Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W7105194> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W7105194 endingPage "90" @default.
- W7105194 startingPage "1783" @default.
- W7105194 abstract "To compare short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and motion-automated perimetry, each of which assesses different aspects of visual function, in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and ocular hypertension.One hundred thirty-six eyes from 136 subjects were evaluated with all three tests as well as with standard automated perimetry. Fields were not used in the classification of study groups to prevent bias, because the major purpose of the study was to evaluate each field type relative to the others. Seventy-one of the 136 eyes had glaucomatous optic neuropathy, 37 had ocular hypertension, and 28 served as age-matched normal control eyes. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy was defined by assessment of stereophotographs. Criteria were asymmetrical cupping, the presence of rim thinning, notching, excavation, or nerve fiber layer defect. Ocular hypertensive eyes had intraocular pressure of 23 mm Hg or more on at least two occasions and normal-appearing optic disc stereophotographs. Criteria for abnormality on each visual field test were selected to approximate a specificity of 90% in the normal eyes. Thresholds for each of the four tests were compared, to determine the percentage that were abnormal within each patient group and to assess the agreement among test results for abnormality, location, and extent of visual field deficit.Each test identified a subset of the eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy as abnormal: 46% with standard perimetry, 61% with short-wavelength automated perimetry, 70% with frequency-doubling perimetry, and 52% with motion-automated perimetry. In the ocular hypertensive eyes, standard perimetry was abnormal in 5%, short wavelength in 22%, frequency doubling in 46%, and motion in 30%. Fifty-four percent (38/71) of eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy were normal on standard fields. However, 90% were identified by at least one of the specific visual function tests. Combining tests improved sensitivity with slight reductions in specificity. The agreement in at least one quadrant, when a defect was present with more than one test, was very high at 92% to 97%. More extensive deficits were shown by frequency-doubling perimetry followed by short-wavelength automated perimetry, then motion-automated perimetry, and last, standard perimetry. However, there were significant individual differences in which test of any given pairing was more extensively affected. Only 30% (11/37) of the ocular hypertensive eyes showed no deficits at all compared with 71% (20/28) of the control eyes (P < 0.001).For detection of functional loss standard visual field testing is not optimum; a combination of two or more tests may improve detection of functional loss in these eyes; in an individual, the same retinal location is damaged, regardless of visual function under test; glaucomatous optic neuropathy identified on stereophotographs may precede currently measurable function loss in some eyes; conversely, function loss with specific tests may precede detection of abnormality by stereophotograph review; and short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling perimetry, and motion-automated perimetry continue to show promise as early indicators of function loss in glaucoma." @default.
- W7105194 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W7105194 creator A5000955140 @default.
- W7105194 creator A5011477510 @default.
- W7105194 creator A5015625911 @default.
- W7105194 creator A5043994887 @default.
- W7105194 creator A5072459018 @default.
- W7105194 date "2000-06-01" @default.
- W7105194 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W7105194 title "Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma." @default.
- W7105194 cites W123292583 @default.
- W7105194 cites W134869358 @default.
- W7105194 cites W139289763 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1561165420 @default.
- W7105194 cites W166344711 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1760754892 @default.
- W7105194 cites W182034084 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1938186605 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1963840535 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1966059711 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1970765245 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1975048390 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1975693030 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1978175665 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1978731921 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1978924174 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1991740357 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1996822428 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1997370969 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2007468846 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2010299614 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2011037699 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2017801824 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2017992423 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2018846098 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2023013696 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2026510743 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2028188926 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2034877924 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2035108488 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2036711612 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2042629375 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2043730086 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2044558395 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2051859669 @default.
- W7105194 cites W20568726 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2060696862 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2063566743 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2075883675 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2078416247 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2085891998 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2092685394 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2093137548 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2102006912 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2103088346 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2113032894 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2115927311 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2116844962 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2133722549 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2147350046 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2163875444 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2251150204 @default.
- W7105194 cites W2317196372 @default.
- W7105194 cites W3481184 @default.
- W7105194 cites W1256889034 @default.
- W7105194 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10845599" @default.
- W7105194 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W7105194 type Work @default.
- W7105194 sameAs 7105194 @default.
- W7105194 citedByCount "90" @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942012 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942013 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942014 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942015 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942016 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942017 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942018 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942019 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942021 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942022 @default.
- W7105194 countsByYear W71051942023 @default.
- W7105194 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W7105194 hasAuthorship W7105194A5000955140 @default.
- W7105194 hasAuthorship W7105194A5011477510 @default.
- W7105194 hasAuthorship W7105194A5015625911 @default.
- W7105194 hasAuthorship W7105194A5043994887 @default.
- W7105194 hasAuthorship W7105194A5072459018 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C2776058522 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C2776148792 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C2776521421 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C2778233873 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C2778527774 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C2779735895 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C2780592520 @default.
- W7105194 hasConcept C2780837183 @default.