FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W830302930> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W830302930 endingPage "1928" @default.
• W830302930 startingPage "1927" @default.
• W830302930 abstract "Special attention has recently been paid to methods for controlling the nanospheres' size and distribution, because they exhibit peculiar and desirable properties in the wafer polishing process. Monodisperse silica nanospheres were first synthesized by Stober et al. using the sol-gel method, which induces high purity in the resulting particles. Bogush and Zukoski reported the influence of reaction parameters such as ammonia and water contents on the particles' size and distribution. They observed that, for a particular concentration of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) with ethanol as solvent, particle size reaches a maximum and then decreases as both ammonia and water concentrations are increased. Similar behavior was observed for all the TEOS concentrations studied, and the maximum particle size moved to higher ammonia and water concentrations as the TEOS concentration was increased. The maximum monodisperse size achievable by this process was found to be 800 nm. While narrow size distributions were achievable by this process, the solid content of the resulting dispersion was less than 2 wt.%. Attempts to increase solid content by simply increasing the initial TEOS concentration for a particular concentration of ammonia and water resulted in larger particle sizes and broader size distributions. Recently, silica nanospheres have been considered effective candidates for chemical-mechanical polishing materials, so several investigators have reported ways to control particle size by using reactor type and varying the concentrations of ammonia, water, and alcohol solvent. Kim et al. found that the effect of the parameters on the particle size of silica nanospheres was increased in the following order: reaction temperature, [H2O/TEOS] ratio, concentration of ammonia, and feed rate of reactant. They also examined the influence of reaction method (such as semi-batch reaction and batch reaction) on particle size and distribution. A relatively slow rate of hydrolysis of the TEOS occurred during the semibatch process, which resulted in larger silica particles and a narrower size distribution. Even though several studies detail how various controlling factors affect the size and distribution of silica nanospheres, there are no systematic reports about the effect of silicon alkoxides and solvent types on nanosphere formation. In this study, we have synthesized silica nanospheres using four different silicon alkoxides (tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS), tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) tetrapropylorthosilicate (TPOS), tetrambutylorthosilicate (TBOS)) and solvents (methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), propanol (PrOH), butanol (BuOH)) and characterized the nanospheres’ sizes and shapes by FESEM. This experiment used two types of solutions: a solution “A” of silicon alkoxide in alcohol solvent and a solution “B” of ammonium hydroxide and water in alcohol. “B” was added to “A” and stirred for 3 h at room temperature. The resulting powders were obtained by centrifugation and dried at 80 °C for 12 h. The particle shape and size in this study were determined by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JEOL JSM-6700F). Table 1 summarizes the effects of using various silicon alkoxides (TMOS, TEOS, TPOS, and TBOS) on nanosphere shapes and sizes; images are shown in Figure 1. The silica nanoparticles were synthesized using 0.5 M silicon alkoxide, 6 M H2O, 0.7 M NH4OH, and 10 mL propanol at room temperature. The particles had round shapes, except those prepared by TMOS, which had irregular shapes and a broad size distribution. TMOS was thus shown to be an inadequate precursor for synthesis of silica nanospheres. Nanoparticles produced by other alkoxides, whose sizes range from 260 mm to 380 nm, exhibit round shapes and a narrow size distribution. The maximum mean particle size of 380 nm was observed when using TEOS (Figure 1(b)). As the length of the carbon chain increased from TEOS to TBOS, the particle sizes gradually decreased. This phenomenon might be explained by steric effect of silicon alkoxide on hydrolytic stability. Aelion et al. reported hydrolysis rate quickly reduced as increasing carbon chain of the silicon alkoxide. The effects of various alcohols as solvents on silica particle size and distribution are shown in Figure 2. TPOS" @default.
• W830302930 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W830302930 creator A5050557263 @default.
• W830302930 creator A5073384154 @default.
• W830302930 creator A5090320264 @default.
• W830302930 date "2005-12-20" @default.
• W830302930 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W830302930 title "Preparation of Silica Nanospheres: Effect of Silicon Alkoxide and Alcohol on Silica Nanospheres" @default.
• W830302930 cites W200569257 @default.
• W830302930 cites W2033261231 @default.
• W830302930 cites W2053456047 @default.
• W830302930 cites W2053726199 @default.
• W830302930 cites W2062489116 @default.
• W830302930 cites W2089124524 @default.
• W830302930 cites W2092522437 @default.
• W830302930 doi "https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2005.26.12.1927" @default.
• W830302930 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W830302930 type Work @default.
• W830302930 sameAs 830302930 @default.
• W830302930 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302012 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302013 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302015 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302016 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302017 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302019 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302020 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302021 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302022 @default.
• W830302930 countsByYear W8303029302023 @default.
• W830302930 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W830302930 hasAuthorship W830302930A5050557263 @default.
• W830302930 hasAuthorship W830302930A5073384154 @default.
• W830302930 hasAuthorship W830302930A5090320264 @default.
• W830302930 hasBestOaLocation W8303029301 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C161790260 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C171250308 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C2778839380 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C2781066024 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C42360764 @default.
• W830302930 hasConcept C544956773 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C127413603 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C161790260 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C171250308 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C178790620 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C185592680 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C192562407 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C2778839380 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C2781066024 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C42360764 @default.
• W830302930 hasConceptScore W830302930C544956773 @default.
• W830302930 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W830302930 hasLocation W8303029301 @default.
• W830302930 hasOpenAccess W830302930 @default.
• W830302930 hasPrimaryLocation W8303029301 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W1977776667 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2093811404 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2312552982 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2328921792 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2598954267 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2625016930 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2950823159 @default.
• W830302930 hasRelatedWork W2969194435 @default.
• W830302930 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W830302930 isParatext "false" @default.
• W830302930 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W830302930 magId "830302930" @default.
• W830302930 workType "article" @default.