FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W830542525> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W830542525 endingPage "32" @default.
• W830542525 startingPage "15" @default.
• W830542525 abstract "This paper draws upon the broad range of research conducted on corporate governance and narrows the focus to a new model for governance that places culture as the focal point. The purpose of the research is to analyse the influence of culture on the creation of value added boards, the role of the Chairperson and directors in the development of board culture and how culture impacts the effectiveness and efficiency of the board. The paper draws together good practice as distilled from the interviews and is grounded in the &apos;Value-Added Board&apos; model. This model takes a holistic view of governance, and focuses on the dynamics of the board&apos;s culture. The model focuses on how the board organizes its activities, what activities are valued, how information is evaluated, and how decisions are formed. The model also addresses how the board keeps itself fresh and competent by evaluating itself through continuous improvement. This paper reviews the background literature on board culture pinning the creation of the model, and assesses why culture is critical in the evaluation of board performance. The ethnographic approach to the interviews included one on one taped interviews with directors and taped board meetings where the interaction and decision making process could be directly observed. For this paper two boards have been selected that had substantially different board cultures. Past research has been unable to establish an unequivocal relationship between good corporate governance and firm performance. The evidence is either non-existent, mixed, or weak for such a relationship, and there is no evidence of causality. There is nothing that indicates that if companies follow some set of corporate governance practices that shareholders and stakeholders will benefit in some manner. A key question is why after thousands of research hours and numerous papers has no strong and definitive relationship been found? To date, the methodologies used to study this issue are primarily positional in nature and based on quantitative variables. Researchers take board structure or governance variables and develop numeric scores, ratings, or rankings of the data. These data are then regressed against financial, market return, or valuation variables to see if a relationship exists. This work converts primarily qualitative data into quantitative data. That is a problem when the research question is qualitative in nature. The problem may be that there is a relationship between governance and the financial and market performance of the company, but the methodologies used to detect it have not been successful. The methodology used in this study is qualitative in nature and is consistent with the qualitative nature of the data and consequently provides a robust approach to analysing this phenomena. Ethnographic research has had limited exposure in the board room mostly due to access issues with corporate directors and a tendency for researchers to still over focus on quantitative data collection. This paper provides a unique view of culture from within the boardroom and offers an alternative to the corporate scorecards developed from past research studies. (original abstract)" @default.
• W830542525 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W830542525 creator A5035627179 @default.
• W830542525 date "2010-06-30" @default.
• W830542525 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W830542525 title "Corporate governance culture - an interview-based ethnography of two boards of directors using grounded theory" @default.
• W830542525 cites W122259730 @default.
• W830542525 cites W1566344170 @default.
• W830542525 cites W1586118793 @default.
• W830542525 cites W1608170983 @default.
• W830542525 cites W1658908529 @default.
• W830542525 cites W180224939 @default.
• W830542525 cites W1964018606 @default.
• W830542525 cites W1969199526 @default.
• W830542525 cites W1999422153 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2003269093 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2005862514 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2007260772 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2015930340 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2017637335 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2018863071 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2026858594 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2029763957 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2033690556 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2034347336 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2042196381 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2045427766 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2047861581 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2051214450 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2066439416 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2076975100 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2082372859 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2085864469 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2095698443 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2102417171 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2107323772 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2108258658 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2112208808 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2117465094 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2135145155 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2146709349 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2150098075 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2152544245 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2162448899 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2329395632 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2486330191 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2752617332 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3121131820 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3121693921 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3121936164 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3122135684 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3122859634 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3122966732 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3123978978 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3125898175 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3214833809 @default.
• W830542525 cites W588208920 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2116300149 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2135806375 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2161878454 @default.
• W830542525 cites W2338071896 @default.
• W830542525 cites W3122483415 @default.
• W830542525 doi "https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2010.2.877" @default.
• W830542525 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W830542525 type Work @default.
• W830542525 sameAs 830542525 @default.
• W830542525 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W830542525 countsByYear W8305425252012 @default.
• W830542525 countsByYear W8305425252013 @default.
• W830542525 countsByYear W8305425252014 @default.
• W830542525 countsByYear W8305425252021 @default.
• W830542525 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W830542525 hasAuthorship W830542525A5035627179 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C156325361 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C179454799 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C67674302 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W830542525 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W830542525 hasConceptScore W830542525C111919701 @default.
• W830542525 hasConceptScore W830542525C119857082 @default.
• W830542525 hasConceptScore W830542525C121955636 @default.

• next