FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W85865366> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W85865366 endingPage "24" @default.
• W85865366 startingPage "17" @default.
• W85865366 abstract "Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro effects of the combination of in-office and intracoronal bleaching on enamel and dentin bond strength and on dentin morphology. Methods and Materials Bleaching treatment was performed on 128 bovine teeth for three weeks. Intracoronal bleaching was performed in groups G1 to G3, and in the other groups a combination of in-office and intracoronal bleaching was performed. The following agents and materials were used (n=16): G1- sodium perborate and water (SP); G2- 37% carbamide peroxide (CP); G3- 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP); G4- HP + cotton pellet soaked in water (CPW); G5- HP + SP; G6- HP + CP; G7- HP + HP; and G8- CPW (control). Seven days after bleaching treatment the teeth were sectioned into two halves. One half of each tooth was ground to obtain a flat dentin surface. Dentin and enamel fragments were treated with a dentin/enamel resin adhesive. Resin composite was inserted in two increments and polymerized for 20 seconds. Following the restorative procedures, specimens were sectioned into beams with a rectangular cross-sectional area of approximately 1 mm 2 . Microtensile testing was performed in a universal testing machine. Bond strengths (in MPa) were calculated and the data were submitted to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test (α=0.05). For the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation, the exposed pulp chambers (n=5) were fixed, dehydrated, dried in a Critical Point dryer, and gold-sputter coated for analysis at standardized magnifications (500X, 1000X, and 2000X). Results None of the bleaching techniques reduced the enamel bond strength, the best results observed were with the intracoronal treatments with SP and HP. In dentin all bleaching techniques reduced the bond strength with the exception of the in-office HP application technique. The SEM results demonstrated similar dentin surfaces for the G1, G3, G6, and G7 groups with more open dentin tubules found than in the other groups. Conclusion None of the bleaching techniques tested reduced the bond strength of enamel, but they all reduced the bond strength of dentin with the exception of the group only treated with in-office bleaching using 35% HP. The worst bond strength results to dentin were observed in groups that received intracoronal bleaching with SP. Citation Amaral C, Jorge A, Veloso K, Rodrigues J, Erhardt M, Arias V. The Effect of In-office in Combination with Intracoronal Bleaching on Enamel and Dentin Bond Strength and Dentin Morphology. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 July; (9)5:017-024." @default.
• W85865366 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W85865366 creator A5014308706 @default.
• W85865366 creator A5015699046 @default.
• W85865366 creator A5044414269 @default.
• W85865366 creator A5055999004 @default.
• W85865366 creator A5069481339 @default.
• W85865366 creator A5076391440 @default.
• W85865366 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W85865366 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W85865366 title "The Effect of In-office in Combination with Intracoronal Bleaching on Enamel and Dentin Bond Strength and Dentin Morphology" @default.
• W85865366 cites W1984663012 @default.
• W85865366 cites W1987580680 @default.
• W85865366 cites W1994849858 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2004952783 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2014223976 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2015823573 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2037775733 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2056112907 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2081960781 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2092992875 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2104909728 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2115233276 @default.
• W85865366 cites W2274960368 @default.
• W85865366 doi "https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-9-5-17" @default.
• W85865366 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18633465" @default.
• W85865366 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W85865366 type Work @default.
• W85865366 sameAs 85865366 @default.
• W85865366 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W85865366 countsByYear W858653662012 @default.
• W85865366 countsByYear W858653662013 @default.
• W85865366 countsByYear W858653662015 @default.
• W85865366 countsByYear W858653662017 @default.
• W85865366 countsByYear W858653662018 @default.
• W85865366 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W85865366 hasAuthorship W85865366A5014308706 @default.
• W85865366 hasAuthorship W85865366A5015699046 @default.
• W85865366 hasAuthorship W85865366A5044414269 @default.
• W85865366 hasAuthorship W85865366A5055999004 @default.
• W85865366 hasAuthorship W85865366A5069481339 @default.
• W85865366 hasAuthorship W85865366A5076391440 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C13965031 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C156887251 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C159096172 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C188442228 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C26771246 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C2779263046 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C2910668435 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C533411734 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W85865366 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C13965031 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C156887251 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C159096172 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C159985019 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C178790620 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C185592680 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C188442228 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C192562407 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C199343813 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C202271784 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C26771246 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C2779227376 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C2779263046 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C2910668435 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C533411734 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C68928338 @default.
• W85865366 hasConceptScore W85865366C71924100 @default.
• W85865366 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W85865366 hasLocation W858653661 @default.
• W85865366 hasLocation W858653662 @default.
• W85865366 hasOpenAccess W85865366 @default.
• W85865366 hasPrimaryLocation W858653661 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W1973515071 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W2005700634 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W2045527640 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W2146848393 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W2170325754 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W2239797455 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W2366621090 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W2405807925 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W2952985323 @default.
• W85865366 hasRelatedWork W4312194701 @default.
• W85865366 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W85865366 isParatext "false" @default.
• W85865366 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W85865366 magId "85865366" @default.
• W85865366 workType "article" @default.