FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W7423670> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W7423670 abstract "Objectives This report describes the strengths and weaknesses of checklists that have been used to evaluate best practices for conducting and reporting on economic evaluations in health care. We defined checklists as any original listing of specific items that the authors recommended be addressed in the conduct or reporting of an economic evaluation. We focused on how checklists define: (1) the criteria for judging that an economic evaluation is of sufficiently high quality to be useful; (2) the importance of different aspects of the evaluation; and (3) the extent to which high quality with respect to one aspect of an evaluation can compensate for lower quality with respect to another aspect of the evaluation. Methods A systematic approach was taken to search the literature through January 2012 for articles relevant to economic evaluations, outcomes, and guidelines for the decisionmaker. The following electronic databases were searched using similar search strategies: MEDLINE, EconLit, CINAHL, Embase, and ISI Web of Science. References of relevant reviews were searched for applicable articles. Experts were queried to ensure that all pertinent articles were included. Results Ten peer-reviewed journal articles reported on an original checklist for assessing an economic evaluation. The first was published in 1992, and the last was published in 2011. The number of items in the checklists ranged from 11 to 57. One item, perspective, was a criterion in all 10 of the checklists. Eleven other criteria were included in seven to nine of the checklists: description of the target population, choice of alternatives, study question, study design, measurement, valuation, outcome identification, outcome measurement, adjustment for time variation, sensitivity and uncertainties, presentation of results, generalizability, and incremental analysis. Four of the checklists had evidence of excellent test-retest reliability, but none of the checklists had consistent evidence of excellent inter-rater reliability in two or more studies. Only three of the checklists had evidence of excellent criterion validity, based on comparisons between checklists or comparisons with ratings of experts in health economics. Conclusion Several well-developed checklists exist for investigators, reviewers, and journal editors to use in efforts to ensure that economic evaluations and eventual systematic reviews of economic evaluations will be more informative and transparent. The choice of an appropriate checklist should be made with the understanding that quality assessment tools will continue to evolve over time and must improve in reliability and validity for all decisionmakers." @default.
• W7423670 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W7423670 creator A5024008116 @default.
• W7423670 creator A5035107070 @default.
• W7423670 creator A5048876130 @default.
• W7423670 creator A5056638016 @default.
• W7423670 creator A5062226918 @default.
• W7423670 creator A5063115936 @default.
• W7423670 creator A5087252514 @default.
• W7423670 date "2012-12-12" @default.
• W7423670 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W7423670 title "Best Practices for Conducting Economic Evaluations in Health Care: A Systematic Review of Quality Assessment Tools" @default.
• W7423670 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23230577" @default.
• W7423670 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W7423670 type Work @default.
• W7423670 sameAs 7423670 @default.
• W7423670 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W7423670 countsByYear W74236702014 @default.
• W7423670 countsByYear W74236702015 @default.
• W7423670 countsByYear W74236702017 @default.
• W7423670 countsByYear W74236702019 @default.
• W7423670 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W7423670 hasAuthorship W7423670A5024008116 @default.
• W7423670 hasAuthorship W7423670A5035107070 @default.
• W7423670 hasAuthorship W7423670A5048876130 @default.
• W7423670 hasAuthorship W7423670A5056638016 @default.
• W7423670 hasAuthorship W7423670A5062226918 @default.
• W7423670 hasAuthorship W7423670A5063115936 @default.
• W7423670 hasAuthorship W7423670A5087252514 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C2778980733 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C63882131 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W7423670 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C111472728 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C138885662 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C142724271 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C15744967 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C160735492 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C17744445 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C180747234 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C189708586 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C199539241 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C2776125615 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C2778980733 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C2779356329 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C2779473830 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C2779530757 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C2781145037 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C2908647359 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C509550671 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C512399662 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C63882131 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C71924100 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C77805123 @default.
• W7423670 hasConceptScore W7423670C99454951 @default.
• W7423670 hasOpenAccess W7423670 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W1593173821 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W1989654054 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W1999775390 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2026500950 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2035225982 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2060513754 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2067316800 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2075540770 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2104471097 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2112383195 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2119790985 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2131779687 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2140326213 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2143025931 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2147086588 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2414608479 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2582334874 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W2991792334 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W3127866816 @default.
• W7423670 hasRelatedWork W3151002452 @default.
• W7423670 isParatext "false" @default.
• W7423670 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W7423670 magId "7423670" @default.
• W7423670 workType "article" @default.