FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W764175041> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W764175041 startingPage "1454" @default.
• W764175041 abstract "IntroductionStudy of social policy has long been influenced by Esping-Anderson (1982) formulation, that social welfare is typified into three groups. Using the degree by which people are shield -off? or protection from negative impact of the market, Esping-Anderson classified social welfare into three type, the highest level of protection which is characterized as the state welfare, the middle level of protection which the state and the market play the lead role providing security, and the lowest level of protection where security of people are entirely relied on the market provision. However, there has been increasingly argued that Esping-Anderson formulation does not compatible with the types of welfare regimes of the developing worlds. Woods see the welfare regime is dominated by informal security regime?, while Bevan (2004) argue that in a number of developing and underdeveloped countries, the insecurity regimes? is the dominant type of welfare regime. In case of Thailand, the welfare regime can be classified as productivist? welfare regime. This is primarily due to the long-time continual high rate of economic growth of Thailand, especially during the 1970s and 1990s. The welfare regime of Thailand is thus shapped by production? side, effort of the state was laid emphasis on production, and high rate of economic growth is presumed to result in wellbeing of the citizens.Although the productivist model may offer way of understanding welfare and social policy of Thailand at aggregated level, this idea contains one important weakness. This is particularly due to the fact that the economic growth of Thailand is unevenly by nature (Pawnwell; 1995). Growth has been accentuated around Bangkok Methropolitant. Income gap has been large. In this light, the productivist welfare regime can be relevant and explained only section of Thai society, especially the section that benefits economic growth. The populations of Thailand living outside Bangkok Metropolis, particularly those who earn their living from agriculture in rural areas are sustaining their living differently.From the past few years, the political landscapes of welfare and social policy of the western worlds have changed significantly, due to waves of economic crisis. In this context, social policies of macro level are focusing on rescueing the system rather than developing new options for better life of the citizens. Meanwhile there has been evolving small-scale of actions or coping strategies (Ewert and Evers 2014; 1) that are diverse in forms and localtions. This move is also relervant to the developing countries, including Thailand, in that under the limitation of macro social policies, there has been diverse forms of straties?. Frequently, these forms of copping strategies are refered to, in Thailand, as alternative welfare?.Khon Kaen: Local Landscape of Social Policy and WelfareKhon Kaen was assigned to be the Regional Capital City? of the Northeast of Thailand from the inception of modern development in the early 1960s. As a result, Khon Kaen became the centre of government services. At present there are more than 484 government agencies of the central government located in Khon Kaen. Khon Kaen has recently been the medical centre and education centre (Khon Kaen Provincial Office, 2013). In the past 2 decades, factories and businesses have grown around Khon Kaen Town, partly due to the growth pole policy in which major towns of the regions were promoted to become regional industrial centre. In 2013, Khon Kaen houses 4,131 factories, employing over 66,000 labourers. The population of Khon Kaen is currently about 1.9 million. In 2010, the official statistics states that Gross Provincial Product (GPP) from agriculture is slightly above 20,000 million Baht, representing roughtly about 13 percent of the total, while GPP of non-agriculture is above 135,000 million representing about 87 percent of the total GPP. …" @default.
• W764175041 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W764175041 creator A5034446032 @default.
• W764175041 creator A5073403377 @default.
• W764175041 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W764175041 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W764175041 title "Alternative Welfare in Rural Thailand: A Case Study of Khon Kaen Province" @default.
• W764175041 cites W180939363 @default.
• W764175041 cites W2068314534 @default.
• W764175041 cites W2094066118 @default.
• W764175041 cites W2157207849 @default.
• W764175041 cites W2187312300 @default.
• W764175041 cites W2289218264 @default.
• W764175041 cites W255213721 @default.
• W764175041 cites W3203774158 @default.
• W764175041 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W764175041 type Work @default.
• W764175041 sameAs 764175041 @default.
• W764175041 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W764175041 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W764175041 hasAuthorship W764175041A5034446032 @default.
• W764175041 hasAuthorship W764175041A5073403377 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C100243477 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C129603779 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C196013401 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C2777111884 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C47768531 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C536738050 @default.
• W764175041 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C100001284 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C100243477 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C129603779 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C162324750 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C17744445 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C196013401 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C199539241 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C2777111884 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C34447519 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C47768531 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C50522688 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C536738050 @default.
• W764175041 hasConceptScore W764175041C94625758 @default.
• W764175041 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W764175041 hasLocation W7641750411 @default.
• W764175041 hasOpenAccess W764175041 @default.
• W764175041 hasPrimaryLocation W7641750411 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W14857300 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W1560403586 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W1736540841 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2115097362 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2120002682 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2318321588 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2488648843 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2593617364 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2944245123 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2961394949 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W3042362756 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W3123410344 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W3144984037 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W3148437719 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W3164641358 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W3166388964 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2155851097 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2183318487 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2187523638 @default.
• W764175041 hasRelatedWork W2189460560 @default.
• W764175041 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W764175041 isParatext "false" @default.
• W764175041 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W764175041 magId "764175041" @default.
• W764175041 workType "article" @default.