Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W784898903> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W784898903 endingPage "112" @default.
- W784898903 startingPage "1" @default.
- W784898903 abstract "When US courts deploy the hypothetical negotiation test to measure reasonable royalties as damages, they often refer to the 15 prong test in the Georgia-Pacific case for their adjudication guidelines. The first one factor, which is the amount of any pre-existing royalties, is universally agreed to have the greatest persuasive impact on the Court’s decisions. The other factors are with different applications of the guidelines resulting from the unique factual circumstances of each case. Because the hypothetical negotiation method relies on “assuming the royalties which the hypothetical licensor and the infringer would have agreed upon at the moment of the first infringement”, to serve as the basis for determining the measure of damages, and since it is “hypothetical”, it means that these factors and evidence thereof are naturally ex facto, so there are legitimate questions about whether these factors can accurately convey the patent rights’ value at the time of infringement or not. This method permits integrative consideration of many possible royalty calculation techniques and information before reaching an informed judgment. So it is very difficult to argue that the Court’s decisional results are unreasonable, rather one is left to argue about matters such as lost profits. The multifaceted nature of judicial applications of these 15 factors can result in commentators inability to see the forest for the trees, so this paper focuses on microanalysis of these 15 factors with respect to their evidences and purposes, grouping them into baseline factors(offering the baseline rate) and adjustment factors(bargaining power), as well as a meta-analysis of several representative methods considered in an integrated fashion from main baseline aspect, to discuss the influence of each of these 15 factors on the Court’s judgment. This paper also attempts to determine the relative importance of each factor with cases and economic analysis of Nash bargaining solution, and discusses the possible critiques of the Court’s deployment." @default.
- W784898903 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W784898903 creator A5014089957 @default.
- W784898903 creator A5024542293 @default.
- W784898903 creator A5065120727 @default.
- W784898903 creator A5068104759 @default.
- W784898903 date "2008-01-01" @default.
- W784898903 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W784898903 title "美國法院判定合理權利金之基準研究：以Georgia Pacific十五項要素分析" @default.
- W784898903 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W784898903 type Work @default.
- W784898903 sameAs 784898903 @default.
- W784898903 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W784898903 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
- W784898903 hasAuthorship W784898903A5014089957 @default.
- W784898903 hasAuthorship W784898903A5024542293 @default.
- W784898903 hasAuthorship W784898903A5065120727 @default.
- W784898903 hasAuthorship W784898903A5068104759 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C204434341 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C2777063073 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C2777381055 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C2992317946 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C48057960 @default.
- W784898903 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C10138342 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C119857082 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C144133560 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C145097563 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C151730666 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C162118730 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C162324750 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C17744445 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C190253527 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C199539241 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C199776023 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C204434341 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C2776291640 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C2777063073 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C2777267654 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C2777381055 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C2992317946 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C41008148 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C48057960 @default.
- W784898903 hasConceptScore W784898903C86803240 @default.
- W784898903 hasLocation W7848989031 @default.
- W784898903 hasOpenAccess W784898903 @default.
- W784898903 hasPrimaryLocation W7848989031 @default.
- W784898903 isParatext "false" @default.
- W784898903 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W784898903 magId "784898903" @default.
- W784898903 workType "dissertation" @default.