FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W7338314> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W7338314 endingPage "140" @default.
• W7338314 startingPage "129" @default.
• W7338314 abstract "The climate along the Russian-Ukrainian border became much cooler of late. There are two most popular explanations of this fact offered by mass consciousness depending on which side of the border the explaining person is situated. On one side, there is a lot of talk about the Big Brother syndrome that Russian politicians have not yet abandoned; the very term near abroad used in Russia to describe the former Soviet republics is seen as the most convincing of proofs of neoimperialist thinking in which Russian politicians indulge themselves and of their unwillingness to accept complete independence of the former Soviet republics. On the other side of the border much is said, with equally good reason, that many of the Ukrainian nationalists take the adjective anti-Russian for a synonym of nationally specific, while the common past sometimes acquires very odd interpretations. Irrespective of what can be said about this, the relations between the two countries are still painful, they leave nobody unmoved. The reasons are numerous: territorial neighborhood, the feeling of historical and cultural kinship and a shared past; the nations both sides of the border are coping with similar problems; biased information fed by the official Ukrainian and Russian media as well as the yet unsettled problems of coexistence (gas, the Black Sea Fleet and our common history as presented in the textbooks). Few are aware of the fact that the problem of bilateral relations goes far beyond the frames of interaction between these two countries. It affects the fates of many other nations and states, primarily, on the European continent, and is increasingly gaining a global dimension. Present-day interaction between Russia and Ukraine places new geopolitical accents, affecting the two countries' strategic positions in the world (not so much in the military as in many other spheres). The problems accumulated in their relationships are too many to be resolved anytime soon. The situation of the Russian population in Ukraine discussed in this article is one of the most painful issues. The article is based on sociological studies carried out by students and the professorate of the Black Sea branch of Moscow State University in Sevastopol. ... The ethnonational situation in Ukraine is much more complicated than that pictured by the official data of the 2002 population census. So far the fact that a ... O. Volkogonova, D. Sc. (Philos.), Professor, head of the chair of philosophy of the Natural Sciences departments, Moscow State University. The article appeared in Russian in Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskiye nauki, No. 1, 2007. ... стр. 129 ... large share of ethnic Ukrainians still see the Russian language rather than the Ukrainian as their native tongue is one of the most typical features of the country's ethnocultural situation. While in the Lugansk and Donetsk regions over 60% describes Russian as the native tongue and in the Kharkov, Zaporozhye and Odessa regions the share is over 50%, in the Crimea the share of Russian speakers is 85%. The Soviet Russification policy alone cannot be held responsible for this; we should also bear in mind the industrialization and urbanization processes1 and the frequency and deep-cutting nature of interethnic communications; there is a large number of mixed marriages between Ukrainians and Russians because they share a common culture, religion, and life style. ... The first all-Ukraine population census posited many questions after its verified figures were published in January 2003. There were 48.457 million people living in the republic (51.7 million according to the 1989 population census), Ukrainians were in the majority (37.54 million, or 77.8% of the total population). The remaining 22% was made up of national minorities (8334.1 thousand of them being Russians). The figures testified that while the numerical strength of the Ukraine's population had decreased catastrophically (over 3 million since 1989), the share of ethnic Ukrainians increased by 5.1% (72.7% of the total population in 1989 - 77.8% in 2001). The number of Russians dropped dramatically (by 26.6%) in twelve years. Their share in the republic's total population was 17.3% as against 32.1% in 1989. ... This invited all sorts of explanations that can be summed up as three factors: first, the census returns were falsified (either by doctoring the figures or using wrong methods of gathering of information); second, migration allegedly caused the drop in the numerical strength of Russians in Ukraine (in reality, there was no massive exodus of Russians from Ukraine; a much more massive outflow of Russian native speakers from the Baltic and Central Asian countries did not cause a similar decrease); third, certain researchers spoke about changed self-identification. This sounds convincing. What is all this about? ... The respondents had to select only one nationality." @default.
• W7338314 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W7338314 creator A5044433023 @default.
• W7338314 date "2007-12-31" @default.
• W7338314 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W7338314 title "The Russian Diaspora in the Crimea: Ethnopolitical Aspect" @default.
• W7338314 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W7338314 type Work @default.
• W7338314 sameAs 7338314 @default.
• W7338314 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W7338314 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W7338314 hasAuthorship W7338314A5044433023 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C21931767 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C2778611045 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C36914074 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W7338314 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C111919701 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C138885662 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C138921699 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C144024400 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C17744445 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C199539241 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C21931767 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C2778611045 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C36914074 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C41008148 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C41895202 @default.
• W7338314 hasConceptScore W7338314C95457728 @default.
• W7338314 hasLocation W73383141 @default.
• W7338314 hasOpenAccess W7338314 @default.
• W7338314 hasPrimaryLocation W73383141 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W1507496632 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W1547570428 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W1998005103 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W203237060 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2054652502 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2073305593 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2103112162 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2127439385 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2189235007 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2207082616 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2305947561 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2314609993 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2326988442 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2329453664 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2334325489 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W235594842 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W241481307 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2978698698 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W335140237 @default.
• W7338314 hasRelatedWork W2529289494 @default.
• W7338314 isParatext "false" @default.
• W7338314 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W7338314 magId "7338314" @default.
• W7338314 workType "article" @default.