Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W7831051> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 60 of
60
with 100 items per page.
- W7831051 abstract "ABSTRACT Physical therapists in all practice settings-clinical, educational, and research-- are bound by legal and ethical professional standards governing practice. In recent times, the substance of these formerly distinct obligations have become blended into increasingly unitary standards of professional conduct. Courts now examine health care professional codes of ethics as secondary sources of legal obligation, licensure statutes and regulations derive from professional codes of ethics, and professional association ethics codes encompass legal concepts, including patient abandonment, informed consent, and confidentiality, among others. Physical therapists must simultaneously conform official conduct to legal as well as ethical standards to avoid sanctions on the privilege to practice in a variety of disciplinary forums. THE MODERN BLENDING OF LAW AND ETHICS Although legal and health care professional ethical obligations seemingly involve distinct duties incumbent upon physical therapists (and other health care professionals), in fact they have become in modern times very closely intertwined. What constitutes a breach of professional ethics more often than not also violates regulatory, civil, and/or criminal legal standards. This concept of duality of ethical-legal duties is referred to as the modem blending of health and ethics, and is illustrated in Figure 1. Modern legal standards and health care professional codes of ethics derived, in part, from the pronouncements and processes of medieval ecclesiastical and equity courts within the British commonwealth system. These specialty jurisdiction courts enforced moral standards and ensured fundamental fairness and justice, respectively. The sovereign law courts, or King's bench, on the other hand, strictly enforced written statutory laws, without explicit regard for morals or fairness. Historically, ecclesiastical courts reviewed church-related matters, including the fact and validity of marriage, and questions of legitimacy. Equity courts heard civil (private dispute) cases that could not be resolved through the ordinary mechanisms of justice in the courts and were the first to hear pro bono cases of poor litigants without the financial means to pay for requisite writs (legal papers). Over time, ecclesiastical courts were dissolved, and the and equity courts merged into the unitary legal system that exists in the Anglo-American world today.1 Part of the rationale for the modern blending of health and professional ethics relates to the fact that peoples within the western world are highly litigious, and societies inordinately legalistic--especially in the United States, where as many as 20 million new civil lawsuits are filed annually.2 Additionally, consumers (including patients) are better educated, more sophisticated, and acclimated to the legal culture, so that they more readily assert and enforce their legal rights. The processes of submitting claims to professional associations and licensure entities for breaches of health care professional ethics very closely mirror those for legal complaints within administrative, civil, and criminal legal systems. SOURCES OF LEGAL AND ETHICAL DUTIES Legal obligations bind everyone in society (except those with diplomatic immunity) to their provisions. Health care professional ethics codes formally obligate members of a health care discipline's professional association (and, indirectly, nonmembers as well) to their provisions and address professional conduct. There are four primary sources of legal obligation. They are briefly discussed in descending hierarchal order. The highest-order primary source of legal obligation in the United States is the federal Constitution, particularly, its Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments, which delineate personal rights and duties, including the constitutional right of privacy from undue governmental intrusion. …" @default.
- W7831051 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W7831051 creator A5081070740 @default.
- W7831051 date "2000-01-01" @default.
- W7831051 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W7831051 title "Supporting Professional Development: Understanding the Interplay Between Health Law and Professional Ethics" @default.
- W7831051 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00001416-200010000-00004" @default.
- W7831051 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W7831051 type Work @default.
- W7831051 sameAs 7831051 @default.
- W7831051 citedByCount "9" @default.
- W7831051 countsByYear W78310512012 @default.
- W7831051 countsByYear W78310512013 @default.
- W7831051 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W7831051 hasAuthorship W7831051A5081070740 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C128268270 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C170692843 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C2778426350 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C500143535 @default.
- W7831051 hasConcept C503263630 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C128268270 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C144024400 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C160735492 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C170692843 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C17744445 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C199539241 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C2778426350 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C500143535 @default.
- W7831051 hasConceptScore W7831051C503263630 @default.
- W7831051 hasLocation W78310511 @default.
- W7831051 hasOpenAccess W7831051 @default.
- W7831051 hasPrimaryLocation W78310511 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W1514806582 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W1526719596 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W1554440488 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W2122167630 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W2162975773 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W2165344024 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W2241327760 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W268225148 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W2790230246 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W2952781521 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W2954404490 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W3086266855 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W3121536627 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W3123194011 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W3135282368 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W3200084952 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W3211575305 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W1906146237 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W2155184987 @default.
- W7831051 hasRelatedWork W3123548508 @default.
- W7831051 isParatext "false" @default.
- W7831051 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W7831051 magId "7831051" @default.
- W7831051 workType "article" @default.