FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W82848830> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W82848830 abstract "What is the designer’s role in negotiating wellbeing of all involved in the fashion process? How does the design process relate to wellbeing? Considering the makers, wearers and the subsequent individuals and communities affected by the product or concept being designed, what can a designer do to observe and consider human fulfilment in the design process?Threads from Lecture 1 of the Better Lives series were drawn together before introducing Dilys Williams, designer and director of LCF’s Centre for Sustainable Fashion, and psychologist Professor Peter Ayton from City University to discuss how judgement and well-being impact our experiences.Better Lives lecture series 2013: an Exploration through Fashion and PsychologyThe Better Lives lecture series returns for the third time to continue to explore the underpinning ethos of London College of Fashion. This series offers a perspective on Better Lives that breaks new ground. Through the recent appointment of psychologist Dr Carolyn Mair, the College is able to explore the reciprocal relationship between fashion and psychology for the first time.Taking an interdisciplinary approach, this lecture series allows fashion and psychology to come together through a series of discussions to reflect on human fulfilment and ecological prosperity.The Better Lives Lecture Series is guided through the Centre for Sustainable Fashion, a testbed for generating new ideas and knowledge with ecological thriving and human fulfilment at its core.‘Any and all voluntary behaviour, implicitly or explicitly requires judgement. Judgement refers to discernment: the mental ability to perceive and distinguish relationships. Traditionally, models of judgement were based on rationality and optimality rules such as expected utility theory. However more recently, research has shown that humans do not conform to these rules. For example, we are constrained by the limits of our information processing capacities and we exhibit different, often poor, assessment of risk, reward and probability. The latter may be due to cognitive overload, physical and emotional constraints or sensory manipulation. It is clear that outcomes of our judgements impact on our wellbeing, how we feel and function on personal and social levels, thus, the two are inextricably intertwined. ‘ Dr Carolyn MairAlthough the internal mental processes of judgement and wellbeing have been widely studied by cognitive psychologists, there exists sparse research on how these explicitly relate to and interact with fashion. In the Better Lives lecture series 2013, psychologists and fashion practitioners discuss how the internal processes involved in making judgements impact on and are impacted by fashion and how the interrelationships between these effect and are affected by subjective assessments of human fulfilment." @default.
• W82848830 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W82848830 creator A5027875407 @default.
• W82848830 creator A5088918752 @default.
• W82848830 date "2013-05-29" @default.
• W82848830 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W82848830 title "Experiencing Fashion - Better Lives Lecture Series" @default.
• W82848830 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W82848830 type Work @default.
• W82848830 sameAs 82848830 @default.
• W82848830 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W82848830 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W82848830 hasAuthorship W82848830A5027875407 @default.
• W82848830 hasAuthorship W82848830A5088918752 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C162130032 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C2776548248 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C2776745293 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C2780871342 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W82848830 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C111472728 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C127413603 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C138885662 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C144024400 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C147176958 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C15744967 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C162130032 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C2776548248 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C2776745293 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C2780871342 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C36289849 @default.
• W82848830 hasConceptScore W82848830C77805123 @default.
• W82848830 hasLocation W828488301 @default.
• W82848830 hasOpenAccess W82848830 @default.
• W82848830 hasPrimaryLocation W828488301 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W140537791 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W1490082490 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W1577756688 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W1781728401 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W1975426043 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2170968664 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2246001919 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2464553309 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2475056568 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2536254375 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2567144260 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2587228686 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2886555694 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2951016759 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W3095509307 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W3210980560 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W321553907 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W567312740 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W586105151 @default.
• W82848830 hasRelatedWork W2186030625 @default.
• W82848830 isParatext "false" @default.
• W82848830 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W82848830 magId "82848830" @default.
• W82848830 workType "article" @default.