Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W73973345> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W73973345 startingPage "460" @default.
- W73973345 abstract "The strong position taken by Campbell and Lee (1988) regarding the limited usefulness of self-appraisals as an evaluation tool (Folger and Lewis, 1995) has elicited doubts about the use of self-ratings in the performance appraisal process. The leniency effect associated with self-ratings (Farh and Dobbins, 1989; Harris and Schaubroeck, 1988) raises concern about the legitimacy of using self-ratings, and sets the stage for possible disagreement between superiors and subordinates. However, studies of performance appraisal systems consistently indicate the importance of ratee involvement in the appraisal process (Landy et al., 1978; Dipboye and de Pontbriand, 1981; Greenberg, 1986; Folger and Konovsky, 1989; Cawley et al., 1998), providing indirect support for the use of self-appraisals. Furthermore, the traditional top-down appraisal system is clearly inconsistent with the trends toward employee involvement, suggesting that a performance appraisal interview based on an employee's self-rating is more appropriate than a discussion based only on the performance evaluation conducted by a manager (Meyer, 1991; Baruch, 1996). Early work by Bassett and Meyer (1968) reported that the subordinates who self-rated were generally positive about the self-appraisal approach and were more likely to see their manager's criticism of their performance as warranted when compared to those subordinates who were not given an opportunity to self-rate. More recently, Roberson et al. (1993) conducted a field experiment to investigate the impact of a both-rate self-appraisal (superior and subordinate independently completed ratings) where subordinates were randomly assigned to a or no self-rate condition. Roberson et al. (1993) hypothesized that individuals assigned to the self-appraisal condition would report greater satisfaction with the appraisal interview, greater understanding of their manager's expectations and perceive the procedure to be fairer than those individuals who did not self-evaluate. These hypotheses were not supported. However, an unexpected finding emerged. Roberson et al. (1993) found that individuals in the no self-rate group who performed an informal self-rating were more satisfied with the appraisal, and felt their ratings were fairer than individuals who did not self-rate. The results of the Roberson et al. (1993) study are not consistent with the oft-cited work of Bassett and Meyer (1968). There is a significant difference in the research design of the two studies. In the Bassett and Meyer study, individuals who self-evaluated did not receive a performance evaluation from their superiors; performance appraisal discussions were based solely on the subordinate's self-evaluation. In the Roberson et al. (1993) study, appraisal discussions were centered on the self-appraisals and the formal evaluation of their superiors. As noted by Campbell and Lee (1988), this situation may create the possibility for conflict. Roberson et al. (1993) surmise that formal self-ratings tend to raise employee expectations, while informal self-ratings may not have the same effect. In addition, formal self-ratings may be instituted in an environment where little employee participation has been allowed, while informal self-ratings are more likely to occur when individuals feel comfortable providing input. Given the concerns related to leniency effects and increased expectations of self-ratings, along with the mixed findings regarding individuals' reactions to self-appraisals, the question is raised as to under what conditions might self-ratings be useful. Our study differs from previous investigations of self-ratings in that superiors in the organization we studied were given full control over whether or not subordinates performed a self-rating of their performance. All superiors had received training related to the performance appraisal process. Superiors were required to conduct an appraisal interview following their formal review and rating of subordinates' performance. …" @default.
- W73973345 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W73973345 creator A5020348891 @default.
- W73973345 creator A5083448634 @default.
- W73973345 creator A5088623125 @default.
- W73973345 date "2004-12-22" @default.
- W73973345 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W73973345 title "Managerial Discretion in the Use Of Self-Ratings in an Appraisal System: The Antecedents And Consequences" @default.
- W73973345 cites W1641059465 @default.
- W73973345 cites W1753472752 @default.
- W73973345 cites W1963721879 @default.
- W73973345 cites W1964055070 @default.
- W73973345 cites W1978510220 @default.
- W73973345 cites W1984492382 @default.
- W73973345 cites W1999935322 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2016504565 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2020269323 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2023375733 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2027103146 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2031407232 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2036059544 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2046268850 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2047169193 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2063410204 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2068275620 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2070555788 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2074629135 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2102718961 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2107283888 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2107535105 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2111562544 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2131166813 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2146415340 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2149746305 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2150658292 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2150846487 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2152983331 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2158206059 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2161537927 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2161928604 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2162080380 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2170629381 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2413196330 @default.
- W73973345 cites W73657983 @default.
- W73973345 cites W2997780448 @default.
- W73973345 cites W3021629277 @default.
- W73973345 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W73973345 type Work @default.
- W73973345 sameAs 73973345 @default.
- W73973345 citedByCount "6" @default.
- W73973345 countsByYear W739733452012 @default.
- W73973345 countsByYear W739733452013 @default.
- W73973345 countsByYear W739733452017 @default.
- W73973345 countsByYear W739733452019 @default.
- W73973345 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W73973345 hasAuthorship W73973345A5020348891 @default.
- W73973345 hasAuthorship W73973345A5083448634 @default.
- W73973345 hasAuthorship W73973345A5088623125 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C2777873905 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C4994750 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W73973345 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C15744967 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C162324750 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C17744445 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C187736073 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C199539241 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C2777873905 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C4994750 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C75630572 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C77805123 @default.
- W73973345 hasConceptScore W73973345C7991579 @default.
- W73973345 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W73973345 hasLocation W739733451 @default.
- W73973345 hasOpenAccess W73973345 @default.
- W73973345 hasPrimaryLocation W739733451 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W105039284 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2012229077 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2027444340 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2030135236 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2030441548 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2038718142 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2041573082 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2043531667 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2065302479 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2074629135 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2077965329 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2078763844 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2082242361 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2085052170 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2087695130 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2094151552 @default.
- W73973345 hasRelatedWork W2095447877 @default.