FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W761380231> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W761380231 endingPage "843" @default.
• W761380231 startingPage "838" @default.
• W761380231 abstract "Turn-boundary projection: Looking ahead Marisa Tice (middyp@stanford.edu) Tania Henetz (thenetz@stanford.edu) Margaret Jacks Hall, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-2150 USA Jordan Hall, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-2150 USA Abstract 2006, but see Gravano & Hirschberg, 2011). Addressing turn projection experimentally, de Ruiter and colleagues (2006) asked Dutch speakers to listen to fragments of spontaneous speech and press a button at the moment they anticipated the speaker would be finished speaking. The stimuli were manip- ulated phonetically, controlling for potential projection cues such as intonation, lexicosyntactic information, and rhythm. Their results suggest that speakers rely primarily on lexical information (which also provides syntactic cues) to identify upcoming turn-end boundaries. Coordinating with others is hard; and yet we accomplish this every day when we take turns in a conversation. How do we do this? The present study introduces a new method of measuring turn-boundary projection that enables researchers to achieve more valid, flexible, and temporally informative data on online turn projection: tracking an observer’s gaze from the current speaker to the next speaker. In this preliminary investigation, participants consistently looked at the current speaker during their turn. Additionally, they looked to the next speaker before her turn began, and sometimes even before the current speaker finished speaking. This suggests that observer gaze is closely aligned with perceptual processes of turn-boundary projection, and thus may equip the field with the tools to explore how we manage to take turns. Keywords: Turn-taking; Social cognition; Eye tracking; Co- ordination; Timing; Conversation; Interaction The experimental approach introduced by de Ruiter et al. (2006) is an significant step forward in research on boundary projection, but there is still much to be addressed. Specifi- cally, we do not know how to account for boundary projec- tion as the turn is unfolding. Listeners have access to only that information which has already been spoken, and so their use of cues may differ over the course of a turn. For ex- ample, it could be the case that listeners track intonation as a primary cue to the beginning of a turn’s denouement, and then increase their reliance on lexical information to precisely identify the end of the upcoming syntactic clause. The infor- mation that listeners use to track upcoming turn boundaries should reflect their integrated knowledge of all the cues avail- able to them as the turn is unfolding. Introduction Interacting with others requires us to make a number of com- plex linguistic, social, and cognitive decisions. Despite this, most conversations proceed smoothly, allowing us to take for granted the intricate processes taking place in getting the tim- ing of our actions right on cue. Turn-taking during conversa- tion is one phenomenon that exemplifies these issues. Intu- itively we seem to wait for the current speaker to stop talk- ing before we start conjuring up a response, with each turn preceded and followed by orderly pauses or ‘gaps’ in speak- ing. But this is not the case: not only do we not ‘wait’, but there are often no gaps between speakers at all! Speakers are extremely adept at taking turns efficiently, averaging 0.2- 0.4 second gaps in face-to-face conversation (Brady, 1968; Stivers et al., 2009) and 0.7 second gaps over the phone (Jaffe & Feldstein, 1970), often with less than 5% overlap (Levinson, 1983). This general pattern has been observed across many cultures, leading researchers to conclude that in- terlocutors adhere to standards of no-gap-no-overlap in trans- ferring turns from one speaker to the next (de Ruiter et al., 2006; Sacks et al., 1974; Stivers et al., 2009). To accom- plish this no-gap-no-overlap timing, listeners must be able to actively project the end of the current speaker’s turn (here- after, turn-end boundary), while simultaneously starting to plan their response. The prevailing method of investigating how projection takes place is to use corpora to identify linguistic cues that co- incide with turn-end boundaries (e.g. prosodic, syntactic, and pragmatic boundaries; (Ford & Thompson, 1996; Caspers, 2003)). But these cues often co-occur, making it difficult to interpret relative cue importance. Additionally, some of these cues might come too late for listeners to make use of them, for instance, lengthening of the final word in an utter- ance happens nearly at the end of the turn (de Ruiter et al., The button-press methodology gives us a single point in the turn at which to test a manipulation. It is incapable of track- ing listeners’ ongoing certainty level about upcoming turn- end boundaries; especially in cases where there is a possible, or even probable, but not realized turn-end (e.g. “Did I ever tell you about my Aunt Millie? She was a wild one.”). In listening to this signal, participants in a button-press experi- ment are likely to enter their response after “Millie” or after “one.” In the case that they were not fooled by the first po- tential turn-end place, the single button press could not tell us about their ongoing projection: how close they came to thinking of it as a turn-end boundary, what cues were im- portant at the time, et cetera. The button-press also adds an “input” requirement to the task, which might be sensitive to the task instructions. An ideal measure of anticipation would not require explicit instructions, easing the cognitive load on participants that might arise from the specific task. We propose a new method of investigating turn-projection behavior: tracking observer gaze. In the utterance about Aunt Millie, gaze might reveal a robust effect of the initial proba- ble turn-end point: a gradient increase and then decrease in transition-related looks as the utterance continues. Button- pressing, in contrast, indicates the point in time when the ob- server felt they had sufficient evidence to respond to an utter-" @default.
• W761380231 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W761380231 creator A5010339997 @default.
• W761380231 creator A5063996556 @default.
• W761380231 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W761380231 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W761380231 title "Turn-boundary projection: Looking ahead" @default.
• W761380231 cites W1973731132 @default.
• W761380231 cites W1985479696 @default.
• W761380231 cites W1987324026 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2000769658 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2008741806 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2012644758 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2015111784 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2025254780 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2086568921 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2102722370 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2117883040 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2124548978 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2129090275 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2131709139 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2137066512 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2153190547 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2158680234 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2162634167 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2237495196 @default.
• W761380231 cites W258661234 @default.
• W761380231 cites W2978351870 @default.
• W761380231 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W761380231 type Work @default.
• W761380231 sameAs 761380231 @default.
• W761380231 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W761380231 countsByYear W7613802312012 @default.
• W761380231 countsByYear W7613802312013 @default.
• W761380231 countsByYear W7613802312015 @default.
• W761380231 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W761380231 hasAuthorship W761380231A5010339997 @default.
• W761380231 hasAuthorship W761380231A5063996556 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C2776352735 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C2777200299 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C2779916870 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W761380231 hasConcept C57493831 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C11413529 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C138885662 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C154945302 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C15744967 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C169760540 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C26760741 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C2776352735 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C2777200299 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C2779916870 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C41008148 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C41895202 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C46312422 @default.
• W761380231 hasConceptScore W761380231C57493831 @default.
• W761380231 hasIssue "33" @default.
• W761380231 hasLocation W7613802311 @default.
• W761380231 hasOpenAccess W761380231 @default.
• W761380231 hasPrimaryLocation W7613802311 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W1495343623 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W1538108491 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W1964725106 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W1985479696 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2047247026 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2072921909 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2113355906 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2129090275 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2132686760 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2137066512 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2153190547 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2162634167 @default.
• W761380231 hasRelatedWork W2237495196 @default.
• W761380231 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W761380231 isParatext "false" @default.
• W761380231 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W761380231 magId "761380231" @default.
• W761380231 workType "article" @default.