FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W84304292> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W84304292 startingPage "61" @default.
• W84304292 abstract "AbstractThe current study tested effectiveness of a computer-supported collaborative learning tool-HyLighter-on undergraduate students' learning, affect for learning, and complex cognitive skills. The HyLighter group (N = 23) (1) digitally highlighted and annotated a reading article, and (2) reviewed and expanded on peers' and instructor's highlights and annotations. The control group (N=27) read article in hard copy without using HyLighter and practicing its learning activities. The dependent variables included: (a) performance on a reading quiz, (b) a number of affective variables related to reading assignment, and (3) students' cognitive modeling of article's content. Although students reported high rates of satisfaction with HyLighter tool, performance on reading comprehension quiz did not differ significantly between two groups. Students using HyLighter tended to score higher on both positive-valence and negative-valence emotions. However, these students also showed significant and substantial superiority in mental model similarity indices. Thus, HyLigher use in learning process was apparent in learners' content-conceptualization more so than in quiz performances. These findings have significant implications for both instructional and research purposes.Keywordssocial annotation, distance education, computer-supported collaborative learning, complex thinking skills, HIMATT, HyLigther, text summaries, reference modelsIntroductionCollaborative learning is characterized by groups of learners actively communicating and interacting with each other to set up a shared focus aimed at reaching a common goal (Akkerman et al., 2007; Beers, Boshuizen, Kirschner, & Gijselaers, 2006). In fact, the widespread and increasing use of collaborative learning has been a success story (Johnson & Johnson, 2009, p. 365). Amongst most important characteristics of collaborative learning are following: (1) positive mutual dependence where learners depend on each other to complete a shared task, (2) individual accountability where each learner in group shares responsibility for end result, and (3) social skills where members develop social skills to work together successfully (see van der Meijden, 2007). The success of collaborative learning can be attributed to its allowing increased active engagement in learning process and longer retention of learned material (Morgan, Whorton, & Gunsalus, 2000), improving students' complex thinking skills (Sloffer, Dueber, & Duffy, 1999), and overall enabling more self- regulation in students (Van Boxtel, Van der Linden, & Kanselaar, 2000). Several concepts inherent in different disciplines can help at least partially explain why students, given right circumstances, learn more optimally from actively communicating with one another.According to classical cognitive developmental perspective, collaborative learning works efficiently because it promotes learning within a zone of proximal development (see Vygotsky, 1978). Hence, scaffolding of learning material by more capable learner transfers to less capable learner. Moreover, collaborative learning works because it supports development of new cognitive schemas (Fawcett & Garton, 2005); hence, more advanced representations are formed and implemented by learner. Finally, collaborative learning works because it creates social cohesion resulting in group members' desire to help each other in learning task (see Janssen, Kirschner, Erkens, Kirschner, & Paas, 2010). This said, collaborative learning environments may differ in size, group characteristics, learning focus, learning goals, and supportive technologies (Kirschner, Paas, & Kirschner, 2009).Within technologically supported learning environments, computer-supported collaborative learning draws ample research (Gress, Fior, Hadwin, & Winne, 2008). …" @default.
• W84304292 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W84304292 creator A5015477937 @default.
• W84304292 creator A5026943714 @default.
• W84304292 creator A5033970369 @default.
• W84304292 creator A5046290848 @default.
• W84304292 creator A5088380988 @default.
• W84304292 date "2012-04-01" @default.
• W84304292 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W84304292 title "Evaluation of a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Tool: Effects on Quiz Performance, Content-Conceptualization, Affect, and Motivation" @default.
• W84304292 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W84304292 type Work @default.
• W84304292 sameAs 84304292 @default.
• W84304292 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W84304292 countsByYear W843042922016 @default.
• W84304292 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W84304292 hasAuthorship W84304292A5015477937 @default.
• W84304292 hasAuthorship W84304292A5026943714 @default.
• W84304292 hasAuthorship W84304292A5033970369 @default.
• W84304292 hasAuthorship W84304292A5046290848 @default.
• W84304292 hasAuthorship W84304292A5088380988 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C138020889 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C168900304 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W84304292 hasConcept C90734943 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C121332964 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C138020889 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C145420912 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C154945302 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C15744967 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C168900304 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C169760540 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C169900460 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C2776035688 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C41008148 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C46312422 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C62520636 @default.
• W84304292 hasConceptScore W84304292C90734943 @default.
• W84304292 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W84304292 hasLocation W843042921 @default.
• W84304292 hasOpenAccess W84304292 @default.
• W84304292 hasPrimaryLocation W843042921 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W1491151700 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W1591726197 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W1692693661 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W1976274459 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2016551704 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2023974948 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2138170171 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2167607107 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2230440793 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2246624828 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2277151670 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2548420431 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2565429929 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2587086422 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2785131372 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2790829756 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2950241556 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W3016793344 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W71791505 @default.
• W84304292 hasRelatedWork W2187128975 @default.
• W84304292 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W84304292 isParatext "false" @default.
• W84304292 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W84304292 magId "84304292" @default.
• W84304292 workType "article" @default.