FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W775691504> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W775691504 startingPage "120" @default.
• W775691504 abstract "ABSTRACT.The aim of the present study is to examine and evaluate the effectiveness of peer review, peer-reviewed contributions as a measure of scientific advancement, the reliability and fairness of peer review, and the reliance on IF to evaluate scientific quality. In this paper I am particularly interested in exploring the fairness of peer review, the impact factor as a marker of quality of articles in certain academic settings, and the extent to which peer review is achieving an improvement in scholarship.JEL Classification: D83, I23, O3Keywords: peer review, scientific publication process, manuscript qualityThere seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too trivial, no literature citation too biased or too egotistical, no design too warped, no methodology too bungled, no presentation of results too inaccurate, too obscure, and too contradictory, no analysis too selfserving, no argument too circular, no conclusions too trifling or too unjustified, and no grammar and syntax too offensive for a paper to end up in print.Drummond Rennie1. IntroductionOver the past decade, there has been increasing evidence describing the scientific publication process, the peer review of research manuscripts submitted to scientific journals, the incremental nature of scientific progress, and the ethics underlying the peer reviewing of scientific manuscripts. mainstay of the paper is formed an analysis of the influence of peer review on manuscript quality, the quality of scientific information, imperfections in the peer review process, and the pressure to disseminate science.2. Ethics Underlying the Reviewing of Scientific ManuscriptsBenos et al. put it that the process of peer review serves an important role in scientific publication (the core assumptions inherent in the process of peer review must be evaluated and adapted to the changing environment): well-organized forms of free information exchange may provide useful models for scientific publication, an open review process makes research available immediately and allows multiple people to comment upon a manuscript, whereas how often an article is cited may be a reasonable proxy for the impact of the paper on the scientific community. Peer review provides a formal opportunity for authors to gauge reaction to their work as well as allowing for the possible detection and subsequent correction of errors or flaws in logic prior to an article's appearance in the public domain. Thus, peer review infuses 'added value' into a publication.1 Hakkalamani et al. maintain that a high self-citation rate and citation density may influence the impact factor of a journal, and that may be overcome by an article-byarticle citation count and calculation of the impact factor after elimination of self-citing, correction a factor for self-citation and setting the limit for the citation density.2Triggle and Triggle affirm that peer review should provide due diligence to a manuscript: it is an essential component of the scientific review process, providing quality control so that the published works meet appropriate standards. Triggle and Triggle hold that a paper in a high impact journal does not necessarily equate with a high impact paper: it is essential to evaluate the impact of the individual paper and take into account where it was published and how well it has been cited and whom. The benefit to the authors of publishing in a high profile journal is the anticipation that their article will have greater visibility and, therefore, more likely to be cited. Such benefit also contributes to the pressure to obtain results and to publish, a pressure that is not necessarily always beneficial to science or to the scientist.3 Opthof et al. say that the peer review process can help selecting papers with a high scientific quality, and is valuable in selecting highly cited papers: it is employed editors as a selection method, and assists in improving the quality of the submitted manuscripts (the unrestricted exchange of thought and criticism is at the root of the scientific process). …" @default.
• W775691504 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W775691504 creator A5034782639 @default.
• W775691504 date "2012-03-01" @default.
• W775691504 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W775691504 title "The Pressure of Publishing in Academia" @default.
• W775691504 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W775691504 type Work @default.
• W775691504 sameAs 775691504 @default.
• W775691504 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W775691504 countsByYear W7756915042016 @default.
• W775691504 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W775691504 hasAuthorship W775691504A5034782639 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C110754006 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C176856949 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C23213167 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C2778949450 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C2779455604 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C2781083858 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C95121780 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W775691504 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C110754006 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C111472728 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C111919701 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C126322002 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C127413603 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C136764020 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C138368954 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C138885662 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C142724271 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C151719136 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C151730666 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C15744967 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C176856949 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C17744445 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C199539241 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C204787440 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C23213167 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C2778805511 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C2778949450 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C2779455604 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C2779530757 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C2781083858 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C41008148 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C41895202 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C42475967 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C71924100 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C86803240 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C95121780 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C98045186 @default.
• W775691504 hasConceptScore W775691504C98184364 @default.
• W775691504 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W775691504 hasLocation W7756915041 @default.
• W775691504 hasOpenAccess W775691504 @default.
• W775691504 hasPrimaryLocation W7756915041 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W1853073683 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W1967569030 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W1977146885 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W1982079713 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W1982977524 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2007189240 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2028827168 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2101879767 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2105345360 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2116807595 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2117781437 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2118338088 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2185936937 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2208181970 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2336034417 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2444024459 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2760745675 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2898702502 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W2922015415 @default.
• W775691504 hasRelatedWork W1531416379 @default.
• W775691504 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W775691504 isParatext "false" @default.

• next