FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W758590143> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W758590143 startingPage "481" @default.
• W758590143 abstract "The use of behavioral economic games to measure social cognition in mental illness has increased over the past five years (Clark et al., 2013; King-Casas & Chui, 2012; King-Casas et al., 2008; Koenigs, Kruepke, & Newman, 2010; Sharp, 2013; Sharp, Fonagy, & Ha, 2011; Sharp et al., 2011). Behavioral economic games are research paradigms that present a social conflict involving actual money and other people. A typical example would be forcing people to choose between keeping money for themselves and investing it with other members of a group. Part of the reason for the proliferation of these games is their structure allows for examination of real over hypothetical behavior. In addition, the presentation of a real situation and the measure of observable versus self-report behavior are considered advantageous, because of potential generalizability to similar social situations. These games have recently been used to examine a variety of social thought processes associated in clinical disorders such as the ability to sustain reciprocity (Clark et al., 2013), the ability to establish and repair trust (King-Case et al., 2008), and emotional responses to unfairness (Harle et al., 2010). While these games have typically been used in economics, their application to the measure of individual differences in mental health related research has shown tremendous promise, as these measurement tools present a departure from traditional forms of psychological assessment that may be especially applicable to the study of social cognition. Although these games appear to have a high degree of generalizability to other situations, it is still not clear what precisely the games are measuring. While this is less of a problem in the more traditional economic uses for these games, it has the potential to hold back the science as these games are used to assess social cognition in clinical populations. For example, is the breakdown of cooperation associated with depressive affect (Clark et al., 2013) and Borderline Personality Disorder (King-Casas et al., 2008) a facet of these disorders or might it be explained by the high degree of neuroticism associated with these disorders? If the latter is true, then this speaks to the need of controlling for neuroticism in comparisons with these populations and other design and statistical considerations that will impact work with clinical research samples. These games appear to differentiate clinical from non-clinical populations, yet it is not clear why, because the precise nature of what these games measure has not been established. It is necessary to determine the impact of well understood constructs on these games to determine what they are measuring. While answering the question of what precisely is being measured will likely take numerous studies, correlation work is the first step and that is what this study seeks to do. This project looks to establish the relationships between the well-researched five-factor model (FFM) of personality and four different behavioral economic games. The FFM measures individuals across five domains of personality, i.e., Neuroticism, Extroversion, Openness to new experiences, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness (Costa & McCrae, 1992). While the FFM model has been consistently found to be popular in the U.S. and other countries and to represent stable personality characteristics (McCrae, 2002; McCrae, Costa, Del Pilar, Rolland, & Parker, 1998), the few studies that have compared five-factor measures to behavioral economic games have shown inconsistent findings. Hirsh and Peterson (2009) used a five-factor inventory that condensed each of the big five dimensions into two facet scales. These authors found that higher levels of withdrawal (neuroticism) and enthusiasm (extraversion) predicted increased likelihood of cooperation in a 10-round prisoner's dilemma. Withdrawal is similar to fear and the authors concluded that fear of repercussions may be driving cooperation for these individuals while enthusiasm was associated with being more social. …" @default.
• W758590143 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W758590143 creator A5015807781 @default.
• W758590143 creator A5040663799 @default.
• W758590143 creator A5050815332 @default.
• W758590143 creator A5054454197 @default.
• W758590143 date "2014-12-01" @default.
• W758590143 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W758590143 title "Five-Factor Personality and Cooperative Behavior" @default.
• W758590143 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W758590143 type Work @default.
• W758590143 sameAs 758590143 @default.
• W758590143 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W758590143 countsByYear W7585901432015 @default.
• W758590143 countsByYear W7585901432020 @default.
• W758590143 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W758590143 hasAuthorship W758590143A5015807781 @default.
• W758590143 hasAuthorship W758590143A5040663799 @default.
• W758590143 hasAuthorship W758590143A5050815332 @default.
• W758590143 hasAuthorship W758590143A5054454197 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C158608086 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C169903001 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C27158222 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C2865642 @default.
• W758590143 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C138496976 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C15744967 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C158608086 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C169760540 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C169900460 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C169903001 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C187288502 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C27158222 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C2865642 @default.
• W758590143 hasConceptScore W758590143C77805123 @default.
• W758590143 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W758590143 hasLocation W7585901431 @default.
• W758590143 hasOpenAccess W758590143 @default.
• W758590143 hasPrimaryLocation W7585901431 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W144956223 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W146933705 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W147215226 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W1500904697 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W19163440 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W1965589920 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W1974132134 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2059754649 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2079325387 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2091944506 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2143895143 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2331312196 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2415385589 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2469380212 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2478788798 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W25878055 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W2762584150 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W286143397 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W3122177334 @default.
• W758590143 hasRelatedWork W3145478273 @default.
• W758590143 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W758590143 isParatext "false" @default.
• W758590143 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W758590143 magId "758590143" @default.
• W758590143 workType "article" @default.