FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W75887676> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W75887676 startingPage "74" @default.
• W75887676 abstract "THIS ARTICLE AIMS to provide a brief update on archaeological activity on the sites of London's Tudor and Stuart playhouses. It is intended that it will provide readers with an understanding of the current situation with regard to archaeology and the playhouses and to create a wider awareness of the various forms of archaeological work that has taken place but is not always reported on. A bibliography at the end of this article will provide details of all reports referred to. The history of archaeological activity in relation to London's playhouses begins with the Museum of London's excavations at the site of the Rose playhouse in 1988-89. Prior to the discovery of the remains of the foundations of the Rose, the main forms of evidence concerning the type of structures in which plays were performed consisted of maps, panoramic drawings, and building accounts, coupled with the written accounts of contemporary travelers. The image that appeared from these forms of evidence was, at best, confusing and often contradictory. Whilst the evidence from the Rose excavation has not dispelled debate about these early structures, it has provided dramatic evidence of the foundations of one such playhouse and provides an invaluable tool to aid interpretation of the records of (among others) Philip Henslowe and the maps of John Norden. The uncovering of the remains of the Rose had a profound effect on the theater world and a similar one on the way in which archaeology is conducted in England. The Rose excavation (and the furor that surrounded it) resulted in the Department of Environment (1990) publishing planning guidance--Planning Policy Guidance 16, colloquially known as PPG 16--providing guidance on how archaeological remains should be dealt with in the planning and development process. As a result of this, archaeology is now a material consideration in the granting of planning consent, with most archaeological work paid for by commercial developers in advance of and during the course of development. The principle of the polluter paying for archaeology has lead to the increased privatization of archaeological work, the awarding of archaeological contracts primarily by competitive tender, and a move towards in situ to avoid time-consuming (and sometimes expensive) archaeological excavation. This philosophy of in situ (also conceived as a result of the backlog of unpublished material from excavations in the 1970s and 1980s) should provide a framework for the comprehension of policies followed on sites to be discussed in this article. PPG 16 provides planning authorities with a staged approach to the consideration of archaeological remains that may survive on a proposed development site and states that where there are nationally important archaeological remains ... that are affected by a proposed development there should be a presumption in favour of their physical preservation (DoE 1990, A8). Preservation in situ of archaeological remains does not, however, mean that they are preserved and available for public viewing and consumption but that they are often entombed beneath building foundations without the development impacting on the remains. After discussing the Rose, the article will move on to look at work on the sites of the Globe, the Bear Gardens, the Boar's Head, the Hope, and the steps taken towards protecting the sites of London's other Tudor and Stuart playhouses. The Rose The story of the excavation of the Rose and the political fallout surrounding the excavation have been dealt with elsewhere (Blatherwick 2000, Bowsher & Blatherwick 1990, Bowsher 1998, Eccles 1990), and it is not the focus of this article to deal with issues already reported on. It is worth, however, looking at the of the Rose and the future that the site holds. When the developers received their final planning consent in the summer of 1989, their new building (now named Rose Court) was designed in such a ,way as to ensure that it straddled the majority of the remains and that the pile foundations had minimal impact on known archaeological deposits. …" @default.
• W75887676 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W75887676 creator A5089478503 @default.
• W75887676 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W75887676 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W75887676 title "Archaeology Update: Four Playhouses and the Bear Garden" @default.
• W75887676 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W75887676 type Work @default.
• W75887676 sameAs 75887676 @default.
• W75887676 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W75887676 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W75887676 hasAuthorship W75887676A5089478503 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C25343380 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C2994278484 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C31858485 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W75887676 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C138885662 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C142362112 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C166957645 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C25343380 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C2994278484 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C31858485 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C41008148 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C41895202 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C52119013 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C527412718 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C77088390 @default.
• W75887676 hasConceptScore W75887676C95457728 @default.
• W75887676 hasLocation W758876761 @default.
• W75887676 hasOpenAccess W75887676 @default.
• W75887676 hasPrimaryLocation W758876761 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W141890046 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W1493147400 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W1706786345 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W176728529 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W1986849479 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W1993903479 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2050199378 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2222224419 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2338029030 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2463965416 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2486497485 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2517400152 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W25861914 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2951419178 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2978248101 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W3126000690 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W426948739 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W50969722 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W778849417 @default.
• W75887676 hasRelatedWork W2185792009 @default.
• W75887676 isParatext "false" @default.
• W75887676 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W75887676 magId "75887676" @default.
• W75887676 workType "article" @default.