Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W84456043> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W84456043 endingPage "231" @default.
- W84456043 startingPage "225" @default.
- W84456043 abstract "Background Promotional offers on cigarettes (e.g., dollar-off, multipack discounts) composed the largest share of tobacco industry marketing expenditures, totaling $8.9 billion, or 72% of the total budget in 2002. Internal industry documents indicate that young adults, potential quitters, and other price-sensitive groups are the targets of these marketing tactics. How effective they are in actually reaching these groups in the general population of smokers has not yet been investigated. Methods Data were from 4618 current smokers responding to the large, random-digit-dialed population-based 2002 California Tobacco Survey. The characteristics were identified of smokers who reported that they used these offers “every time I see one.” Results Thirty-five percent of smokers used promotional offers every time they saw one. Multivariate analyses identified young adults, women, African Americans, those with higher daily cigarette consumption, and those worried about cigarette costs as more likely to use promotional offers at every opportunity. Smokers most committed to quitting were no more likely to use promotional offers than those with no intention to quit. Cigarette brand was highly correlated with age and race/ethnicity, and therefore was not included in the multivariate analysis. Those who smoked menthol cigarettes and Camels, more often young adults and African Americans, were much more likely than those of other brands to use promotional offers. Conclusions With the exception of smokers intending to quit, cigarette promotional offers are effectively reaching most industry-targeted groups. Importantly, young adults, who have the greatest long-term customer potential, are responding. Promotional offers on cigarettes (e.g., dollar-off, multipack discounts) composed the largest share of tobacco industry marketing expenditures, totaling $8.9 billion, or 72% of the total budget in 2002. Internal industry documents indicate that young adults, potential quitters, and other price-sensitive groups are the targets of these marketing tactics. How effective they are in actually reaching these groups in the general population of smokers has not yet been investigated. Data were from 4618 current smokers responding to the large, random-digit-dialed population-based 2002 California Tobacco Survey. The characteristics were identified of smokers who reported that they used these offers “every time I see one.” Thirty-five percent of smokers used promotional offers every time they saw one. Multivariate analyses identified young adults, women, African Americans, those with higher daily cigarette consumption, and those worried about cigarette costs as more likely to use promotional offers at every opportunity. Smokers most committed to quitting were no more likely to use promotional offers than those with no intention to quit. Cigarette brand was highly correlated with age and race/ethnicity, and therefore was not included in the multivariate analysis. Those who smoked menthol cigarettes and Camels, more often young adults and African Americans, were much more likely than those of other brands to use promotional offers. With the exception of smokers intending to quit, cigarette promotional offers are effectively reaching most industry-targeted groups. Importantly, young adults, who have the greatest long-term customer potential, are responding." @default.
- W84456043 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W84456043 creator A5017125735 @default.
- W84456043 creator A5019835987 @default.
- W84456043 creator A5025856871 @default.
- W84456043 creator A5050706068 @default.
- W84456043 creator A5076229536 @default.
- W84456043 date "2006-03-01" @default.
- W84456043 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
- W84456043 title "Cigarette Promotional OffersWho Takes Advantage?" @default.
- W84456043 cites W1559794282 @default.
- W84456043 cites W1562891728 @default.
- W84456043 cites W1985146943 @default.
- W84456043 cites W1989869147 @default.
- W84456043 cites W1992175073 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2009395158 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2017768073 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2022781243 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2039666966 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2043272485 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2056096497 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2087252679 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2098628200 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2104744965 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2124181495 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2126483194 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2149654763 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2152977422 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2171472183 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2474554719 @default.
- W84456043 cites W3026721701 @default.
- W84456043 cites W2308064644 @default.
- W84456043 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.11.001" @default.
- W84456043 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16476638" @default.
- W84456043 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W84456043 type Work @default.
- W84456043 sameAs 84456043 @default.
- W84456043 citedByCount "57" @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432012 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432013 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432014 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432015 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432016 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432017 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432018 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432019 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432021 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432022 @default.
- W84456043 countsByYear W844560432023 @default.
- W84456043 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W84456043 hasAuthorship W84456043A5017125735 @default.
- W84456043 hasAuthorship W84456043A5019835987 @default.
- W84456043 hasAuthorship W84456043A5025856871 @default.
- W84456043 hasAuthorship W84456043A5050706068 @default.
- W84456043 hasAuthorship W84456043A5076229536 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C109168655 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C137403100 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C205545832 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C2777754422 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C2780194911 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C2781145028 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C30772137 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
- W84456043 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C10138342 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C109168655 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C112698675 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C126322002 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C137403100 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C142724271 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C144024400 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C144133560 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C149923435 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C15744967 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C162853370 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C17744445 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C178790620 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C185592680 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C199539241 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C205545832 @default.
- W84456043 hasConceptScore W84456043C2777754422 @default.