FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W826332541> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W826332541 abstract "FROM CADILLAC TO CHEVY: ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN, COMPROMISE AND THE CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT COMPLETION ACT Adam R. Eastman Department of History Master’s of History For the past century the federal government has been an active partner with state and local agencies to develop water supplies in the arid West. The last of the large-scale federal reclamation projects to be completed is the Central Utah Project or CUP. The CUP has generated considerable controversy throughout its history. The projects opponents have criticized its expense in terms of both dollars and environmental damage while others have worried about its impact on their water rights. Because of its cost and complexity, planning and construction have spanned decades. This has allowed individuals, organizations, and government agencies opportunity to attempt to influence the plans for the project to address their concerns. During six different periods—the initial congressional debate, project planning, the drafting of environmental impact statement in response to the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act, a lawsuit challenging that document, President Jimmy Carter’s reevaluation of the project as a part of the so called “hit list,” local reauthorization of the projects repayment contract—these groups worked to alter the Bureau’s plans to reduce the environmental, social, and fiscal impacts of the project. Despite multiple attempts, they failed to significantly alter the Bureau’s, increase environmental mitigation, or decrease environmental impacts. However, the project’s opponents had been given a seventh opportunity. In the late 1980s, after a half century of planning and more than 20 years of construction—the Bureau knew that it could not finish the project without increasing the congressionally authorized spending limits. At a time of waning federal support for such projects, the Democratic leaders of both the House and Senate committees controlling Bureau projects, Senator Bill Bradley (D-NJ) and Congressman George Miller (D-CA), blocked the bill until the Utah delegation addressed the environmental concerns and objections of the project’s critics. Determined to keep the project alive, Utah’s sole Democrat in Congress, Wayne Owens, acted as a mediator and began to negotiate a compromise. A determined five year effort resulted in a seventy-five page compromise bill that allowed the project to move forward while addressing the major concerns of the project’s opponents. Congress passed the Central Utah Project Completion Act in October 1992. The Completion Act cut some of the projects irrigation features, increased the amount of local cost share, shifted planning and oversight for the remaining features from the Bureau to the local" @default.
• W826332541 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W826332541 creator A5070853417 @default.
• W826332541 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W826332541 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W826332541 title "From Cadillac to Chevy: Environmental Concern, Compromise and the Central Utah Project Completion Act" @default.
• W826332541 cites W1492603394 @default.
• W826332541 cites W1963592392 @default.
• W826332541 cites W1973887892 @default.
• W826332541 cites W1977382245 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2009826065 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2012334720 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2018096586 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2037162630 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2038886309 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2049324892 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2061791679 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2104246777 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2136757069 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2266102266 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2292953615 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2317700092 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2333607991 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2334157684 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2359495635 @default.
• W826332541 cites W2562406169 @default.
• W826332541 cites W271239854 @default.
• W826332541 cites W3113044865 @default.
• W826332541 cites W3173007979 @default.
• W826332541 cites W32477790 @default.
• W826332541 cites W327648029 @default.
• W826332541 cites W613974027 @default.
• W826332541 cites W621071952 @default.
• W826332541 cites W622221667 @default.
• W826332541 cites W642503289 @default.
• W826332541 cites W651378160 @default.
• W826332541 cites W656912061 @default.
• W826332541 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W826332541 type Work @default.
• W826332541 sameAs 826332541 @default.
• W826332541 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W826332541 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W826332541 hasAuthorship W826332541A5070853417 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C164749845 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C20256287 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C2777134139 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C2777240189 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C46355384 @default.
• W826332541 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C138885662 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C164749845 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C17744445 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C199539241 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C20256287 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C205649164 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C2777134139 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C2777240189 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C2778137410 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C3116431 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C41895202 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C46355384 @default.
• W826332541 hasConceptScore W826332541C91375879 @default.
• W826332541 hasLocation W8263325411 @default.
• W826332541 hasOpenAccess W826332541 @default.
• W826332541 hasPrimaryLocation W8263325411 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W1586358168 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W1593341837 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W19051945 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W1964120546 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W1969863469 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2032888981 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2081794111 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2120874607 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2181398329 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2281298006 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2313747914 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2524573357 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2560797206 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2580265344 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2599329420 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2599711106 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2610287498 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W2907841086 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W3121700700 @default.
• W826332541 hasRelatedWork W3145973832 @default.
• W826332541 isParatext "false" @default.
• W826332541 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W826332541 magId "826332541" @default.
• W826332541 workType "article" @default.