Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W752669732> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W752669732 endingPage "381" @default.
- W752669732 startingPage "376" @default.
- W752669732 abstract "While applying the systems engineering (SE) in systems development, a series of technical reviews play a critical role and is intended to monitor the status of the progress and outcomes of the project for which appropriate technical plans prepared earlier should be executed. It is noted however that during the technical review executed as planned, a lot of problems usually come out. Included are the ambiguity in the reports of the progress status and outcomes, discrepancies among the opinions from different participants, and the delay in carrying out the tasks. To solve those problems in an early stage, informal reviews are usually adopted before the formal technical reviews are held. A type of the informal reviews is the peer review. This paper is concerned with the peer review process model to make the later technical reviews more effective. Specifically, we first review the necessity and meaning of the peer reviews. We then study a model for the peer review process. To model the process, the methods of an IDEF modeling and schema definition have been applied using a computer-aided SE tool, Cradle(R), in the environment of the national research and development project. As a result, the implemented process model can show hew the peer review process is designed and managed to be utilized in the technical review. The documents related with the peer review process can also be generated automatically from the developed model Database. Finally, a general misunderstanding about the peer review and its improvement plan have also been mentioned." @default.
- W752669732 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W752669732 creator A5074059441 @default.
- W752669732 creator A5083616687 @default.
- W752669732 creator A5089246061 @default.
- W752669732 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W752669732 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W752669732 title "On the Peer-Review Process Model for an Effective Technical Review" @default.
- W752669732 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W752669732 type Work @default.
- W752669732 sameAs 752669732 @default.
- W752669732 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W752669732 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W752669732 hasAuthorship W752669732A5074059441 @default.
- W752669732 hasAuthorship W752669732A5083616687 @default.
- W752669732 hasAuthorship W752669732A5089246061 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C110754006 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C2776505523 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C2780522230 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C52146309 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W752669732 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C110754006 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C111919701 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C127413603 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C138368954 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C166957645 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C17744445 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C195094911 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C199360897 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C199539241 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C23123220 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C2776505523 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C2780522230 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C41008148 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C52146309 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C539667460 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C95457728 @default.
- W752669732 hasConceptScore W752669732C98045186 @default.
- W752669732 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W752669732 hasLocation W7526697321 @default.
- W752669732 hasOpenAccess W752669732 @default.
- W752669732 hasPrimaryLocation W7526697321 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W1511911542 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W1521091246 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W1546884423 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W1881144605 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W1991373531 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W1998248566 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2089210111 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2094292482 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2096971142 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2109866086 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2153523756 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2198102568 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2250086818 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2503026924 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2520218155 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W2611979808 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W3044972860 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W3086641389 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W36034720 @default.
- W752669732 hasRelatedWork W400615079 @default.
- W752669732 hasVolume "12" @default.
- W752669732 isParatext "false" @default.
- W752669732 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W752669732 magId "752669732" @default.
- W752669732 workType "article" @default.