FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W773776942> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W773776942 startingPage "59" @default.
• W773776942 abstract "This paper assesses the amended Canada's Amended Youth Criminal Justice Act introduction of deterrence as an additional sentencing aim through analyses of a subset of interviews with persistent male youth offenders recruited in a youth correctional facility in southern Ontario. The analysis attends to how the youths' accounts of violence, crime, and rehabilitative intervention efforts fit with government insistence that a stronger deterrence message is needed to reverse the damage of a justice system that scholars concur largely missed the global punitive turn. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relevance of the Canadian case to the globalization of juvenile justice, a development marked by the contradictory embrace of punitivism, on the one hand, and crime-prevention jurisprudence, on the other.In 2012, Stephen Harper's Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) amended the prevention oriented Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) as part of this government's larger and ongoing tough-on-crime overhaul of the Canadian justice system. As enacted in 2002, the YCJA aimed to divert as many minor youth offenders as possible away from the courts, provide a range of community-based non-custodial interventions for midrange offenders, and reserve custody for violent and repeat offenders. At the same time, it presumed that a youth age 14 or older found guilty of murder, attempted murder, aggravated sexual assault or a third serious violent offence would be subject to an adult sentence, though this presumption was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2008 (R. v. D.B., 2008).1 Consistent with the overall intent to reduce reliance on custody, deterrence was neither an explicit nor implied sentencing aim. Rather, as outlined in previous reviews (e.g., Bala, Carrington, & Roberts, 2009), the goal of extrajudicial diversions and sentencing alike was to provide meaningful consequences that fostered rehabilitation and reintegration 'in order to promote the long-term protection of the public' (pre-amended § 3(1)).Among other changes, the 2012 amendments foreground public protection and accountability over rehabilitation and prevention (§ 3(1), broaden criteria for holding youth in pre-trial detention (§ 29(2) and sentenced custody (§ 39(1) and add deterrence and denunciation as sentencing objectives a youth court 'may' consider (§ 38(2)(f)). The amendments do not, however, eliminate the presumption that 'extrajudicial measures are often the most appropriate and effective way to address youth crime' (§ 4). Moreover, while the amended Declaration of Principle (§ 3(1) deletes reference to the long-term protection of the public, 'contributing' to this outcome remains the purpose of sentencing :The purpose of sentencing under section 42 (youth sentences) is to hold a young person accountable for an offence through the imposition of just sanctions that have meaningful consequences for the young person and that promote his or her rehabilitation and reintegration into society, thereby contributing to the long-term protection of the public. (§38(1).Recognizing the importance of differentiating symbolic from practical aims and impacts (Doob & Webster, 2006), this paper assesses the amended YCJA's introduction of deterrence as an additional sentencing aim through analyses of a subset of interviews with persistent male youth offenders recruited in a youth correctional facility in southern Ontario in 2005-2006 (n = 20). The analysis attends to how the youths' accounts of violence, crime, and rehabilitative intervention efforts fit with government insistence that a stronger deterrence message is needed to 'reverse the damage' (Mann, 2014, p. 413) of a justice system that scholars concur largely missed the global 'punitive turn' (Meyer & O'Malley, 2005) that David Garland (2000) first identified (see also Donohue & Moore, 2009; Lynch, 2012; Moore & HannahMoffat, 2005; O'Malley, 1999, 2002; Webster & Doob 2007, 2014). …" @default.
• W773776942 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W773776942 creator A5015474320 @default.
• W773776942 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W773776942 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W773776942 title "Canada's Amended Youth Criminal Justice Act and the Problem of Serious Persistent Youth Offenders: Deterrence and the Globalization of Juvenile Justice" @default.
• W773776942 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W773776942 type Work @default.
• W773776942 sameAs 773776942 @default.
• W773776942 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W773776942 countsByYear W7737769422015 @default.
• W773776942 countsByYear W7737769422017 @default.
• W773776942 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W773776942 hasAuthorship W773776942A5015474320 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C2780253743 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C2780982575 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W773776942 hasConcept C83645499 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C102587632 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C118552586 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C138885662 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C139621336 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C144024400 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C15744967 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C17744445 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C199539241 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C2778137410 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C2778272461 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C2780253743 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C2780665704 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C2780982575 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C41895202 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C73484699 @default.
• W773776942 hasConceptScore W773776942C83645499 @default.
• W773776942 hasIssue "14" @default.
• W773776942 hasLocation W7737769421 @default.
• W773776942 hasOpenAccess W773776942 @default.
• W773776942 hasPrimaryLocation W7737769421 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W1484260662 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W1550991832 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W1603694498 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W1710254217 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W1814157025 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W1949414580 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W1999615685 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2055867103 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2077609337 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2091677921 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2142690680 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2145944193 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2254531182 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2483007710 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2493680583 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2735441466 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W2992455391 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W3123331895 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W3159354755 @default.
• W773776942 hasRelatedWork W3121978836 @default.
• W773776942 isParatext "false" @default.
• W773776942 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W773776942 magId "773776942" @default.
• W773776942 workType "article" @default.