FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W838205657> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W838205657 endingPage "126" @default.
• W838205657 startingPage "104" @default.
• W838205657 abstract "RESUMO A obra Leviathan , de Thomas Hobbes, e geralmente apresentada como um marco secularizante do pensamento politico moderno. Por conta disso, muitos estudos sobre esta obra tem sido produzidos com um vies marcadamente iluminista-contratualista. Diferentemente de tal tendencia, este artigo pretende analisar a dimensao teologico-politica dessa obra, com foco na correlacao tematica entre soberania, fe e obediencia civil. Este artigo esta dividido em tres partes: na primeira, procuramos situar o leitor brasileiro nos debates revisionistas e pos-revisionistas sobre as Guerras Civis Inglesas e a Historia das Reformas Protestantes na Inglaterra; na segunda, procuramos demonstrar o que entendemos ser o fim teologico-politico principal de sua obra, isto e, que nao ha contradicao entre fe e obediencia civil num estado cristao , se a religiao deste estado for devidamente fundamentada nas Escrituras; na terceira, procuramos demonstrar que a Infalibilidade da Biblia e um tema estruturante para a defesa da soberania do estado protestante na Inglaterra do seculo XVII. Portanto, este artigo colabora com a linhagem critica que analisa a dimensao teologica da obra Leviathan . Palavras-chave : Leviathan . Thomas Hobbes. Soberania. Religiao. Guerra Civil. ABSTRACT The Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan is currently presented as a main reference of the secularized political thought rising from Early Modern Europe. Such a scholar approach to Leviathan has been followed the Enlightenment one. However, this article intends to analyze the theological political dimension of the major Hobbes’ work, relating the themes of Sovereignty, Faith and Civil Obedience. This article is divided in three parts: firstly, we intend to introduce the Brazilian scholar to revisionist and post-revisionist approaches on the studies of English Civil Wars and English Reformations; secondly, we intend to show that the Leviathan’s main theological political aim is to demonstrate that there is no contradiction in the Christian State between faith and civil obedience , if the Christian religion is rightly fashioned from the Bible; thirdly, we intend to demonstrate that the Biblical Infallibility is an important theme to Hobbes defense of sovereignty in the 17 th Century English Protestant State. Therefore, this article collaborates to the critical trends in the studies of the theological dimension of Leviathan . Keywords : Leviathan . Thomas Hobbes. Sovereignty. Religion. Civil War." @default.
• W838205657 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W838205657 creator A5030289028 @default.
• W838205657 creator A5084452001 @default.
• W838205657 date "2015-07-01" @default.
• W838205657 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W838205657 title "Leviathan: Soberania, Religião E Guerra Civil" @default.
• W838205657 cites W1495693501 @default.
• W838205657 cites W1883401237 @default.
• W838205657 cites W1976833513 @default.
• W838205657 cites W1997784421 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2001390539 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2002365166 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2009854318 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2025465812 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2055478738 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2068797373 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2100934356 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2112365256 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2138417583 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2328122046 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2335762313 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2487301341 @default.
• W838205657 cites W2498823570 @default.
• W838205657 cites W3022811927 @default.
• W838205657 cites W3134416888 @default.
• W838205657 cites W391792953 @default.
• W838205657 cites W652610628 @default.
• W838205657 cites W869283067 @default.
• W838205657 doi "https://doi.org/10.12819/2015.12.4.7" @default.
• W838205657 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W838205657 type Work @default.
• W838205657 sameAs 838205657 @default.
• W838205657 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W838205657 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W838205657 hasAuthorship W838205657A5030289028 @default.
• W838205657 hasAuthorship W838205657A5084452001 @default.
• W838205657 hasBestOaLocation W8382056572 @default.
• W838205657 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W838205657 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W838205657 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W838205657 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W838205657 hasConcept C2778049125 @default.
• W838205657 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W838205657 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W838205657 hasConcept C81631423 @default.
• W838205657 hasConceptScore W838205657C142362112 @default.
• W838205657 hasConceptScore W838205657C15708023 @default.
• W838205657 hasConceptScore W838205657C17744445 @default.
• W838205657 hasConceptScore W838205657C199539241 @default.
• W838205657 hasConceptScore W838205657C2778049125 @default.
• W838205657 hasConceptScore W838205657C38652104 @default.
• W838205657 hasConceptScore W838205657C41008148 @default.
• W838205657 hasConceptScore W838205657C81631423 @default.
• W838205657 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W838205657 hasLocation W8382056571 @default.
• W838205657 hasLocation W8382056572 @default.
• W838205657 hasOpenAccess W838205657 @default.
• W838205657 hasPrimaryLocation W8382056571 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W1557907936 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W2111865594 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W2123836397 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W2248387313 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W3006587989 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W3120330463 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W3203105381 @default.
• W838205657 hasRelatedWork W1832118649 @default.
• W838205657 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W838205657 isParatext "false" @default.
• W838205657 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W838205657 magId "838205657" @default.
• W838205657 workType "article" @default.