FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W746404665> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W746404665 startingPage "423" @default.
• W746404665 abstract "AbstractThis study provides a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the coverage of Pakistani press regarding US policy towards South Asia in the context of war on terror from January 2011 to December 2012. All unsigned editorials appeared in The News and Dawn examined by applying content analysis method containing themes related to US policy towards Pakistan such as: Drone attacks and USAID to Pakistan; US policy towards Afghanistan and US policy towards India. The study maintains that both Dawn & The News were critical to US policy towards Pakistan regarding Drone Attacks but the tone of The News was intense in nature. Moreover, the Dawn supported US policy to provide USAID to Pakistan, while The News was critical to it. On US policy towards India, The News supported the US policy to maintain friendly relations with India despite of Kashmir issue. On US policy towards Afghanistan, The News framed a negative picture of US while Dawn adopted a balance stance. The pattern of coverage supports the argument that the press and foreign policy relationship is issue-specific and it also has linked with media organization's policy. This study also asserts that on foreign policy issues press framing is not necessarily influenced by country's defined foreign policy objectives.Key Words: Drone attacks, Framing, Media, USAID to Pakistan.US policy towards South Asia, War on TerrorIntroductionThe media farming of foreign policy issues always have great importance for political scientists and communication scholars because media has power to shape public opinion in the favor of or opposition to government policy line. Kellner (1995) maintains that media frame [foreign policy] issues within the context of ideology, politics and culture in such a way that cultivate representational picture in the audience mind. Galtung and Ruge (1970:260) acknowledged media as a powerful tool of image former. The media images are based upon the that may be positive, neutral or negative in their tones. According to Berenger (2004), frames make messages memorable and understandable (cited in King & Lester, 2005:626). Neuman et al. (1992:60) labeled as conceptual tools' used to convey, interpret, and evaluate information. Norris (1995) argues news as cognitive schemata, and journalists usually work with news to simplify, prioritize and structure the narrative flow of events. Therefore, media has power to shape the mind set of people and lias ability to frame the issue/event in the perspective of newspaper organization. The basic objective of this study is to investigate how US foreign policy towards Pakistan, Afghanistan and India was framed in the editorials of the leading English newspapers of Pakistan; the Dawn and The News. This study also explores how the Dawn and The News converged or diverged in their editorial framing of US policy and to what extent coverage trends reflects newspaper organization policy/ideology. Moreover, this study examines the issue-specific nature of foreign policy coverage of Pakistani press.The period of study has significant importance with reference to US policy towards South Asian region because of the following reasons. (1) Assassination of Osama bin Laden in a US military operation on 2nd May 201 teamed out in Pakistan that created strong anti-American sentiments among the people of Pakistan who considered this military operation as a breach of their country's sovereignty. (2) US Drone attacks in northwest region of the Pakistan. (3) US pressure to launch a military operation in North Waziristan against terrorists' networks. (4) Public and political pressure on Pakistan government to stop NATO supplies through Pakistan and (5) USAID to Pakistan and its link with Pakistan's support in the war on terror. In addition, the importance of US policy towards Afghanistan lias increased after the President Barack Obama statement regarding the withdrawal of NATO troops from Afghanistan in 2014. …" @default.
• W746404665 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W746404665 creator A5039123877 @default.
• W746404665 creator A5066287598 @default.
• W746404665 date "2014-07-01" @default.
• W746404665 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W746404665 title "US Foreign Policy towards South Asia (2011-2012): Framing of Pakistani Press" @default.
• W746404665 cites W1560225671 @default.
• W746404665 cites W1971717444 @default.
• W746404665 cites W2061915390 @default.
• W746404665 cites W2077682195 @default.
• W746404665 cites W2149355000 @default.
• W746404665 cites W2171056062 @default.
• W746404665 cites W2235889647 @default.
• W746404665 cites W2489162830 @default.
• W746404665 cites W2800951387 @default.
• W746404665 cites W41248446 @default.
• W746404665 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W746404665 type Work @default.
• W746404665 sameAs 746404665 @default.
• W746404665 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W746404665 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W746404665 hasAuthorship W746404665A5039123877 @default.
• W746404665 hasAuthorship W746404665A5066287598 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C169087156 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C188888794 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C2780668109 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C529147693 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C93377909 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W746404665 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C138921699 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C144024400 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C166957645 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C169087156 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C17744445 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C188888794 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C199539241 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C2780668109 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C29595303 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C529147693 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C93377909 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C94625758 @default.
• W746404665 hasConceptScore W746404665C95457728 @default.
• W746404665 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W746404665 hasLocation W7464046651 @default.
• W746404665 hasOpenAccess W746404665 @default.
• W746404665 hasPrimaryLocation W7464046651 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W107228587 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W1952113646 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2020394410 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2079625000 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2112616496 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2151611600 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2259125008 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2303494816 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2308273288 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2495284447 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2757223593 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2810307340 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2971542999 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W3041458545 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W3131976988 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W318741754 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W3207221590 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2181501236 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2597578058 @default.
• W746404665 hasRelatedWork W2995169624 @default.
• W746404665 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W746404665 isParatext "false" @default.
• W746404665 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W746404665 magId "746404665" @default.
• W746404665 workType "article" @default.