FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W845689159> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W845689159 endingPage "55" @default.
• W845689159 startingPage "38" @default.
• W845689159 abstract "Kant is famous for undertaking a critique of reason and for calling two of his most significant works critiques of reason . These titles raise suspicions. Does Kant genuinely criticise reason, thereby calling into question the very processes by which any reasoned thought or action – including any criticism of reason – should be conducted? Or does he give these pretentious titles to works that deploy rather than criticise reason? Indeed, could anything really, seriously count either as a critique of reason or as a vindication of reason? Isn't the very idea that we could show that certain ways of thinking or acting are reasoned or reasonable absurd? After all, the demonstration must either build on assumptions that lack reasoned vindication, or be supported by arguments that deploy the very conception of reason supposedly vindicated. So it will be either unreasoned or circular: either way it will fail to vindicate reason. We have grounds for suspecting that no ways of organising thinking or acting have unconditional authority, and that Kant cannot have vindicated reason. Kant's attempt to give an account of practical reason that offers unconditional reasons for action and provides the basis for a reasoned account of human duties is spectacularly ambitious: even if it fails in some ways it is worth the closest attention. Here I aim to give as coherent account of that attempt as I can offer, although I shall say nothing about the connections Kant draws between practical and theoretical reason. Since practical reasoning aims to shape and select action, I begin with a short account of Kant's views on action. Practical reasoning and the agent perspective Agents use practical reasoning to shape or guide their future action. Since practical reason has to bear on action yet to be done, it cannot bear on act tokens : there are no relevant, individuable act tokens at the time that practical reasoning takes place. So practical reasoning has to bear on act types (including types of attitude ). It might be used to provide reasons for thinking that certain types of action or attitude are required or forbidden, recommended or inadvisable. As Kant sees it, types of action are specified by act descriptions, while normative claims are expressed in principles that incorporate act descriptions." @default.
• W845689159 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W845689159 creator A5050865978 @default.
• W845689159 date "2015-12-18" @default.
• W845689159 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W845689159 title "Kant: rationality as practical reason" @default.
• W845689159 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316337141.004" @default.
• W845689159 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W845689159 type Work @default.
• W845689159 sameAs 845689159 @default.
• W845689159 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W845689159 countsByYear W8456891592012 @default.
• W845689159 countsByYear W8456891592018 @default.
• W845689159 countsByYear W8456891592019 @default.
• W845689159 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W845689159 hasAuthorship W845689159A5050865978 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C136815107 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C192906763 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C201717286 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W845689159 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C111472728 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C121332964 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C136815107 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C138885662 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C17744445 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C192906763 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C199539241 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C201717286 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C2780791683 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C62520636 @default.
• W845689159 hasConceptScore W845689159C7991579 @default.
• W845689159 hasLocation W8456891591 @default.
• W845689159 hasOpenAccess W845689159 @default.
• W845689159 hasPrimaryLocation W8456891591 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W126499118 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W1508742797 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W157645907 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W176265534 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W194886366 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2045067842 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2100600016 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2158335579 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W229215015 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2325197755 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2332280881 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2332376285 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2491471450 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2494685314 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W266034121 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2765679337 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2788090771 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W2903301962 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W31663719 @default.
• W845689159 hasRelatedWork W948635048 @default.
• W845689159 isParatext "false" @default.
• W845689159 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W845689159 magId "845689159" @default.
• W845689159 workType "book-chapter" @default.