FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W69908405> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W69908405 startingPage "255" @default.
• W69908405 abstract "The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education1 has purportedly also been a landmark in special education law. More specifically, most of the leading texts on this subject2 characterize it rather prominently as the first major special education law development.1 Moreover, some of these texts also attribute to Brown the Individuals Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) concept of restrictive environment (LRE).4 The purpose of this study is to determine whether the published5 hearing/review officer and court decisions in special education6 support this professed landmark role, at least in terms of their explicit mention of and reliance on Brown. The method comprised four successive steps: 1) a term search of the INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION LAW REPORT (IDELR), which is the most comprehensive and specialized database for hearing/review officer and court decisions in special education; 2) follow-up term searches of WESTLAW and LEXIS for any additional cases that mentioned Brown in their opinion, including footnotes; 3) a review of each identified decision to determine the role, if any, that Brown played in the decisions; and 4) a synthesis of the findings into successively pertinent categories and, where warranted, a tabular analysis. The first part of the Article summarizes the relevant features of the Brown decision. The remaining parts present the results of sifting the published decisions where one or more of the plaintiffs was a special education student, yielding successive layers, or categories, of first marginal, then more special education decisions.7 Specifically, the second part tracks, both pre- and post-IDEA, the mention of Brown in the race-based cases, i.e., those where the plaintiffs represented racial minority students and the court based its decision primarily or entirely on the equal protection clause or Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.8 The third part traces the explicit use of Brown in another quasi-special education category, consisting of those cases where the court based its decision on neither racial nor disability grounds. Finally, the fourth part canvasses the explicit use of Brown in the core pure category of special education litigation,9 referring to decisions based on the IDEA, correlative state special education laws, and the overlapping disability nondiscrimination statutes-section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans Disabilities Act (ADA).10 Said final part encompasses two phases: a) decisions before, and legislative history of, the IDEA, and b) decisions after the IDEA. I. BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION The Supreme Court in Brown I held that government-sponsored racial segregation, in this case manifested in clearly separate and purportedly equal educational facilities for African-American and white students, violates the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.11 The Court clarified that the basis for its decision was not the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause, finding instead that the equal protection clause provided sufficient support for its conclusion that such separation is inherently unequal.12 In dicta, the Court commented: Today, education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments . . . . It is the very foundation of good citizenship.13 Directly thereafter, the Court added further dicta, which addresses a separable equal-opportunity concept, that [s]uch an opportunity, where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be available to all on equal terms.14 Adding no additional relevant analysis, Brown II effectuated Brown I, remanding the matter to the trial court level for implementation with all deliberate speed.15 II. RACE-BASED MARGINAL CASES The case law contains two marginally relevant subcategories concerning the intersection of race and disability. The first and much larger subcategory consists of racial desegregation cases directly proceeding from Brown I and II that included provisions for students disabilities or special education. …" @default.
• W69908405 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W69908405 creator A5061025573 @default.
• W69908405 date "2005-04-01" @default.
• W69908405 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W69908405 title "Does Brown V. Board of Education Play a Prominent Role in Special Education Law" @default.
• W69908405 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W69908405 type Work @default.
• W69908405 sameAs 69908405 @default.
• W69908405 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W69908405 countsByYear W699084052014 @default.
• W69908405 countsByYear W699084052020 @default.
• W69908405 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W69908405 hasAuthorship W69908405A5061025573 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C2777189325 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C2778381420 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C2779614053 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C2780297707 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C28858896 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C516687495 @default.
• W69908405 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C138885662 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C144024400 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C154945302 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C170706310 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C17744445 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C199539241 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C2777189325 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C2778272461 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C2778381420 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C2779614053 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C2780297707 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C28858896 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C41008148 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C41895202 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C516687495 @default.
• W69908405 hasConceptScore W69908405C97460637 @default.
• W69908405 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W69908405 hasLocation W699084051 @default.
• W69908405 hasOpenAccess W69908405 @default.
• W69908405 hasPrimaryLocation W699084051 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W105809244 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W126873291 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W151581798 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W1534593422 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W1591768775 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W1867821508 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W199207360 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W2015284863 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W2076609922 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W2282742392 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W2320549902 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W2323841440 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W2529496779 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W2781674255 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W281926872 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W3121385498 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W3187396156 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W41001776 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W43536897 @default.
• W69908405 hasRelatedWork W98802507 @default.
• W69908405 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W69908405 isParatext "false" @default.
• W69908405 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W69908405 magId "69908405" @default.
• W69908405 workType "article" @default.