FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W76304879> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W76304879 startingPage "60" @default.
• W76304879 abstract "As the workhorse of the payments system, checks have always been vulnerable to abuse--and continue to be the target of fraud, a recent ABA survey points out. Though society's criminals and cheats are the exception, have had their effect on the banking system and its rules. In addition to driving up operating costs, fraud often costs a bank its reputation with the customer and depletes organizational morale. Combating fraud requires training, account screening, signature verification, and information sharing with regulators and local authorities, bankers say. ABA tracks check fraud through annual industry surveys conducted since 1992. The most current of these suggests that loss due to check fraud--generally defined as the intentional negotiation of a check without the account holder's approval or authorization--has amounted to $512.3 million in 1997, a 5.2% increase over the $487.1 million estimated for 1995 by the Federal Reserve. Check fraud includes schemes such as check kiting or forging a signature or endorsement. Losses to all size banks A national sample of 5,000 banks (clustered in three asset groups--small, medium, and large) showed that one in two institutions, or 48.3% of the survey sample, suffered financial losses from check fraud in 1997. Losses were reported by 49% of community banks, 90.5% of mid-sized banks, and by all large institutions. The estimated losses did not include check-fraud loss avoidance as a result of banks' prevention systems and procedures. Such potential losses amounted to 113% of actual reported losses during that time. (Note, for comparison, that total deposits held by commercial banks grew 12.8% between 1995-97.) The number and dollar amount of check fraud losses show considerable variation by bank size and within size category. Community banks reported a median of four fraud cases in 1997, with a total median loss of $5,590 per bank. Mid-sized banks reported 40 cases, with a total median loss of $53,265 per bank. Regional banks reported 638 cases with a total median loss of $1.2 million per institution. Superregional/money center banks reported 2,169 cases with a total median loss of $11.1 million per institution. To combat fraud, many banks have allocated resources to their internal systems, operations, and investigation functions. Methods to the madness Checks written against consumer accounts were the most common source of check fraud. …" @default.
• W76304879 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W76304879 creator A5087348624 @default.
• W76304879 date "1999-04-01" @default.
• W76304879 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W76304879 title "ABA Survey Says: Check Fraud Increasing" @default.
• W76304879 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W76304879 type Work @default.
• W76304879 sameAs 76304879 @default.
• W76304879 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W76304879 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W76304879 hasAuthorship W76304879A5087348624 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C2777303138 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C2983355114 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
• W76304879 hasConcept C76178495 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C10138342 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C121955636 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C144133560 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C145097563 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C162118730 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C17744445 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C185592680 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C198531522 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C199539241 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C2777303138 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C2983355114 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C38652104 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C41008148 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C43617362 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C48798503 @default.
• W76304879 hasConceptScore W76304879C76178495 @default.
• W76304879 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W76304879 hasLocation W763048791 @default.
• W76304879 hasOpenAccess W76304879 @default.
• W76304879 hasPrimaryLocation W763048791 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W1004583291 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W129225269 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W1536061408 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W1550540546 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W168195758 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W186709031 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2009092105 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2261660024 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W229566928 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2313695581 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2605887734 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2793104349 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2883102057 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2899106642 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2911426196 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W2915110916 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W300693727 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W3125942281 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W3207706146 @default.
• W76304879 hasRelatedWork W9569796 @default.
• W76304879 hasVolume "91" @default.
• W76304879 isParatext "false" @default.
• W76304879 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W76304879 magId "76304879" @default.
• W76304879 workType "article" @default.