Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W858326892> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W858326892 endingPage "27" @default.
- W858326892 startingPage "15" @default.
- W858326892 abstract "AbstractThe objective of this exploratory study was to describe patterns in self-regulated learning (SRL) for both high school students and college freshmen while engaged in a design activity. The main research question guiding this study was: How did high school and first-year college students self-regulate their approaches to learning when engaged in an engineering design project? Specific focus was given by exploring how these two groups of students engaged in (1) task interpretation in relation to reported strategy use during the design process; and (2) task interpretation in relation to reported strategy use in project management.Students at one high school in the state of Colorado and first year undergraduate engineering students at one public university in the state of Utah participated in this study. High school students worked in an Architectural and Robotics Design classes (n=27). College freshmen worked in a mechanical engineering solid modeling course (n=70). A survey instrument and Web-based design journal entries were administered at early and later stages of the project to capture students' SRL, including task interpretation (TI) and reported use of planning (PS), cognitive (CS), and monitoring/fix-up (MF) strategies. Descriptive statistics, non-parametric statistics, and graphical views were used to analyze survey responses. Entries from students' design journals were segmented and coded using an SRL model and interpreted to triangulate and complement survey data to achieve better insight about the employed strategies of these two groups.Not surprisingly, findings suggested that, for the most part, first-year college students scored higher than high school students on task interpretation and reported use of planning, cognitive, and monitoring/fix-up strategies. Journal entries also revealed that college freshmen were more thorough in identifying and describing design strategies for their projects than were their high school student counterparts. Most importantly, differences in the quality of SRL were observed within each group, suggesting that students at both educational levels varied in their self-regulated performance. Further, while students in both groups had relatively good awareness of task demands, they were less aware of how to translate that task understanding into proper plans and plan execution across the design process and project management. This article discusses potential implications for design instruction for both groups of students.Keywords: Engineering Design, Grades 9-12, College freshman, Metacognition, Self-regulated learning1. IntroductionTremendous efforts have been devoted to improving student learning in high school pre-engineering and college engineering courses. One of the critical needs for advancing student learning in these contexts, as highlighted by Bransford and his colleagues in their book, How People Learn, is to investigate learning process from a metacognitive perspective (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). According to Zimmerman (1989), metacognition is heavily implicated in self-regulated learning (SRL) which plays a significant role in learning and is an important predictor of academic performance. Models of self-regulation typically describe how metacognitive knowledge (e.g., about tasks, learning, strategies) and metacognitive skills (Le., self-regulating strategies used in the deliberate management of learning) interweave in the context of authentic activity (e.g., see Butler & Cartier, 2004; Cartier & Butler, 2004).With design as a core activity in engineering, design projects have been recognized as an effective activity to support learning in science, technology and mathematics (Sanders & Wells, 2010; Schaefer, Sullivan, & Yowell, 2003). Therefore, for that specific context, design has been identified as a catalyst in STEM education. Design tasks are often constructed to involve the solving of an in ill-structured problem, which reguires a high level of SRL strategies use. …" @default.
- W858326892 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W858326892 creator A5007029101 @default.
- W858326892 creator A5027487521 @default.
- W858326892 creator A5040335590 @default.
- W858326892 creator A5054436408 @default.
- W858326892 creator A5069756984 @default.
- W858326892 creator A5087325228 @default.
- W858326892 creator A5090687734 @default.
- W858326892 date "2013-10-01" @default.
- W858326892 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W858326892 title "Pattern of Task Interpretation and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies of High School Students and College Freshmen during an Engineering Design Project." @default.
- W858326892 cites W145939632 @default.
- W858326892 cites W1492093511 @default.
- W858326892 cites W1510086110 @default.
- W858326892 cites W1510494650 @default.
- W858326892 cites W1603194864 @default.
- W858326892 cites W1971244986 @default.
- W858326892 cites W1982434764 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2006091010 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2010546825 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2023163290 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2066379034 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2072464304 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2085020917 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2086921456 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2093950336 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2095907159 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2108034996 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2109654065 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2117215437 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2127997659 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2148117181 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2494899296 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2503983188 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2565560333 @default.
- W858326892 cites W2727426218 @default.
- W858326892 cites W48809960 @default.
- W858326892 cites W578996322 @default.
- W858326892 cites W91408206 @default.
- W858326892 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W858326892 type Work @default.
- W858326892 sameAs 858326892 @default.
- W858326892 citedByCount "6" @default.
- W858326892 countsByYear W8583268922015 @default.
- W858326892 countsByYear W8583268922016 @default.
- W858326892 countsByYear W8583268922018 @default.
- W858326892 countsByYear W8583268922019 @default.
- W858326892 countsByYear W8583268922021 @default.
- W858326892 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W858326892 hasAuthorship W858326892A5007029101 @default.
- W858326892 hasAuthorship W858326892A5027487521 @default.
- W858326892 hasAuthorship W858326892A5040335590 @default.
- W858326892 hasAuthorship W858326892A5054436408 @default.
- W858326892 hasAuthorship W858326892A5069756984 @default.
- W858326892 hasAuthorship W858326892A5087325228 @default.
- W858326892 hasAuthorship W858326892A5090687734 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C2776503756 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
- W858326892 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C105795698 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C127413603 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C144024400 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C145420912 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C15744967 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C19165224 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C199360897 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C201995342 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C2776503756 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C2780451532 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C33923547 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C39896193 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C41008148 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C527412718 @default.
- W858326892 hasConceptScore W858326892C85973986 @default.
- W858326892 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W858326892 hasLocation W8583268921 @default.
- W858326892 hasOpenAccess W858326892 @default.
- W858326892 hasPrimaryLocation W8583268921 @default.
- W858326892 hasRelatedWork W1485779851 @default.
- W858326892 hasRelatedWork W1526583107 @default.
- W858326892 hasRelatedWork W1593004111 @default.
- W858326892 hasRelatedWork W195356320 @default.
- W858326892 hasRelatedWork W2166954788 @default.
- W858326892 hasRelatedWork W2188171725 @default.
- W858326892 hasRelatedWork W2240199307 @default.