FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W778880611> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W778880611 endingPage "376" @default.
• W778880611 startingPage "341" @default.
• W778880611 abstract "In this article we propose the establishment of a Drone Court to review Executive Branch drone decisions prior to their execution. That said, we harken back to Chief Justice Earl Warren’s wise words in Miranda v Arizona in which he called on, if not challenged, Congress and others to recommend alternative means to protect those subject to police interrogations. In the spirit of Chief Justice Warren’s entreaty, we are not wedded to the establishment of a Drone Court. Moreover, we do not claim to have all of the answers. We are, however, wedded to the creation of a process that will ensure that U.S. counterterrorism be conducted in accordance with the rule of law and the principles of morality in armed conflict which can effectively and concretely be monitored and measured. In other words, we advocate for the use of drones falling into alignment with the precepts of legitimacy explored in this volume. We present our proposal in the context of two realities that must be noted for the record. The first reality is that since the horrific attacks on September 11, 2001, the United States has struggled, as it never has in its history, with finding the appropriate balance between the protection of individual rights and the demands of national security. Repeatedly, as we note below, particularly in the area of surveillance, national security has trumped individual rights leading to abuses that have shocked the nation and led to calls for reform. Those abuses have occurred despite the formal existence of institutions intended to maintain the balance of power among the branches of government. Thus, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) was established pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) supposedly to insure that Executive Branch decisions with respect to surveillance were carried out in a way to protect the rights of those surveilled. The reality, however, is that fundamental flaws in the structure of the FISC, detailed more fully below, have turned the court more into a rubber stamp of Executive decision-making than a constitutional buffer between citizens and Executive Branch abuses that FISA sought to eliminate. Indeed, the mere existence of FISC has been cleverly used by the Executive branch to bolster claims that the massive surveillance programs disclosed since 9/11 pass constitutional muster – after all, goes the argument, the FISC said it was OK! We are under no illusion that the same process might not occur were a Drone Court to be established. It too, if not constructed properly with safeguards to maintain its independence, could be hijacked and used as a shield for abusive Executive decision-making rather than as a sword to insure appropriate checks on the Executive Branch. The task will not be easy. The lessons learned from past abuses must be incorporated into the Drone Court structure and the Court must have sufficient power to insure that the Executive responds in good faith to the requirements imposed on it. As we make our proposal, we recognize that such a structure has yet to be created in America’s 250-year struggle to find the appropriate balance between individual rights and national security. We believe, however, that if we keep that struggle in mind, along with past dismal failures, we may have the best hope of succeeding in the future. It is with that mindset that this proposal is offered, knowing the perils that may exist, including the misuse by the Executive Branch of a judicial order sanctioning its decision-making in the name of national security." @default.
• W778880611 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W778880611 creator A5016190112 @default.
• W778880611 creator A5071959468 @default.
• W778880611 date "2016-03-09" @default.
• W778880611 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W778880611 title "Establishment of a Drone Court: A Necessary Restraint on Executive Power" @default.
• W778880611 doi "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592152-23" @default.
• W778880611 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W778880611 type Work @default.
• W778880611 sameAs 778880611 @default.
• W778880611 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W778880611 countsByYear W7788806112016 @default.
• W778880611 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W778880611 hasAuthorship W778880611A5016190112 @default.
• W778880611 hasAuthorship W778880611A5071959468 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C30048959 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C46295352 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C528167355 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C59519942 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C8705443 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W778880611 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C121332964 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C139621336 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C144024400 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C163258240 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C166957645 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C170706310 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C17744445 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C199539241 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C2779343474 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C30048959 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C46295352 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C528167355 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C54355233 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C59519942 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C62520636 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C86803240 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C8705443 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C94625758 @default.
• W778880611 hasConceptScore W778880611C95457728 @default.
• W778880611 hasLocation W7788806111 @default.
• W778880611 hasOpenAccess W778880611 @default.
• W778880611 hasPrimaryLocation W7788806111 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W139938255 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W1567104279 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W2179647680 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W22213186 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W2300363847 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W233182827 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W233465426 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W280848873 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W3094436815 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W3121253383 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W3121492764 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W3122943410 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W3125750140 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W3159138567 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W3184835005 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W3210117233 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W339701539 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W348677536 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W367015660 @default.
• W778880611 hasRelatedWork W65634332 @default.
• W778880611 isParatext "false" @default.
• W778880611 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W778880611 magId "778880611" @default.
• W778880611 workType "book-chapter" @default.