FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W71408460> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W71408460 endingPage "219" @default.
• W71408460 startingPage "213" @default.
• W71408460 abstract "This paper investigates an approach to begin the study of fractals in architectural design. Vector-based fractals are studied to determine if the modification of vector direction in either the generator or the initiator will develop alternate fractal forms. The Koch Snowflake is used as the demonstrating fractal. Introduction A fractal is an object or quantity that displays self-similarity on all scales. The object need not exhibit exactly the same structure at all scales, but the same “type” of structures must appear on all scales [7]. Fractals were first discussed by Mandelbrot in the 1970s [4], but the idea was identified as early as 1925. Fractals have been investigated for their visual qualities as art, their relationship to explain natural processes, music, medicine, and in mathematics [5]. Javier Barrallo classified fractals [2] into six main groups depending on their type: 1. Fractals derived from standard geometry by using iterative transformations on an initial common figure. 2. IFS (Iterated Function Systems), this is a type of fractal introduced by Michael Barnsley. 3. Strange attractors. 4. Plasma fractals. Created with techniques like fractional Brownian motion. 5. L-Systems, also called Lindenmayer systems, were not invented to create fractals but to model cellular growth and interactions. 6. Fractals created by the iteration of complex polynomials. From the mathematical point of view, we can classify fractals into three major categories. The first, IFS, iterated function system, like Koch Snowflake, Cantor set, Barnsley's Fern and the Dragon Curve shown in Figure 4. This method can generate a fractal from any set of vectors or any defined curve. The second is the complex number fractals. They can be two-dimensional, three-dimensional, or multipledimensional. They represent a single case of the IFS that is using the complex numbers or the hyper complex numbers in a Cartesian plane to plot the fractals. The Mandelbrot set and Julia set are examples of these. The third is orbit fractals. They are generated by plotting an orbit in two or three-dimensional space. Examples include the Bifurcation orbit, Lorenz Attractors, Rossler Attractors, Henon Attractors, Pickover Attractors, Gingerbreadman, and Martin Attractors. These are associated with chaos theory. By examining these fractals, we were also able to classify them into two major categories depending on the method they could be created, or the mathematical method used to calculate them. From the drawing method point of view, the first method is a line or vector fractal. These are generated from the recursive replacement of vectors, like the Dragon Curve in Figure 1a. The second are fractals that are generated as a group of points in the complex plane, such as the Mandelbrot set and the Julia set, as in Figure 1b. Some fractals that exhibit a vector quality can also be generated by point plotting methods. Figure 1. Fractal types In this research, we are interested in vector-based fractals and the use of the replacement concept and the iterated function system as a way to generate them. These fractals have directional and geometrical properties that make them possibly suitable for applications in architecture. Vector-based fractals can be described in terms of vertices and the lines connecting them. This has the potential to be used directly as architectural elements or to simply use the vertices to define the locations of such elements. Chris Yessios with Peter Eisenman [8] were among the first to write about utilizing fractals and fractal geometry in architecture. Yessios described a way computers can be introduced to architectural design as an explorer and generator of architectural forms. He used the fractal geometry, arabesque ornamentation and DNA/RNA biological processes as fractal generators. A fractal program was developed that enabled him to use several generators on the same base and to go many steps forward in the iteration process, as well as, backward. The project that was used in this investigation was a studio project to design a building for a competition given a specific architectural program. More recently, S. Durmisevic and O. Ciftcioglu [3] discussed another approach on how fractals can be used in architectural design. They proposed to use a fractal tree form as an indicator of a road infrastructure and another fractal to determine the type of architectural forms to place along this transportation spine. Fractal geometry was used for architectural forms and urban planning. No other similar studies could be found where fractals were used as architectural form generators to suggest three-dimensional forms. The results from these two suggest that the explicit self-similarity and the repetition of the same shape may distract from developing interesting architectural forms, so both developed means to modify the replication. For this particular study we intend to investigate only the directional property found in generating vector-based fractals. b. Mandelbrot set a. Dragon fractal a. Dragon curve b. Mandelbrot set Creating a fractal A vector-base fractal, Figure 2, is composed of two parts: the initiator and the generator. For example, the Koch Snowflake starts with an equilateral triangle as the initiator. The generator is a line that is divided into three equal segments. The middle segment forms an equilateral triangle. By replacing every line of the initiator with the full generator, we get the first iteration of the snowflake. By iterating this operation again and again, replacing every line of the new initiator with the full generator, we end with a figure that approximates a snowflake. The iteration process can continue to infinity to generate a real Koch Snowflake fractal, but as we are interested in the evolving form, we only iterate the function for some finite number of times. Figure 3a displays the Koch Snowflake for each of three iterations. Normally, an alternative version can be created if the generator is changed, inverted. It then becomes the Koch Antisnowflake, Figure 3b. Figure 2. Generator and initiator Figure 3. The Koch Snowflake and the Antisnowflake Shape of generators and initiators There is a group of fractals, including Mandelbrot set variations that have been formally identified in his book “The Fractal Geometry of Nature” [4] as depending on the concept of replacement. Some of the IFS fractals are: Cantor Set, Barnsley's Fern, Koch Antisnowflake, Koch Snowflake, Box Fractal, Cantor Square Fractal, Cesaro Fractal, Dragon Curve, Gosper Island Fractal, H-Fractal, Sierpinski Curve, Minkowski Sausage. Some of these are displayed in Figure 4. Initiator Generator" @default.
• W71408460 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W71408460 creator A5021581679 @default.
• W71408460 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W71408460 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W71408460 title "Exploring the Effect of Direction on Vector-Based Fractals" @default.
• W71408460 cites W2049556585 @default.
• W71408460 cites W2078206416 @default.
• W71408460 cites W2289403981 @default.
• W71408460 cites W2785080400 @default.
• W71408460 cites W627486474 @default.
• W71408460 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W71408460 type Work @default.
• W71408460 sameAs 71408460 @default.
• W71408460 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W71408460 countsByYear W714084602016 @default.
• W71408460 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W71408460 hasAuthorship W71408460A5021581679 @default.
• W71408460 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W71408460 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W71408460 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W71408460 hasConcept C40636538 @default.
• W71408460 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W71408460 hasConceptScore W71408460C134306372 @default.
• W71408460 hasConceptScore W71408460C154945302 @default.
• W71408460 hasConceptScore W71408460C33923547 @default.
• W71408460 hasConceptScore W71408460C40636538 @default.
• W71408460 hasConceptScore W71408460C41008148 @default.
• W71408460 hasLocation W714084601 @default.
• W71408460 hasOpenAccess W71408460 @default.
• W71408460 hasPrimaryLocation W714084601 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W1904989424 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W193394298 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W1954405510 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W1993821844 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2049500169 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2061629685 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2063719245 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2071262049 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2099081901 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2160764382 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2354714558 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W235478437 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2366122886 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2607093876 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2741151468 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2898687288 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W2901536701 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W29860988 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W3099520482 @default.
• W71408460 hasRelatedWork W3146363959 @default.
• W71408460 isParatext "false" @default.
• W71408460 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W71408460 magId "71408460" @default.
• W71408460 workType "article" @default.