FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W812192969> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W812192969 endingPage "852" @default.
• W812192969 startingPage "843" @default.
• W812192969 abstract "ABSTRACTObjectives : The aims of the study were to examine perceived oral malodor and self-reported need for oral anddental care among patients receiving oral prophylaxis services and provide guidelines for developing educationalprograms(toothbrushing method and tongue cleaning) for oral hygiene and oral malodor prevention.Methods : The survey was administered to a sample of 462 receiving vol untary oral prophylaxis service in adental laboratory at the J School of Public Health in Korea. Th e subjects were asked a range of questions relatedto the degrees of perceived oral malodor and concern for oral h ealth status, as well as their demographic infor-mation and need for oral and dental treatment. Univariate analyses using Chi-square and T-test with a P-valueof .05 were performed using SPSS Version 12.0 for Windows. Results : 1. Male participants reported “moderately concerned for bad breath and smell”and “I don’t care badbreath and smell”39.1% and 26.2% respectively, while more female participants were concerned for oral malodor.“moderately concerned for malodor”and “highly concerned for malodor”41.1% and 28.5%(p<.05). a significant dif-ference among age groups was found. 19% of young adults (less t han or equal to 29 years of age) reported “highlyconcerned for bad breath and smell”while 36.4% of older adults (greater than or equal to 50 years of age) report-ed “highly concerned for bad breath and smell ”(p<.05). 2. 12 non- smoking participants (3.7%) and 15 smokingparticipants (10.8%) reported that they have perceived bad breadth and smell (p<.05). 3. Smoking participantsreported a higher degree of need for oral malodor treatment than that of non-smoking participants 88.5% and82% respectively(p<.05). 4. The participants who did regular toothbrushing more than 3 times a day reported “nomalodor”, 77 % as compared to 66.7% of the participants who did regular toothbrushing 2 times a day. Tooth-brushing 2 times a day reported either “moderate malodor “or “sever malodor”(p<.01). Participants with morefrequent toothbrushing reported less oral and breath odor as compared participants with less frequent tooth-brushing. Conclusions : The study suggested that there is a need to oral prophylaxis for prevention and toothbrushing andtongue cleaning method oral malodor care and oral health status. (J Korean Soc Dent Hygiene 2011;11(6):843-852)Keywords : adult, oral malodor, perceived oral malodor, smoking색인: 구취, 구취인식, 성인, 흡연" @default.
• W812192969 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W812192969 creator A5004665912 @default.
• W812192969 creator A5031143026 @default.
• W812192969 creator A5091243750 @default.
• W812192969 date "2011-12-01" @default.
• W812192969 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W812192969 title "Perceived oral malodor and need for dental care among visitors receiving dental prophylaxis" @default.
• W812192969 cites W1964460611 @default.
• W812192969 cites W2043608084 @default.
• W812192969 cites W2085140182 @default.
• W812192969 cites W2111857893 @default.
• W812192969 cites W2161425691 @default.
• W812192969 cites W2168148550 @default.
• W812192969 cites W2410810112 @default.
• W812192969 cites W2415607985 @default.
• W812192969 cites W2427894781 @default.
• W812192969 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W812192969 type Work @default.
• W812192969 sameAs 812192969 @default.
• W812192969 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W812192969 countsByYear W8121929692013 @default.
• W812192969 countsByYear W8121929692014 @default.
• W812192969 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W812192969 hasAuthorship W812192969A5004665912 @default.
• W812192969 hasAuthorship W812192969A5031143026 @default.
• W812192969 hasAuthorship W812192969A5091243750 @default.
• W812192969 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W812192969 hasConcept C2776693998 @default.
• W812192969 hasConcept C2992672162 @default.
• W812192969 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W812192969 hasConcept C515851188 @default.
• W812192969 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W812192969 hasConceptScore W812192969C199343813 @default.
• W812192969 hasConceptScore W812192969C2776693998 @default.
• W812192969 hasConceptScore W812192969C2992672162 @default.
• W812192969 hasConceptScore W812192969C512399662 @default.
• W812192969 hasConceptScore W812192969C515851188 @default.
• W812192969 hasConceptScore W812192969C71924100 @default.
• W812192969 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W812192969 hasLocation W8121929691 @default.
• W812192969 hasOpenAccess W812192969 @default.
• W812192969 hasPrimaryLocation W8121929691 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W142988649 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W1764148486 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W1983899418 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2000669340 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2026905634 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2028110181 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2048309227 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2151050283 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W218935466 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2261387014 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2315739370 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2440817061 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2479931737 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2599516643 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2770316002 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2771946047 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2895804873 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W2978645826 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W3093084900 @default.
• W812192969 hasRelatedWork W1025025166 @default.
• W812192969 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W812192969 isParatext "false" @default.
• W812192969 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W812192969 magId "812192969" @default.
• W812192969 workType "article" @default.