FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W821778114> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W821778114 endingPage "108" @default.
• W821778114 startingPage "97" @default.
• W821778114 abstract "Ever since the 2000 revision to the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education's (NCATE; 2013b) standards, schools of education have searched for the most productive ways to measure candidates' impact on student learning. This has been no easy task (Hamel & Merz, 2005). Although candidates are often in student teaching experiences for the better part of a year, the ability to measure candidates' impact on student learning is mitigated by the degree to which the cooperating teacher or university supervisor assists the candidates, the length and continuity of instruction that the candidates provide, and the type and number of assessments the candidates may use. These problems are exacerbated by the difficulties in gathering student learning data that are comparable across candidates, programs, and even schools of education. NCATE realized these problems but did not remove the expectation for measuring candidates' impact on student learning. It suggested a cluster of candidate activities that might provide the required evidence. A candidate (a) undertakes a diagnosis (a pretest) or P-12 student learning in some area he or she will teach; (b) plans an appropriate sequence of instruction to advance P-12 student learning and teaches in ways that engage P-12 students, who bring differing background knowledge and learning needs; (c) conducts some concluding assessment (or posttest) that documents that student learning has occurred, or has not; and (d) reflects on changes in teaching that might have improved the results (NCATE, 2013a, Assessment 5). The merger of the Teacher Education Accreditation Council with NCATE into the Council for the Accreditation of Education Preparation (CAEP) included standards that continue the focus on measuring candidates' impact on student learning (Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation, 2013): Impact on P-12 student learning 4.1 The provider documents, using value-added measures where available, other state-supported P-12 impact measures, and any other measures constructed by the provider, that program completers contribute to an expected level of P-12 student growth. No consistent strategies for gathering student learning data have appeared, even though these accreditation standards have existed for some time. The highly promoted Education Teacher Performance Assessment (edTPA) focuses on using student summative assessment for the whole class and for three students in candidates' classrooms to understand the impact of instruction (American Association for Colleges of Teacher Education, 2013). Those data can vary in type and richness, reducing the comparability across candidates or programs; nor are these data measures of student learning gains per se. Value-added measures (VAM) have been added into the accreditation language over recent years. These measures include the analysis of standardized assessments of student learning designed to address differences in classrooms and students to have equitable comparisons of teacher impact. In most cases, VAM would not be possible for candidates to use because of the small amount of time that candidates student-teach by themselves with the curriculum for which the standardized assessment is designed. Louisiana, among other states (Knight et al., 2012), has addressed this problem by applying VAM assessments to the P-12 students of their candidates who have been tracked into their first years of teaching. Regardless of the efficacy of this approach, it does not address the difficulties that schools of education have tracking an individual candidate's impact on student learning while student teaching and tracking the impact of the program on the candidate's progress over the time the candidate is in the unit's program. After an NCATE review in 2007, we began an effort to have candidates report results on P-12 assessments aligned with units of instruction. …" @default.
• W821778114 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W821778114 creator A5007645427 @default.
• W821778114 creator A5037064612 @default.
• W821778114 creator A5052515326 @default.
• W821778114 creator A5088187116 @default.
• W821778114 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W821778114 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W821778114 title "Critics and Critical Analysis: Lessons from 19,000 P-12 Students in Candidates' Classrooms" @default.
• W821778114 cites W1996163463 @default.
• W821778114 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W821778114 type Work @default.
• W821778114 sameAs 821778114 @default.
• W821778114 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W821778114 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W821778114 hasAuthorship W821778114A5007645427 @default.
• W821778114 hasAuthorship W821778114A5037064612 @default.
• W821778114 hasAuthorship W821778114A5052515326 @default.
• W821778114 hasAuthorship W821778114A5088187116 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W821778114 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C120912362 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C145420912 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C15744967 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C17744445 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C19417346 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C199539241 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C509550671 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C61521584 @default.
• W821778114 hasConceptScore W821778114C71924100 @default.
• W821778114 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W821778114 hasLocation W8217781141 @default.
• W821778114 hasOpenAccess W821778114 @default.
• W821778114 hasPrimaryLocation W8217781141 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W1583463069 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2005952645 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2028706797 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2033942011 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W210192860 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2288033604 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2296980913 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2477602804 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2513433873 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2519770424 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2524301420 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2559796844 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2611513828 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2727164571 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2744843130 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W2895833762 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W309308521 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W44072944 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W578859127 @default.
• W821778114 hasRelatedWork W98319780 @default.
• W821778114 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W821778114 isParatext "false" @default.
• W821778114 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W821778114 magId "821778114" @default.
• W821778114 workType "article" @default.