FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W779037903> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W779037903 abstract "Field studies were carried out for the purpose of evaluating fertilizer nitrogen (N) recovery of upland cotton by use of the difference technique. The treatments under study included :i)check (no fertilizer N applied), ii)standard approach (preplant and sidedress), iii)feedback approach (based upon soil and plant factors), and iv)2X feedback approach. The studies were carried out at two locations Maricopa (MAC) and Marana (MAR). MAC is a low elevation location with a coarser textured soil compared to the MAR location. 'DPL -20' was the variety used in both locations, except for the early years at MAC where 'DPL -90' was used. The sources of fertilizer N were urea and ammonium sulphate, which were sidedress and split applied. In general, for the MAC location the final N fertilizer rates (NFR) applied were higher than for MAR due to higher yield potentials. The total N uptake increased as the NFR increased. The N use efficiency (NUE) values were reduced as NFR increased. The N fertilizer uptake (NFU) showed a decreasing pattern in the first years, and then an increasing trend; which was coupled with rather high amounts of N taken up in the check plot (soil N mineralized). When the N uptake in the check plot was high, NFU values were low, and vice versa. At MAC the N uptake in the check plot, apparently due to mineralized soil N revealed a slight increasing trend during the first years and then, after the fourth year, a rapid reduction of the mineralized soil N (check plot). A similar pattern was observed for MAR, although the total amount ofNtaken up was smaller compared to the MAC location. Introduction In desert agricultural areas water and N are the two major agronomic inputs. It is important for farmers to use N fertilizer efficiently to maintain an optimum return in yield for the amount of N fertilizer provided. Also, from an environmental standpoint, it is important to manage N fertilizer so as to minimize nitrate (NO3) leaching losses. Fertilizer N recovery by a crop can be estimated by two different techniques: 1)the difference (or indirect) technique, and 2)the 15N (or direct) technique. With the difference technique an apparent recovery fraction (ARF) is calculated from the amounts of N taken up by the crops in unfertilized (NP,,) and fertilized plots (NP), and the amount of N fertilizer applied (NF) (Alcoz, et. al., 1993; Harmsen and Moraghan, 1988; Rao et. al., 1991; Rao et. al., 1992; Roberts andHanzen, 1990) according to equation 1: ARF = ( N1slPo) / NF (1) The difference method generally provides higher fertilizer N recovery estimates than the 15N technique (Carefoot et. al., 1993; Harmsen and Moraghan, 1988; Hauck and Bremner, 1976; Rao et. al., 1991). The basic assumption associated with the difference method is that immobilization-mineralization and other N transformations which are operativeduring the course of the experiment are the same for both fertilized and unfertilized plots. This assumption is often questioned because fertilized plots have shown to have greater N mineralization and root development than unfertilized plots ( Harmsen and Moraghan, 1988; Westerman and Kurtz, 1974). Relatively low fertilizer N recoveries have been reported for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), which has been increased by using nitrification inhibitors (Freney et. al., 1993). Field experiments were established from 1989 through 1995 at the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center (MAC) and Marana Agricultural Center (MAR) with the following objectives: 1)estimate the NUE of several rates of N fertilizer on upland cotton using the difference technique; 2)compare the NUE of upland cotton grown in two locations" @default.
• W779037903 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W779037903 creator A5016861760 @default.
• W779037903 creator A5057728354 @default.
• W779037903 creator A5078034441 @default.
• W779037903 date "1997-03-01" @default.
• W779037903 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W779037903 title "Fertilizer Nitrogen Recovery in Irrigated Upland Cotton" @default.
• W779037903 cites W1970191992 @default.
• W779037903 cites W2020723601 @default.
• W779037903 cites W2021725049 @default.
• W779037903 cites W2042924626 @default.
• W779037903 cites W2043148199 @default.
• W779037903 cites W2076441381 @default.
• W779037903 cites W2079385331 @default.
• W779037903 cites W2080241710 @default.
• W779037903 cites W2195633930 @default.
• W779037903 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W779037903 type Work @default.
• W779037903 sameAs 779037903 @default.
• W779037903 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W779037903 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W779037903 hasAuthorship W779037903A5016861760 @default.
• W779037903 hasAuthorship W779037903A5057728354 @default.
• W779037903 hasAuthorship W779037903A5078034441 @default.
• W779037903 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W779037903 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W779037903 hasConcept C2780560099 @default.
• W779037903 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W779037903 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W779037903 hasConcept C537208039 @default.
• W779037903 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W779037903 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W779037903 hasConceptScore W779037903C178790620 @default.
• W779037903 hasConceptScore W779037903C185592680 @default.
• W779037903 hasConceptScore W779037903C2780560099 @default.
• W779037903 hasConceptScore W779037903C33923547 @default.
• W779037903 hasConceptScore W779037903C39432304 @default.
• W779037903 hasConceptScore W779037903C537208039 @default.
• W779037903 hasConceptScore W779037903C6557445 @default.
• W779037903 hasConceptScore W779037903C86803240 @default.
• W779037903 hasLocation W7790379031 @default.
• W779037903 hasOpenAccess W779037903 @default.
• W779037903 hasPrimaryLocation W7790379031 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W1540976776 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W1983029137 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W1992897439 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2018489757 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2020849169 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2034830220 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2039238177 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2044023561 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2057660121 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2085668167 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2090828917 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2115052356 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2254047750 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2320782927 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2414158843 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2915236519 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2917759846 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W2917835379 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W787239492 @default.
• W779037903 hasRelatedWork W819255809 @default.
• W779037903 isParatext "false" @default.
• W779037903 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W779037903 magId "779037903" @default.
• W779037903 workType "article" @default.