FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W70261837> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W70261837 startingPage "5" @default.
• W70261837 abstract "Executive Summary Following Institute of Medicine's publication of seminal work To Err is Human: Building Safer Health System, researchers began exploring patient safety from variety of perspectives. Yet few studies have asked front-line care providers about their perceptions of health care attributes that facilitate or present barriers to patient safety. The present study examined qualitative data collected in larger study of patient and health care provider perceptions of patient safety. This study focuses on responses to two open-ended questions from survey of employees working at three hospitals (n=1,098). One question asked about conditions respondents felt increased chances for medical errors, and other asked about conditions that decreased chances for errors. Results indicated consistent themes across three hospitals, although relative importance of some themes differed across hospitals. Staffing was top concern across each hospital when it came to conditions respondents felt could lead to an increase in medical errors, and policies and procedures was second. However, policies and procedures was considered top approach that decreased medical errors across all three hospitals. Despite common factors, some themes unique to each hospital were found. Results suggest that regular, anonymous, qualitative feedback from care providers could be useful diagnostic tool for understanding organizational attributes that increase or decrease chances for preventable adverse medical events. Introduction Patient safety means that people can expect to receive health care with minimal risk of encountering preventable adverse medical event or medical error. Medical error has been described as a chronic threat to public health, as lethal as breast cancer, motor vehicle accidents, or AIDS... (Berwick, 2002, p.81). Unfortunately, risk of death by medical error has become one of nation's leading causes of death. The number of deaths each year in United States due to preventable medical errors has been likened to the equivalent of three jumbo jets crashing every two days (seeker-Walker & Taylor Adams, 2001, p. 419). Following Institute of Medicine's (IOM) publication of seminal work To Err is Human: Building Safer Health System (Kohn, Corrigan & Donaldson, 2000), researchers began exploring patient safety from variety of perspectives (James, 2005; Leape & Berwick, 2005). Much patient safety research has revolved around investigation of clinical indicators. This research is often based on retrospective root cause analysis following serious adverse medical event (Reason, 2001). Root cause analysis often uncovers series of latent errors, none of which could have caused event on its own (Chassin & Becher, 2002; Leape, Gallivan, Nemeskal, Shea, & Vliet, 1995). Although such analysis can identify specific errors that occur in specific situations, there is still lack of theory, consistent measures, and empirical research on this important issue. Errors are not documented consistently, even within one organization (Savitz, Jones, & Bernard, 2005). This can lead to inaccurate information about where problems lie in organization (Antonow, Smith, and Sliver, 2000; James, 2005). Scholars have decreased emphasis on individual incompetence and begun to focus more on systems approaches for increasing patient safety (Reason, 2000, 2001 ; Schyve, 2005). However, Hoff, Jameson, Hannan, and Fink (2004) found few published empirical studies linking systems approaches to improved outcomes. Thinking of patient safety in terms of typical quality indicators has also not resulted in consistent measures across instruments or provider groups. In fact, Savitz, Jones, and Bernard (2005) concluded that there is currently no unified direction (p.383) for development of patient safety indicators. Few, if any, empirical studies have specifically asked front-line health care providers what they see as key contributors to preventable adverse medical events. …" @default.
• W70261837 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W70261837 creator A5013308253 @default.
• W70261837 creator A5019358226 @default.
• W70261837 creator A5074191347 @default.
• W70261837 date "2006-10-01" @default.
• W70261837 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W70261837 title "Minimizing Medical Errors: A Qualitative Analysis of Health Care Providers' Views on Improving Patient Safety" @default.
• W70261837 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W70261837 type Work @default.
• W70261837 sameAs 70261837 @default.
• W70261837 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W70261837 countsByYear W702618372016 @default.
• W70261837 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W70261837 hasAuthorship W70261837A5013308253 @default.
• W70261837 hasAuthorship W70261837A5019358226 @default.
• W70261837 hasAuthorship W70261837A5074191347 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C2776654903 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C2777512617 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W70261837 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C144024400 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C15744967 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C159110408 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C160735492 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C162324750 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C169760540 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C190248442 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C26760741 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C2776654903 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C2777512617 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C2779328685 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C36289849 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C38652104 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C41008148 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C50522688 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C512399662 @default.
• W70261837 hasConceptScore W70261837C71924100 @default.
• W70261837 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W70261837 hasLocation W702618371 @default.
• W70261837 hasOpenAccess W70261837 @default.
• W70261837 hasPrimaryLocation W702618371 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W1495449367 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W1852730534 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W1978719487 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W1991292043 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2014888802 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2024506388 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2100762536 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2124556739 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2132078261 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2152968351 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2155445713 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2319124831 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2343126695 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2780289983 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2788309878 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2921571783 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2995273579 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W3048169199 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W3157939590 @default.
• W70261837 hasRelatedWork W2501219873 @default.
• W70261837 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W70261837 isParatext "false" @default.
• W70261837 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W70261837 magId "70261837" @default.
• W70261837 workType "article" @default.