLocation W688997141 @default.
• W68899714 hasOpenAccess W68899714 @default.
• W68899714 hasPrimaryLocation W688997141 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W1495408637 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W1503324395 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W1576515867 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W1882538749 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2014555154 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2018219309 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2065872946 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2077054065 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2080214191 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2158908388 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2271624969 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2314550447 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2411016912 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W27869715 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2886663278 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W3122888537 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W3174107040 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W74802733 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W93944115 @default.
• W68899714 hasRelatedWork W2736676488 @default.
• W68899714 isParatext "false" @default.
• W68899714 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W68899714 magId "68899714" @default.
• W68899714 workType "article" @default.