FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W71094445> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W71094445 endingPage "41" @default.
• W71094445 startingPage "41" @default.
• W71094445 abstract "This research examines financial ratios that distinguish between bankrupt and non-bankrupt companies and make use of those distinguishing ratios to build a one-year prior to bankruptcy prediction model. This research also calculates how many times the type I error is more costly compared to the type II error. The costs of type I and type II errors (cost of misclassification errors) in conjunction to the calculation of prior probabilities of bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy are used in the calculation of the ZETAc optimal cut-off score. The bankruptcy prediction result using ZETAc optimal cut-off score is compared to the bankruptcy prediction result using a cut-off score which does not consider neither cost of classification errors nor prior probabilities as stated by Hair et al. (1998), and for later purposes will be referred to Hair et al. optimum cutting score. Comparison between the prediction results of both cut-off scores is purported to determine the better cut-off score between the two, so that the prediction result is more conservative and minimizes expected costs, which may occur from classification errors. This is the first research in Indonesia that incorporates type I and II errors and prior probabilities of bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy in the computation of the cut-off score used in performing bankruptcy prediction. Earlier researches gave the same weight between type I and II errors and prior probabilities of bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy, while this research gives a greater weigh on type I error than that on type II error and prior probability of non-bankruptcy than that on prior probability of bankruptcy.This research has successfully attained the following results: (1) type I error is in fact 59,83 times more costly compared to type II error, (2) 22 ratios distinguish between bankrupt and non-bankrupt groups, (3) 2 financial ratios proved to be effective in predicting bankruptcy, (4) prediction using ZETAc optimal cut-off score predicts more companies filing for bankruptcy within one year compared to prediction using Hair et al. optimum cutting score, (5) Although prediction using Hair et al. optimum cutting score is more accurate, prediction using ZETAc optimal cut-off score proved to be able to minimize cost incurred from classification errors." @default.
• W71094445 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W71094445 creator A5005478516 @default.
• W71094445 date "2005-06-05" @default.
• W71094445 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W71094445 title "BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION MODEL WITH ZETAc OPTIMAL CUT-OFF SCORE TO CORRECT TYPE I ERRORS" @default.
• W71094445 doi "https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5563" @default.
• W71094445 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W71094445 type Work @default.
• W71094445 sameAs 71094445 @default.
• W71094445 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W71094445 countsByYear W710944452013 @default.
• W71094445 countsByYear W710944452020 @default.
• W71094445 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W71094445 hasAuthorship W71094445A5005478516 @default.
• W71094445 hasBestOaLocation W710944451 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C2777388754 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C40696583 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W71094445 hasConcept C504631918 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C10138342 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C105795698 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C149782125 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C162118730 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C162324750 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C2777388754 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C33923547 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C40696583 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C41008148 @default.
• W71094445 hasConceptScore W71094445C504631918 @default.
• W71094445 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W71094445 hasLocation W710944451 @default.
• W71094445 hasOpenAccess W71094445 @default.
• W71094445 hasPrimaryLocation W710944451 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W1431562587 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W1980029578 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W1988695315 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W2090210491 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W2092043312 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W3122393034 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W3139417948 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W3197571623 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W4316928393 @default.
• W71094445 hasRelatedWork W2540786260 @default.
• W71094445 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W71094445 isParatext "false" @default.
• W71094445 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W71094445 magId "71094445" @default.
• W71094445 workType "article" @default.